ipl-logo

Differences Between 1850 And Missouri Compromise Of 1850

575 Words3 Pages

There are many similarities and differences between the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and the Compromise of 1850. However many people manage to mix the two up, understandably so, as they both sound the same. But there are many differences that people should be aware of. For example, One compromise kept peace for a period of time, and the other one just riled up more people. Understanding these differences is crucial if one would like to learn about the Civil war. So, this essay will explain one from the other. The Missouri Compromise has many differences from the Compromise of 1850. One difference would be that in breaking up the different parts of the Louisiana Territory, it created peace between Northerners and Southerners. The Northerners were happy that more territory was safe for freed slaves, although they weren't quite happy that there was still slavery in the USA. However, the southerners stayed happy until the Southerners realized that this gave congress a say in which states could have slavery. The Missouri Compromise also banned slavery for the rest of the Louisiana territory. …show more content…

For example, The Compromise defined new boundaries of Texas after the Mexican American war and awarded Texas $10 million. A huge difference that came with the Compromise was that it outlawed the slave trade in Washington D.C, stopping people from selling or capturing African Americans that had previously been free as long as they were in D.C. Despite the good things that came from the compromise of 1850, many troubling issues appeared as well. Including the fugitive slave bill in the Compromise(which had been made up of 5 bills), which required all citizens to help slave owners find their slaves if one had run

Show More
Related

  • Pre-Civil War Compromises From 1820 To 1860

    1364 Words  | 6 Pages

    Leading up to the compromise, tensions between supporters of slavery and those against were very high. This feud reached a climax in 1819 after Missouri requested admission into America as a slave state. This did not go over well with many

    Read More

  • How The Missouri Compromise Made Political Conditions

    164 Words  | 1 Pages

    How the Missouri Compromise made political conditions worse: The Missouri Compromise… The purpose of the Missouri Compromise was to remove sectional and political rivalries between the North and the South. The North was provoked by the authorization of Missouri becoming a slave state by the South in 1819.

    Read More

  • Solutions To The Missouri Compromise

    164 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise was a solution to the issue of the difference in slave states and Free states. Missouri desired to become a slave state; however with the addition of Alabama this would upset the balance with twelve slave states and only eleven Free states. Conflict arose, as according to the article, “The slaveholding states claimed that Northerners were trying to end slavery”. The compromise was solved by a clever solution by Henry Clay. Missouri would be allowed to enter as a slave state, as desired, and Maine would be brought into the Union as a Free State, causing an equal twelve to twelve ratio of slave to Free states.

    Read More

  • Henry Clay's Role In The Missouri Compromise

    530 Words  | 3 Pages

    Missouri Compromise The Missouri Compromise was the effort of Congress to end the sectional and political rivalries triggered by the request of Missouri late in 1819 for admission as a state in which slavery would be permitted. The Missouri Compromise happened in 1820. It is important because Congress passed a bill granting Missouri statehood as a slave state under the condition that it was to be forever prohibited in the rest of the Louisiana Purchase. Henry Clay, John Quincy Adams, and James Tallmadge were involved in the Missouri Compromise.

    Read More

  • Owen Brown Research Paper

    686 Words  | 3 Pages

    The outcome of the Missouri Compromise was that “Missouri would be admitted to the Union as a slave state and Maine would be admitted as a free state, maintaining the balance between slave and free states and slavery would be outlawed in any U.S. territories north of latitude 36’30”. (15) After the Missouri Compromise, the Anti-Slavery Society was formed. The Anti-Slavery Society was formed in 1830 in order to end slavery after the death of a slave by the name of Nat Turner. The Compromise of 1850 was similar to the Compromise of 1820. The Compromise of 1850 occurred after the Mexican War when it came to decide whether these states should be considered free states or slave states.

    Read More

  • Compromise Of 1850 Dbq Essay

    1309 Words  | 6 Pages

    Before the passing of the Compromise of 1850, Congress needed to keep the power balanced between slave states and non-slave states in the government. To keep the balance, they passed the Missouri Compromise in 1820. This Compromise allowed Missouri into the union as a slave state and allowed Maine into the union as a non-slave state. As a result, the balance between slave states and non-slave states stayed equal. This resulted in neither the North nor the South having an advantage in passing laws.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Five Main Points Of The Compromise Of 1850

    150 Words  | 1 Pages

    With the United States having acquired new territory due to the war with Mexico, there was much controversy about slavery. Some inhabitants believed they had the right to decide whether or not they wanted slaves. The Compromise of 1850 was a series of laws that were meant to balance out the controversies between slavery and territorial issues. The five laws dealt with the interests of the slaves of the free states and the south. There were five main points of the Compromise of 1850: California would be admitted to the union as a free state; the land won from the Mexican-American War would remain open to slavery until they became states; the slave trade would be banned in the nation's capitol; Texas would relinquish its claims to the land that

    Read More

  • Why The Compromise Of 1850 Failed

    175 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt by the U.S Congress to settle divisive issues between the North and South, including slavery expansion, apprehension in the North of fugitive slaves, and slavery in the District of Columbia. The Compromise of 1850 failed because Senator John C. Calhoun from the South and Senator William Seward from the North could not agree on what Henry Clay was putting down. Part of the compromise was to make California a slavery free state which benefits the North, and enforcing a stricter fugitive slave law which benefits the South. Both the North and South opposed what the other was benefiting from. What sparked the failure of the Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.

    Read More

  • Short And Long Term Effects Of The Civil War

    925 Words  | 4 Pages

    However, the drawing of this line made the difference between “North” and “South” states more apparent (Van Atta, n.d). Elaboration 1: The Missouri Compromise was just a temporary solution that only helped delay the Civil War by trying to bring balance in slave and free states and to bring balance in the Senate. The Missouri Compromise was not very beneficial as differences between the North and South became more apparent leading to more debate over slavery. The compromise itself became much debated over as well, leading to the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which repealed the efforts of the Missouri Compromise in the first place. Evidence 2: The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 allowed for popular sovereignty to choose if the states of Kansas and Nebraska would be slave or free states.

    Read More

  • Reasons For The Missouri Compromise

    881 Words  | 4 Pages

    This compromise caused loads of controversy because the Southern senators believed that the territories should be able to decide for themselves if they should allow slavery or not, like the original 13 states. The Southern senators thought the compromise was unconstitutional. On the other hand, the Northern senators argued that Congress actually had the right to say ban slavery in new states. I understand why the Missouri Compromise was created, but I believe that the compromise made the situation worse. To me it was unconstitutional of Congress to deny new states the right to decide if they should allow slavery or not.

    Read More

  • Essay On The Compromise Of 1850

    498 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850 was an effort by Congress to find a solution to the ongoing debate over slavery in the country. It was a series of five bills that attempted to balance the interests of pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions. The first bill admitted California as a free state, while the second addressed slave trade with the District of Columbia. The third bill proposed a new Fugitive Slave Act, which allowed for slaves who escaped free states to be returned to their owners. The

    Read More

  • Causes Of The Compromise Of 1850

    518 Words  | 3 Pages

    When Missouri wanted to enter the union as a slave state, conflicts started between Congress and the South. The South began bringing up “ Civil War” and “Secession.” However, they created a compromise known as the Missouri Compromise. The Missouri Compromise allowed Missouri to join the union as a slave state and Maine to join as a free state and preserve the balance of power. Congress also drew an imaginary line across the Louisiana Purchase.

    Read More

  • Missouri Compromise Essay

    1563 Words  | 7 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an attempt by Congress to ease some of the political rivalries between the North and the South (history.com 2009). The compromise stated the fact that all states up north would not have slavery and all states south would allow and continue the act of slavery (history.com 2009). It went both ways since it split the country up evenly between slave and free. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was handwritten by Henry Clay in 1820 (ancestralfindings.com 1995). On March 6th of 1820, President James Monroe signed the Missouri Compromise and made it the new law of the land (loc.gov 2017).

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

    1652 Words  | 7 Pages

    In America during the early and mid 1800’s, many compromises were made about slavery in attempts to calm relations between Northern and Southern states. However, the effects of many of those compromises revealed their true nature of simply leaning on one side of the issue or the other. One such instance of this was the Missouri Compromise of 1820 in which Missouri was allowed to be a slave state only with the admittance of Maine as a free state as well as permanently prohibiting slavery in the remaining Luisiana Purchase north of the 36°30' parallel. Another such contract was the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 which recognized Kansas and Nebraska as official United States territories and allowed both to decide by popular sovereignty whether

    Read More

  • Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

    1121 Words  | 5 Pages

    However, the Missouri Compromise caused some problems. The compromise equaled the concerns and interests in the North and South, but the South was upset about how Congress gave itself the power to create and pass laws dealing with slavery. Much of the North was upset because Congress let slavery spread into another state. There were people who didn’t want to compromise, and others who did, such as Henry Clay.

    Read More

More about Differences Between 1850 And Missouri Compromise Of 1850

Open Document