Early in the United States’ history, America became divided between two parties: The Federalists and the Democrats. The Federalists were led by Alexander Hamilton, and the Democrats were supported by Thomas Jefferson. These parties disagreed over many different political and economic issues. Although these parties do not exist today, remnants of their policies can still be seen in politics today. Hamilton and Jefferson opposed each other on numerous issues. Hamilton believed that the general public was unfit to hold large amounts of power. Jefferson, on the other hand, believed that the general public was perfectly capable of ruling themselves. He wanted the United States to have a weak central government, where the people had most of the …show more content…
His campaign for a big, powerful government allowed for the government to support and protect the economy. His policy called for the federal government to assume the unpaid debts of the states. Hamilton states, “that assumption of the debts of the particular states by the union, will be a measure of sound policy and substantial justice” (Hamilton’s First Report on Public Credit). Hamilton’s policies also granted the right for the United States to have a National Bank that could print paper money, thereby stabilizing the value of currency. Hamilton stated that the bank’s chief object is “to enable the creation of a capital sufficiently large to be the basis of an extensive circulation, and an adequate security for it” (Hamilton’s Second Report on Public Credit). Lastly, Hamilton’s campaign promoted manufacturing and trade. With policies such as the “prohibition of the exportation of the materials of manufactures”, Hamilton planned to support and protect merchants and manufacturers (Hamilton’s Report on Manufactures). Acknowledging the strengths of Hamilton’s plan, many business men and large landowners would benefit from his policies. However, these policies created a plutocracy that left behind the small farmers and the skilled …show more content…
It also allowed for the people to have the true democracy they wanted; a government controlled by the people. However, his idea of an agrarian society would have hurt the United States. His vision that “while [Americans] have land to labor then, let us never wish to see out citizens occupied at a workbench, or twirling a distaff” was not realistic (Jefferson’s Manufactures). After taking both parties strengths and weaknesses into consideration, one can conclude that Hamilton’s Federalist plan was better suited for the United
In the 1790s, the first Secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton and fellow Federalists wanted to protect the United State's economic future through several different means; namely, the creation of a national bank, maintaining good financial credit, and by developing a lasting economic system. The United States was in turmoil, still rebuilding from their recent detachment from Britain. The United States government was in shambles, its economy arguably in an even worse one. It was for that reason that president George Washington elected Alexander Hamilton to develop a sound economic plan for the United States. Hamilton and his fellow Federalists had many ideas for improving the economy; however, the Republicans or Anti-Federalists, were disinclined to agree with their federalist counterparts due to opposing views on government authority.
After the American Revolution, the United States found itself in a big financial hole. The country found economic trouble both inside the country and internationally. The U.S. had accumulated a massive amount of debt in addition to angering their revolutionary allies. Federalist Alexander Hamilton was named by President George Washington as the first Secretary of the Treasury. Hamilton was tasked with not only solving the nation’s financial difficulties, but also to put the economy in a position to succeed in the long term.
• Both Hamilton and Jefferson saw our nation as having a future where America would be a great power; however, their plans to arrive there were very different. Federal Government- • When it came to federal government Hamilton favored a strong central authority. He believed that a strong central government was necessary to provide order. This order would make it so that the industrial world could grow in America.
Hamilton believed that the rich and educated people should be the ones to govern/rule; whereas Jefferson, he had this deep faith in the common people. The rich and educated, they have sufficient experience to govern people. They were basically raised to take charge and give orders. As for the common people, they had zero experience in this type field. It’s unarguable that the common people are the backbone of the nation, but most of their knowledge is based around the actual field.
In this Crash Course in U.S. History episode, John Green talks about America's early politics and the conflicting visions of Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Hamilton wanted a strong, trade-focused America, while Jefferson favoured an agrarian nation with democracy. Their differences led to two political parties—the Federalists and the Republicans. Hamilton's Vision: He wanted a powerful government supporting trade and manufacturing, allied with Britain. Jefferson's Vision: He preferred a farming-based America, distrusted concentrated power, and admired France.
Hamilton controls the Customs Service, the Coast Guard, and appoints a vast network of men to collect import duties and taxes. He sees America as an undeveloped land with great potential. He sets out to reshape the country, to transform it into one of the great nations of the world. In a very short time, he puts a series of great proposals before Congress -- instituting a national currency, the dollar; establishing a national bank, the forerunner of the Federal Reserve. Hamilton's vision spurs the growth of the stock market, the engine of the country's future prosperity.
Majority of the disagreements were how to drive the economy, the division of power between federal and state governments, interpretation of the constitution, and the foreign policy, which made Hamilton and Jefferson couldn’t agree and unite each other. Therefore, the supporters of Jefferson became Democratic Republicans, and supporters of Hamilton became
Differing Views- Hamilton vs Jefferson In 1790s America was rocked by a conflict between the nation’s first political parties- the Federalists and the Republicans. The Federalist Party was formed of merchants, manufactureres, bankers, wealthy farmers and professional people and headed by Alexander Hamilton. Thomas Jefferson led the Republic party which was formed of small farmers, frontier settlers, shopkeepers and artisans. As such both the leaders held different views of revolutionary ideas and ideologies.
Merrill described in The Anticapitalist Origins of the United States, “ Hamilton as the champion of a new liberal society based on equality of opportunity and Jefferson as a defender of a tradition-bound, hierarchical order”. This quote from Merrill’s research demonstrated what some historians depicted Hamilton and Jefferson as. Hamilton was an elite who took laws from the British empire and shaped them into the American legislature. Alexander kept the spirit of America intact while also producing an economic surplus and building a strong military. Jefferson led with agrarian ideologies, like limiting trade with foreign powers but establishing trade networks within the United States.
Hamilton believes in strong federal government and weak state governments. He also wants to favor rich people and insist on rich should rule the country and he has a loose interpretation of the constitution. Hamilton dreams towards country economy should
Political parties, Democratic Republicans and Federalists, started in the U.S. because of differing views of Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson, and the influence of newspapers. Jefferson’s and Hamilton’s different ways of thinking(mostly on issues that was beneficial for the country) played a huge part in the start of political parties. They fought about economy. Jefferson liked farming while Hamilton preferred manufacturing and trade. Interpretation of the Constitution was another thing they fought upon.
Both men have made very significant accomplishments during their lifetime. Jefferson became the Vice President of the United States. This position caused problems because the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches were in favor of the Democratic party and Jefferson was in favor of the Republican party. Therefore, it was difficult for Jefferson to obtain support because everyone disagreed with his views and ideas. If Jefferson and Hamilton did not disagree, the United States could run more
As a Federalist he believed the central government should hold the most power and influence over everything else. He thought the people themselves favored a government where the power was directly out of their control. He became critical of the other national delegates’ plan for ratification stating that it was more of the same as the Articles of Confederation (Lack et al, 1987.) Hamilton thought the people’s role in government to be that of a liability. He stated that the people were constantly changing in their attitudes and dispositions, and could not be trusted to make a sound judgement or do what was right for the nation.
Hamilton wanted to create public credit with a treasury system, a national bank, a mint, and increase manufacturing which would help unify the country. On the other hand, there was Jefferson, who opposed a strong central government. He argued that the “wealthy would gain at the expense of ordinary Americans and that Hamilton’s political economy would corrupt the morality of citizens and undermine the social conditions essential to republican government”(Powerpoint). The country would opt for an approach closer to Hamilton’s views. One of the first acts was the National Banking Act.
Hamilton vs. Jefferson Visions to Reality Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton both had very defined visions of the scope and power of the new federal government, how they saw the future of the economic development, and what the United States society should become. In my opinion Alexander Hamilton had more of an impact on the United States during the 1820’s and on contemporary government when compared to Thomas Jefferson. His policies did not strictly work during that time and many of his ideas are still seen in today’s society. Jefferson’s views and ideas on/of the national bank, higher tariffs, debt assumption, The Federalist Party, and his support of the ratification of the Constitution are all reasons in why his policies and visions came closer to becoming a reality. Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, molded the gatherings that provoked to the twofold party system under which the U.S. works today.