.
Who Is the Direct Target of This Policy, Meaning Who Will It Most Affect? Do Members of the Direct Target Population Come from Any Specific Demographic Groups?
This policy is aimed at the poor that receive welfare benefits. Drug abuse often is rampant among the lower socio-economic classes. The bill will directly affect families whose benefits are decreased, specifically, the children of the parents who test positive for drugs. This policy seeks to deny aid to the recipients who are using drugs, but benefits will continue for minor children. However, they will continue to suffer because they are dependent on their parents for sustenance. A reduction in benefits will cause families to sink deeper into poverty. Members of the direct population group come from
…show more content…
Our social work values support assisting clients to overcome barriers, not automatically judging people for their struggles and taking punitive action. We know that addiction is an illness that is not easy to overcome, even if you place a monetary value on recovery. Our proposed policy will allow clients to gain from the opportunity and accessibility to treatment. In theory, providing treatment to substance abusers will save taxpayers money because the individuals will have an increased ability to contribute to society and find employment.
What Ethical Dilemmas Does Alternative Policy Raise for You as a Professional Social Worker?
Our proposed, alternative policy poses no ethical dilemmas, and in fact is in support of social worker values. Furthermore, it acknowledges that denying benefits for substance abusers is not going to provide the necessary treatment that substance abusers need to get better. It also seeks to address the substance abuse issues from a treatment perspective in order to get to the root of the problem.
What Are Your Conclusions About This Analysis and Implications for
In “House Passes Tax Bill, as Does Senate Panel” by Thomas Kaplan and Alan Rapperport, both belong to the upper class and are affected by the newly passed bill, suggest that the tax bill passed by Republicans is negatively affecting individuals that are already in the lower class. Kaplan and Rapperport develops their claim by first stating the cause and effect of this bill that, “...actually raises taxes on low-income Americans within a few years”(Kaplan, Rapperport). Secondly, quoting the Senator of Maryland, “You’ve targeted the relief to help the wealthy, and the middle-income families are going to get stuck with it” (Cardin). Kaplan and Rapperport's purpose is to reveal the consequences of the bill in order to explain how it changes the
This is a Tribal Member, a Native American asking for more help concerning drug abuse. If her tribal government isn 't willing to provide adequate help to members, another option would be to implement a Federally funded drug and alcohol abuse prevention
For social workers working with this population, case management in conjunction with the proper services reduces substance misuse (Hwang & Burns,
They state that those who are currently protect by the DACA program “should not be forced to pay the price for the choices of their parents” (“Ending” 1). Next, the article explains that there are measures integrated within the policy to prevent exploitation of it for illegal or destructive purposes. For example, to be eligible for protection under the DACA program, one must be in or be graduated from the United States education system and have no considerable criminal record. To conclude the article, the writers urge President Trump to consider his decision carefully and to appreciate the far-reaching effects of repealing the DACA
At this time the client presented with a readiness to change and is highly motivated to receive treatment at MRFH. The client was diagnosed with Alcohol Use Disorder: Severe, and Cocaine Use Disorder: Severe. The client stated, "I am pretty much homeless and I left the Salvation Army after I was about to get into the Step Up Program. There were so many drugs at the Salvation Army. I want to learn more about myself and my addiction.
The government and administrators of prisons and treatment centers are trying to lower the cost of incarceration and treatment centers. Treatment centers are the more expensive option but it last longer and has more permanent effects in low level drug criminals. The family and individual want the easiest option that helps them or their children to treat their addiction. They want to use treatment centers to treat the addiction to prevent them crime again. The effectiveness of prisons and treatment centers vary.
Recidivism reduction is the goal here, and percentages in the study ranged from 5-164% reduction rates (NREPP, 20137, p. 4). Other benefits this study found from Drug Courts are ‘reductions in drug and alcohol misuse and improvements in socioeconomic outcomes (i.e., employment and education), family relationships, and access to needed financial and social services” (NREPP, 2017, p. 6). In all, both of these studies point towards the positives of Drug Courts and give reason as to why the funding should be plentiful and continued for further success in incarceration reduction
These policies work together, keeping people of like ethnic backgrounds and SES residentially segregated in areas that suffer from a lack of resources and enforcement of environmental policies like in Camden, NJ or Flint, MI. Living in these areas reinforces the cycle of SES, limiting their socioeconomic mobility by providing poor public education, leading to a limited job market. Their lack of finances prevents them from seeking better homes, keeping them in the area. This area, due to its lack of resources, doesn’t have as many healthy food options and safe locations such as parks to exercise, reinforcing unhealthy behaviors. Furthermore, their lack of finances prevents them from buying healthy foods even if they were available as well as discourages them from seeking medical help when it is needed because it is so expensive.
This model focuses on the individual needs of the offender and in doing so increases their chance of living sober once they reenter society. For example, indeterminate sentencing allows offenders who exhibit good behavior and participate in prison substance abuse programs to be paroled closer to the minimum sentencing term. This means the offender can be released from prison based on conditions set forth by the court. If the offender violates parole by committing another crime or failing to continue substance abuse treatment, they can be returned to prison. Furthermore, offering indeterminate sentencing for offenders who meet the criteria creates prison space thus helping with the ongoing problem of prison overcrowding (Seiter,
The purpose of Needle Exchange programs are to reduce the increasing number of infections such as HIV and Hepatitis C among individuals by providing clean needles and syringes to drug users who inject themselves. These government funded programs supply free clean needles to drug addicts so that they are at a lower risk of sharing needles and spreading diseases. There are many supporters for Needle Exchange programs. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2016), state “syringe service programs are an effective component of a comprehensive, integrated approach to HIV prevention among people who inject drugs”. Additional support comes from Allen, Ruiz, Jones, & Turner (2016).
Drug Addiction Imagine a life where someone is controlled by something that doesn't have a pulse, controlled by a substance that they can see ruining their life but for some reason they can't control the outcome. Substance abuse costs the health care system about $11 billion, with overall costs reaching $193 billion. That $11 Billion dollars could go to treating the addiction rather than treating the outcome, and instead of locking up low level drug offenders, we as a society should help them through their difficult time. And according to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), approximately 27 million Americans, or 10.2% of the American population over the age of 12 reported using illicit drugs in 2014. 10% of our society is
The efficacy of appropriate treatment for addiction disorder and substance abuse may be determine by drug and alcohol counselors, primary healthcare providers, social workers, and others. Therefore, it is necessary for competent and those properly trained to utilize the necessary tools needed for proper assessments, diagnosis, treatment planning and future referrals. Careful selection on these instruments may be influenced by cultural, race, and gender (Van Wormer & Davis, 2018). Furthermore, counselors or other clinicians would also need to consider the reliability and validity these instruments prior to selection.
The continuous use of narcotics results in addiction, and financial struggles due to the costly upkeep. “Financial problems are one of the major side effects of drug and substance abuse” (Buaggett, 2015). Addicts cannot adequately take an active role in the economic activities, as the use of drugs inhibits the abilities of the users to earn a daily living. Due to the instability of finances, this would result in selling personal belongings to continue funding the substance of choice, and depending on the addicts living situation, this could lead to losing their house or being removed from their current housing. While being under the influence, an addicts voice of reason is jeopardized, resulting in criminal activities which raise the chances of being apprehended by the law enforcers, as well as, heavy fines are imposed.
Thirty-five percent of Americans recieve help from welfare every day, and if we drug test them that number would suddenly drop. Some individuals claim that drug testing would help individuals by putting them into treatment; however, there are several reasons why drug testing would not help recipients. While drug testing could recognize the individuals who need help, problems would be caused such as impacts on the person, the cost, and other impacts such as on children and poverty levels. I A. First, drug testing will cause problems with the money people are receiving. If the test is positive the recipient will have reduced income and they may not get any income at all (US Department of Health and Human Services 8).
Legal repercussions may drive some abusers away from seeking help as their fear of going to jail may override their desire to seek rehabilitation. • There is a social stigma associated with drug abuse that may keep regular customers away, hurting our business in the process. This may be the case until we establish a solid reputation within the community and show that we accept all patients in need. Internal SWOT Analysis Lastly we analyzed what we had going for us and what we had going against us internally.