Have you ever asked yourself, why does protecting your privacy matter? Privacy is one of the fundamental rights of human beings. It is the state of being free from observation or disruption by outside parties. It is the right to have some control over how your personal information is collected and used. The fast pace at which technology is advancing causes information privacy to become increasingly complex as more data is collected and exchanged and digital dossiers grow. Logic serves to substantiate that as technology evolves, so do the methods of collection and protection. Information can be very valuable not just to the government but also corporations, companies and private players. This data collection can threaten and lead to invasion of our privacy, therefore there needs to be regulations, policy frameworks that can address these issues while safeguarding our privacy and anonymity. …show more content…
The movie tackles the most important and fascinating story of the 21st century. Snowden, the politically-charged, pulse-pounding thriller starring Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Shailene Woodley, reveals the incredible untold personal story of Edward Snowden, the polarizing figure who exposed shocking illegal surveillance activities by the NSA and became one of the most wanted men in the world. He is considered a hero by some, and a traitor by others. No matter which you believe, the epic story of why he did it, who he left behind, and how he pulled it off makes for one of the most compelling films of the year. Snowden metaphor best captures the scope, nature, and effects of the types of power relationship created by databases in the today’s technology
The National Security Agency (NSA) was founded in 1952 for collecting, processing, and protecting information for the United State government. In 2013 Edward Snowden, an employee of an NSA contractor, flew to Hong Kong and meet with journalist to start the process of revealing information about the organizations collection of metadata on US citizens. The metadata included phone calls, txt messages, and thing that people entered into search engines. The documentary Citizen Four captures Snowden’s days in Hong Kong and his conversations with the journalist involved.
The ever-changing advances within the massive surveillance program post 9/11, especially in the last decade, has had many negative effects on the relationship between the citizen and the state, our stride towards an open democratic society, and the citizen’s right to personal privacy. With issues arising about cyber security, drone strikes, and using confidential informants in investigations as a form of surveillance, the balance between freedom and security is askew. The meaning of our laws and policies have not been able to keep pace with the advances in technology or the development of surveillance as a whole. The increasing role of surveillance in the state has bred a dynamic of distrust between the citizens and their government. In open
To further support this, information that is collected is used to protect the Nation from "threats.” (2.1)Since this information is used to protect the Nation from “threats,” not to intrude on everyday citizen’s privacy, it is not an invasion of their right to privacy. Correspondingly, part of protecting citizen’s privacy is requiring a probable cause for
Nowadays, “privacy” is becoming a popular conversation topic. Many people believe that if they do not do anything wrong in the face of technology and security, then they have nothing to hide. Professor Daniel J. Solove of George Washington University Law School, an internationally known expert in privacy law, wrote the article Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have ‘Nothing to Hide’, published in The Chronicle of Higher Education in May of 2011. Solove explains what privacy is and the value of privacy, and he insists that the ‘nothing to hide’ argument is wrong in this article. In the article, “Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have ‘Nothing to Hide’”, Daniel J. Solove uses ethos, pathos, and logos effectively by using strong sources, using
Westin identified four basic functions of privacy that we as individuals constantly perform; personal autonomy, emotional release, self-evaluation, and limited and protected communication. The first denotes the desire of individuals to avoid being manipulated or controlled entirely by others. Something that could be considered as self-determination of self-governance and it refers first to the “ultimate secrets” of each individual; their fears, hopes and prayers. Then, to the “intimate secrets;” those that could be willingly share with selected people and that continues until reaching that zone of casual communication that is open to everyone.
MARLINE GOMES HIS 320/ ASSIGNMENT 1 Perhaps, Edward Snowden is one of the most debatable figures in recent history, which refers him to be a traitor or a hero. To some, he is a heinous criminal who should be brought to justice or to some he is considered as a national hero. The controversy arises when Snowden leaked a massive number of confidential documents in 2013, with detail governmental investigation programs after quitting his job in National Security Agency (NSA). Journalists from The Washington Post and The Guardian helped him to expose the leaked documents.
Those who think that the NSA has the right to act in the way they do would tend to brand Snowden a traitor. Those against the NSA’s national security tactics find that Snowden was a hero, and consider his current circumstance a worthy
The “Nothing-to-Hide Argument” Analyzed: In this rhetorical analysis, I will be taking a look at Daniel J. Solove’s essay “The Nothing-to-Hide Argument,” which is about privacy in the context of personal information and government data collection (Solove 734). Solove’s main argument in his essay is that the general public has a narrow perception of what privacy really is. The purpose behind his main argument is to expose the problems with the nothing-to-hide argument while presenting a way to challenge it for his target audience, government officials. Solove’s argument to his target audience is effective through his exemplary use of substance, organization, and style in his essay.
The main issue in the Snowden controversy is the conflicting rights of private individuals and the US government with regard to the use of telecommunications and the internet. There are ethical issues surrounding this controversy and the most applicable ethical approach for this case is “Ethics by Rights Approach”. As a background, the reason why US government had declared Edward Snowden a traitor is his involvement in the leaking of about 1.7 million confidential US documents, 15,000 Australian intelligence files and 58,000 British intelligence files from the National Security Agency (or NSA) to the public. These confidential information were acquired by the NSA through the PRISM program by collaborating with big internet companies such
Government surveillance can cause great danger to the American people if it falls into the wrong hands. The systems will be an unnecessary investment, because the risks outweigh the rewards. The introduction of these systems would also divide the people of the United States. We must allow the government to understand the risks of surveillance and why it can be bad for the country, or we will face
As the presence of the NSA spying on citizens becomes more common the possibility of this future draws closer and more realistic. The public’s safety should always be a constant to strive for, but stealing the rights, freedom, and privacy of people should not be a sacrifices made to ensure this. To prevent a travesty, such as
An Ethical dilemma is a troublesome situation in which one finds themselves in a mental conflict between moral choices. Either choice betrays the other, yet something must be done. In early 2013, Edward Snowden began to contact different media sources to expose the secrets behind the NSA and the mass surveillance programs founded by our government. By doing this, he betrayed our government, but shed light on their massive breach of the 4th amendment to millions of Americans. By exposing our government, Edward Snowden broke a professional ethical code and made himself a target of the U.S. Government.
Today, Ladies and Gentleman. Allow me to start off with introducing one of my favorite Russian Philosopher, Ayn Rand. The reason why I have included her in today’s debate is that she correctly understood the central importance of privacy to the underpinnings of freedom. In her 1943 novel, “The Fountainhead”, she noted that “civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy … civilization is also the process of setting man free from men". The earliest treaty regarding privacy is the US Bill of Rights drafted in the late 18th century.
Whistleblower Edward Snowden has entered the debate over Australia's new metadata laws, saying Australia has joined other countries in undertaking mass surveillance of its citizens. He said: "Basically they use local authorities such as this metadata program that's been passed in Australia to collect everyone's communications in advance of criminal suspicion. "(Hamish Fitzsimmons, 2015) While acknowledging that governments must take steps to protect people from terrorism, he said the sort of metadata collection programs being operated by governments were at odds with free Western society. "This is dangerous," he said, "What this means is they are watching everybody all the time.
Technology is growing at a fast pace and every day we see a new product or service that is available. Many times it is hard to even keep up with the latest phone, computer, game console, or software. There are so many different gadgets to choose from and even the internet is on information overload. As a result, we can no longer truly expect to have privacy.