Case Facts In November of 1988, Nicole, a 13-year-old girl consummated a murder-suicide pact with a friend in Maryland. Nicole’s counselor was made aware of her suicidal thoughts and discussed it with her. However, Nicole denied making statements about intending to commit suicide and the counselor failed to notify administration or Nicole’s parents. In March of 1989, the father of the girl and plaintiff in this case, Stephen Eisel, brought negligence charges against the Board of Education of Montgomery County, the Superintendent of Schools of Montgomery, the Sligo Middle School Principal, and Dorothy Jones, the School Counselor. The plaintiff later amended his complaint to include a second school counselor, Diedre Morgan after learning she was apprised of his daughter’s intent to commit suicide as well. The defendants filed a motion for dismissal on summary judgement and won. The plaintiff appealed the decision in 1991 arguing that he should have been notified by the counselors and given opportunity to intervene (Eisel v Board of Education of Montgomery County, 1991). Case Issue In order to determine liability, the courts needed to decide if the events that unfolded in this case could be attributed to negligence on the part of the …show more content…
It was determined that Nicole’s death was foreseeable and the counselors failed to report their knowledge of her intent appropriately per school policy. Although, the counselor proactively confronted Nicole with the information, she should have proceeded with notifying administration and the teen’s parents. Exercising confidentiality in this case over the duty to prevent a suicide violated the school policy. Ultimately, it was determined that the foreseeability of harm instills a duty for counselors to report suicide threats (Eisel v Board of Education of Montgomery County,
This case was decided on June 15, 2017. Issue: This cases issue involved Timothy W. Gallagher bringing an action of medical malpractice, negligence, wrongful death, and emotional distress suit against Cayuga Medical Center for releasing his son from the hospital when he was having suicidal
Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California 1. Assertion made by the plaintiff. Tatiana Tarasoff’s parents (Plaintiffs) filed a suit against the Board of Regents and the employees at the University for failing to notify the intended victim. Tatiana’s parents asserted that the four psychiatrists at University of California, Cowell Memorial Hospital had a duty to warn Tatiana and her parents of the threats made by Poddar.
On June 8, 2010, eleven year old, Jorge Tarin, told a school counselor he was going to kill himself after school. Because he could not bear being hit by his father anymore. Jorge’s school sent him home due to the lack of power they possessed to keep him and the lack of knowledge on his family history. The same day a social worker and a police officer visited the Tarin family, the home was declared safe to keep a child in, without any real knowledge of the family. They left the home without knowing Jorge had previously spent fifteen months in foster care due to past abuse from his father, who no longer maintained rights to see or live in the same house as his child.
Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. Pico Board of Education v. Pico, was a Supreme Court case that came out of Long Island, New York, which was heard on March 2nd, 1982 and decided on June 25th, 1982. But the problem that had arisen in the case happened many years before. In 1975 Island Trees’ Board of Education attended a conference held by the Parents of New York United (PONYU). Those parents presented a list of books to the board, including: Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut Jr., Go Ask Alice by Oliver LaFarge, and Best Short Stories of Negro Writers which was edited by Langston Hughes (American Library Association). Of the listed books, nine were present in the Island Trees’ high school library, another one was in the junior high.
4. Brown v. Topeka Board of Education is a very important and indexed lawsuit in the history of the United States. The racial issue of American apartheid in the history of the United States is a major controversial issue that existed since the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1781. What attitude should the new country adopt in dealing with the social status of those black people who came at the Old British Colonial era? Everyone has their own opinions.
In the Brown v. Board of Education case there were two parties. They were Oliver Brown, Linda Brown, and their two attorneys, Charles H. Houston and Thurgood Marshall. The other party was the Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas. The lower court was the Federal District Court. Their case was about segregation in public schools.
Brown v. the Board of Education Summary Brown v. the Board of Education consisted of five separate cases about segregation. Each case was in a different state but the organization NAACP helped those filing each case. The cases were in Kansas, Virginia, Delaware, South Carolina, and Washington D.C. Each case consisted of numerous families.
The ability to create an enforceable law is an important part of the case, but the major significance lies in the cultural understanding of race and racism. The case makes a previously accepted theory of white supremacy and reduces it to segregation. Segregation is farther reduce to social customs that were largely ignored in society during the time that require a change and thinking about race, leading to changes in law. The trail is the first signs of a majority seeing Jim Crow laws as an evil. The verdict of the trail shows the concept of legally structured racism is unjust.
Case Analysis: Gay-For-Pay Introduction This case takes place in Wichita, Kansas, a midsize city in the Midwest. Located in Wichita is the Wichita Center for Families (WCF), an agency that provides a variety of services for at-risk families and youths. Alicia Hall is a 25-year-old MSW student from Wichita State University, currently interning within the "youth-at-risk outreach unit" at WCF. Alicia has 2 years of bachelor level case management experience with adults with mental illness and has a passion for the LGBT community.
While campus murders, non-negligent and negligent manslaughter, remain one of the rarest forms of criminal actions there is a variance between public and private institutions in this country involving the number of incidents reported on campus. Murder and non-negligent manslaughter is stated as being; “Any death caused by injuries received in a fight, argument, quarrel, assault or commission of a crime.” (Peterson’s, 2015, pg. 1) and the focus of this white paper includes bringing in non-negligent instances of manslaughter. The loss of life is serious no matter the circumstances; however, this instance of crime is relatively rare compared to all other forms of crime. Still it is important for universities to take measures including the use of background checks and security planning in association with local emergency resources can help mitigate such events from occurring.
“A sense of hope and something to live for is what teens need. They also need a way to raise their self-esteem. When they look at this world and see it through a hopeless window, there is nothing that will make them want to stay in it,” said Dan Snarr, a Skyline High science teacher. Suicide among teens is a recurring issue in today's world. The article “Suicide - Killing the teens & young people in America” written by Christopher Wager discusses the hopelessness that teens feel that leads them to commit suicide.
For youth from the ages of 10 to 24, suicide is the third leading cause of death, and eight percent of teens report attempting suicide (“Suicide Prevention”). In Palo Alto, California, the suicide rate for high schoolers is between four and five times the national average, and 12 percent of students contemplated committing suicide in a 2013-2014 survey (Rosin). As a result of this epidemic, the issue of the Silicon Valley Suicides has gained national attention over recent years. However, as the press and media target the systemic issues, administrators, teachers, and, parents seek external help and explanation for internal problems. In covering the suicides of Palo Alto, the press and media have encountered issues including the stigmas in discussing
Decades ago, children of various races could not go to school together in many locations of the United States. School districts could segregate students, legally, into different schools according to the color of their skin. The law said these separate schools had to be equal. Many schools for children that possessed color were of lesser quality than the schools for white students. To have separate schools for the black and white children became a basic rule in southern society.
This article published by The Age newspaper discusses the management of youth suicide in schools and how suicide is addressed. Author Dan Haesler is a teacher, writer and speaker and has won the NSW Premier’s Anika Foundation Teacher Scholarship award for his addressment and risen awareness of youth depression in education, Haesler is also an active member of Wellbeing Australia’s NSW Advisory Board. Through this article Haesler draws from his own experience dealing with youth depression in schools to further illustrate his point. Haesler starts off by describes youth suicide as the silent killer in our schools because no one talks about. Haesler highlights the fact that the NSW Department of Education directs staff to not correspond with students
As of 2015, 5 in 100,000 girls and 14 in 100,000 teenagers commit suicide (Lewis). Teenagers are becoming more vulnerable and schools seem to be taking no notice. If these lives could be saved, it would help so many families across the united states. The National Institute of Mental Health states that there “are as many as 25 attempts of suicide to every one that is actually committed” (Eco Child’s Play). Suicides can be prevented by treatment of the illness.