Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on the effectivness of the electoral college
Essay on the effectivness of the electoral college
Essay on the effectivness of the electoral college
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
State Rep. Randy Dunn D-Kansas City, has filed House Bill 497, which would adopt an agreement to elect the President of the United States by the nation popular vote instead of by the decision of the Electoral College. House Bill No. 497 comes in response to outdated and unjust Electoral College system. “Every Missourians’ vote should count the same,” said Dunn. “Whoever the majority votes for that given person should be the victor.
A country in which someone is democratically voted Comander in Chief.. Not because the voters of the country picked them, but because of an old, unfair method that brought the person into power. The electoral college is a method in which representatives from states vote on a presidential candidate, not the state as a whole. This method has failed multiple times, as can be seen when the electoral college votes are compared to the popular vote. Instead of using the electoral college to pick the president, the United States should instead move to using the popular vote to pick the president. Using the popular vote would insure that who is picked for president is who the people wanted.
Some of the benefits are that it protects the choices of the minority, “it facilitates a two-party system… [and] it directs more power to the state” (Noble). There are also some negatives or cons of the Electoral College. First, since there is a minimum of three electors per state, some states get a higher percentage of the votes, and some people do not consider that democratic. Second, this might cause people not to vote because they will think that their vote does not matter. Finally, it is a con because small states get more power than bigger
The electoral college is a way for selected individual’s to be chosen from each state to vote for the two-presidential candidate’s that have won popular vote for that state. Each state gets two votes for each senator and an additional vote for each member of the House of Representatives, which is based on state population. When votes are accumulated the candidate must get at least 270 votes from the Electoral College system. ( Levin- Waldman, 2012) There are some pros which are the electoral college system is efficient way to represent the country’s overall votes, favors states with smaller populations, this avoids them from having to recount the nations popular vote.
However, it creates issues like the election result may not truly reflect the public will, even though this does not happen very often. Reflecting the popular will is one of the important criteria for evaluating an electoral method. Therefore, I hold that the Electoral College is not effective enough at the moment and further modifications may be
Short Essay: The Electoral College was constructed in the 1700s in which it was a process that ensured that election of the President of the United States was fair and not chaotic. It consists of the selection of the electors, the meeting of the electors where they vote for President and Vice President, and the counting of the electoral votes by Congress. Many people disagree with the system of the Electoral College being an impact when determining the President of the United States.
Electoral College: For the Lose One view to consider that when voting for a president through the electoral college , voters are confused about the election process no more than they are unprepared of the consequences they ace of their votes not being counted. Voting by popular vote when electing a president is the best choice contrary to the electoral college; in favor of defying the people. Americans vote in order to elect a president of their preference to run our country. Voting by popular vote surpasses the whole electoral process by giving the people not just what they want, but what Americans need. Direct election of presidents remains solid as opposed to the “faithless” electoral college.
In the United States, there is a popular belief that the public decides presidential elections directly, as in a true democracy; however, this is only part of the truth, due to the Electoral College. The Electoral College is the system that the United States has in place to decide the president and vice-president, the way that it works is the United States people vote for electors who will represent them in a vote based on each states population (Jost & Giroux Sec. 1 Par. 6). The Electoral College is a widely debated topic among people in the United States, as stated in a document by Jost and Giroux “The Electoral has been controversial throughout U.S. history” (Jost & Giroux Sec. 1 Par.
When the founding fathers were creating the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, there was a constant struggle between the states because they wanted to have power. With the Electoral College, these smaller states had more power because of the number of electoral votes. For example, in the article it states, “Compare that to ten of the small states by population in America; with only 6,000,00 voters combined, they get 32 electoral votes for president.” Even though the bigger states have a larger population, if the smaller states combine, they can have more electoral votes than the larger states but with a less population. One advantage of the Electoral College would be that the smaller states have a greater say in the
The United States is a government republic, with chose authorities at the elected (national), state and neighborhood levels. On a national level, the head of express, the President, is chosen in a roundabout way by the general population of each state, through an Electoral College. Today, the balloters essentially dependably vote with the well-known vote of their state. All individuals from the government council, the Congress, are straightforwardly chosen by the general population of each state. There are many chosen workplaces at the state level, each state having no less than an elective Governor and council.
I think we should keep the Electoral College. Electoral College is defined in our textbook as; “An unofficial term that refers to the electors who cast the states’ electoral votes” (Patterson, T.E., 2013). Electoral voting is tied in with the states popular voting. Choosing electoral college adds to the cohesiveness of the nation by obliging an appropriation of popular support to be elected President, improves the status of minority interests, contributes to the political dependability of the country by promising a two-party system, and keeps up an elected arrangement of government and representation (Kimberling, W.C., 2008). I think that the Electoral College system is a big part of the cohesiveness of our country and it requires the distribution
Several years after the United States came to be, the Constitutional Convention met to determine how the new nation should govern itself. The delegates saw that it was crucial to have a president and vice president, but the delegates did not want these offices to reflect how the colonies were treated under the British rule. The delegates believed that the president’s power should be limited, and that he should be chosen through the system known as the Electoral College. The Electoral College is a body of people who represent the states of the US, who formally cast votes for the electing of the president and vice president. Many citizens feel that the Electoral College goes against our nation’s principle of representative democracy, while others
The first article's main point is that the United States of America should not get rid of the electoral college, but do away with the popular vote instead. The popular vote does not pick the president, it merely choosing which party of electors will be able to cast their votes towards their candidate. The article also said that instead of the electors for each state be the state's senators and representatives, they should be people of that state, decided by a lottery held before the election day. The second article said that if the country gets rid of the electoral college, then it would be as though the country is handing the election to the states that have the highest populations (i.e. California and Texas).
All through the history of the United States of America, many people have discussed the abolishment of the Electoral College. For many reasons, some believe it is what makes our country have the type of government we have, some believe that it's what limits the power of the government, and many people such as Mitch McConnell believes it is what gives us our freedom and prosperity. While these are valid arguments there is a multitude of reasons to why the electoral college should be abolished. Such as there is only a need for twelve states in order to become the president, popular vote of the people for president can still lose, and the Swing states are given too much power and attention compared to that of the other states. This is why I believe in the abolishment of the Electoral College.
The Electoral College is the process to which the United States elects the President, and the Vice President. The founders of the Constitution came up with this process. This was done to give additional power to the small states, and it was done to satisfy them. It works by the citizens of the United States electing representatives called electors. Each state is given the same amount of electors, as they are members of congress.