Instructions: Please retain questions and numbering. Each question is worth 2.5 points. Incorrect, incomplete and/or unclear answers will lose points.
1. What was the reasoning of the Federal Housing Administration for not permitting African Americans in the newly developed suburbs?
Selling to nonwhites would undermine the property value in new suburbs. So Development owners did not want to sell to nonwhites.
2. In reference to the government’s appraisal system, what does the term “ redlined” mean?
In the 1930s, the government started a property appraisal system in cities, according to condition of the property and race, for financial risk. The parts of the city farthest away from minority neighborhoods were marked with green. The minority neighborhoods were marked with red, or redlined. Green neighborhoods got mortgages and
…show more content…
What did the federal policy known as Urban Renewal attempt to do?
Urban Renewal was supposed to make cities more livable. But in truth, 90% of all housing destroyed was not replaced.
5. How did this policy impact the housing of Blacks and Latinos?
Due to Urban Renewal people lost their homes. Two-thirds of all people displaced due to Urban Renewal were black or latino.
6. How did the Fair Housing Act of 1968 impact the traditionally white neighborhoods that nonwhites moved into?
Blacks moved into white neighborhoods, thinking the value of their new home would stay the same or increase, as it had previously for whites in the neighborhood. Instead, their neighborhood value declined because they had moved into it.
7. What was the practice of “blockbusting”?
Realestate agents prayed on racial fears of to get white homeowners to sell at less than market value, and sell quickly. Homes were then sold to nonwhites at inflated prices. Predominately white neighborhoods became nonwhite neighborhoods fairly quickly due to blockbusting.
8. How did the property appraisal system started by the federal government influence “white
They argue that institutional racism in the housing market enacted by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), private loan and real estate institutions and actors, and white residents effectively and permanently isolated African Americans. Institutionalized racist practices of the housing market such as redlining and steering, coupled with white flight and structural disinvestment in African American neighborhoods, effectively isolated African Americans and further contributed to the creation of black ghettos. Thus, residential segregation concentrates poverty, erodes institutional and economic support, and ultimately causes its residents to normalize their problematic social environment of high levels of joblessness, teenage pregnancy, drugs, and violence. If the segregation of African Americans were to be resolved by their economic achievement and class mobility, middle-class African Americans should be able to enter white neighborhoods of comparable income levels. However, as Massey and Denton show, once the threshold of “too many black families” is crossed, white flight occurs and poorer black families move into the neighborhood, creating (and expanding) racially segregated
we still have today and which someone knowledgeable on the situation would call “ghettoization” (Jackson). Massey and Denton’s book, American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass, hits strong on this topic of “residential segregation”. Massey and Denton, both went hand and hand with what Jackson was saying. This is a well organized, well-written and greatly researched book.
Redlining defines the act of refuting facilities to residents of particular areas based on the fact that these residents belong to a minority class. The white communities were rated “Green” which meant “desirable area” and the non-white communities or the ones under development, were rated “Red” which meant that these areas were non-desirable. They were redlined. This resulted in most of the benefits going to white communities and they progressed more as compared to other racial groups. Blockbusting: Blockbusting was a technique used by real estate agents to encourage white property owners to offer their homes at cheap values in the fear that families from other racial groups were moving in the neighborhood.
Essay on Race African Americans have come a long way due to racial issues and discrimination. Most people forgot where the word Ghetto’s came from. The myth of the Ghetto’s came from the Supreme court, which they called the “Facto”. The Ghetto’s received this name due to many reasons. The one reason was because the individuals who stayed in the ghettos did not make enough of income.
The individuals who were being victimized the most and the lack of justice the 1968 Fair Housing Act did were new to me. As stated in the ninth chapter, middle-class African-Americans were the ones being victimized by mob actions. In my mind, every African-American was being victimized. I did not take into consideration that only a select few African-Americans were able to have the opportunity to move into white neighborhoods. These African-Americans could afford the housing since they often had higher occupational and social status than their white counterparts.
Natalie Moore writer of The South Side says “In Chicago, black people always do the best with what they have, and so we see high rates of homeownership in a number of communities on the South Side. We see strong neighborhoods, but even if you’re doing the right thing, if you’re in a black neighborhood or in any neighborhood that’s 10 percent black, your home value
Wealth is one of the factors why residential segregation is an increasing problem. Golash- Boza explains, “Residential segregation happened when different groups of people are sorted into discount neighborhoods” (271). It is because of housing segregation
Then they’d bring in another black family, rinse, and repeat”. Buying the property at a low price, then selling at a high rate to lower income black families just to gain profit. Another example Coates uses is a black family in a white neighborhood, who had a cross burned outside their front lawn. Coates used pathos very well in this article. He wants the reader to understand the hardships that were created for
For bringing the home within the reach of a black purchaser, however, the speculator extracted a considerable price.” (Jamelle Bouie,How we built the ghettos, page 2) This is like when Lena the mother of Walter and beneatha bought a new house and only had to put a small down payment on it in order to buy the
The Pruitt-Igoe Myth is a documentary that explores public housing in Saint Louis, Missouri, in particular the history of the infamous Pruitt-Igoe public housing complex. Pruitt-Igoe was a public housing project billed as the perfect solution in the early 1950s, to solve the problems of slums in Saint Louis and to bring people back into a city that had seen a population decline from previous years. Saint Louis was an ageing city desperate to regain their postwar prominence as a bustling city, but faced many challenges pertaining to the racial makeup of the segregated city and the loss of many jobs to suburban areas. Many whites had begun to participate in what is now referred to as “white flight”, or the migration of middle class whites to
Lance Freeman, an associate professor of urban planning in Columbia, wanted to investigate if there was any displacement going on in two predominantly black neighborhoods that was briskly gentrifying. Much to his dismay, he couldn’t find any correlation between gentrification and displacement. What was surprising to Freeman was his discovery, “poor residents and those without a college education were actually less likely to move if they resided in gentrifying neighborhoods”. (Sternbergh, 19) Freeman adds, “The discourse on gentrification, has tended to overlook the possibility that some of the neighborhood changes associated with gentrification might be appreciated by the prior residents.” (Sternbergh, 19)
On a normal scale, measuring the association between two subjects, one would assume gentrification and school segregation are not related in any sense. In fact, most would argue that school segregation ended in 1954 with the Brown v. Board of Education. This assumption would be incorrect. Deep within the American society lies a new kind of segregation that is neither talked about nor dealt with. Segregation is a result of gentrification—the buying and renovation of houses in deteriorated neighborhoods by upper-income families or individuals—thus, improving property values but often displacing low-income families.
As suburban Americans began to own the same consumer goods and believe in the same values, the prospect of inclusive thought began to disappear. The aesthetic homogeneity with men’s clothing, for example, left very little room for men to dress up in anything other than the bland suits characteristic of the 1950s. Among the varying forms of homogeneity present in the suburbs, none had the effect on conservatism that racial homogeneity did. From the 1950s until “the 1990s, nearly 90 percent of suburban whites lived in communities with minority populations of less than 1 percent,” showing how the suburbs created conservative thought that would last nearly half a century in the suburbs. In order to achieve this racial ubiquity, “the suburban builders…openly advertised the fact that their communities excluded minorities,” revealing their conservative and racist beliefs William Levitt, the father of the suburbs, argued that “if we sell one house to a Negro family, then 90 or 95 percent of our white customers will not buy into the community,” further showing how minorities were feared to be a threat in a white society These racialized advertisements and thoughts encapsulated the attention of their audiences by reinforcing the idea of minorities (primarily African-Americans) being a threat to security, which dates back to the 17th Century with the institution of slavery.
Thus, we need a new housing policy that will address not only the discriminate housing problem, but also urban poverty in general. Issue History The Civil Rights Act of 1964 eliminated the Jim-Crow
History shows time and time again that these promises were broken. This led many African Americans to become broke or accumulate low income leading to generational poverty. As a result, many Black people have become homeless or have to rent living spaces rather than owning their properties. “In 2022, 74.6% of White households owned their homes, compared with 45.3% of Black households-.” The gap is more than 29 points when in 1960 there was a 27-point gap.