Legal history A system of rules that a particular country or community recognizes as regulating the actions of its members and may enforce by the imposition of penalties, this is the definition of law. Although the definition of law is evident and perceptible,the portrayal and act of law varies. Throughout the justice system there are many inconsistencies such as the type of law, there is common,criminal,civil, and administrative. Throughout these systems of law there are also criminal proceedings. In these criminal proceedings, some will find that the verdict is just. While others may disagree. In legal history there are many cases where an unjust verdict is apparent. One case that has been infamously known to have an incorrect verdict is the case of The people V.S Oj Simpson. This criminal trial is one of the …show more content…
The case begins on June 12th,1994 when Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman are stabbed to death. Their bodies found in the front courtyard of Nicole's condominium in Brentwood. Oj is taken into custody and pleads “not guilty” to both criminal charges. However, there are several crucial pieces of evidence that suggest otherwise. Some evidence that suggest that Oj was responsible for the murders include; Neighbors witnessing Oj driving away from the murder scene around the time of the murder, DNA test proving that three of the blood stains found near the rear gate of Nicole's house belonged to Oj Simpson, Oj had an alby for every hour of the day except the time that the murder took place, and many more implicating pieces of evidence. However, even with all of the incriminating pieces of evidence shown throughout the case, Oj Simpson was acquitted of all criminal charges. This is in my opinion,is the biggest travesty on the legal system known to
The American criminal justice system tries to be truly just and has been before, but humans are not perfect and cannot always be truly just. One way the American criminal justice system is not just is when people are wrongly convicted of crimes. Although people in the system may not do this on purpose,
This action immediately contaminated any evidence found on her body. Ever since that fateful day in 1996, this case has remained unsolved and continues to puzzle detectives all across the country. Many people have been called into question as to who killed JonBenet Ramsey, but they all have been exonerated for her murder. Two of the most notable people called into question was John Mark Karr and Gary Oliva. Both Karr and Oliva confessed to the murder of JonBenet Ramsey, and both served some time for confessing to her murder but both have been exonerated because they did not match the DNA evidence found on her body.
On June 12, 1994, at night a dog walker discovered Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman’s brutally murdered bodies. Nicole Brown Simpson was OJ Simpson’s ex wife and mother to two children Sydney and Justin. Ronald Goldman was Nicole’s friend. Both of these two were stabbed repeatedly and had their throats cut. Once police got to the scene and immediate suspicion came on Oj Simpson.
Everyone believes the oj did it but there was once piece of evidence that made oj get the verdict he wanted and all because of a black glove that had been found at the murder scene they asked oj to put it on and it did not fit his hand and that shocked the jurors to no end and the reconsidered their decision and then they went to collaborate and the verdict will be ready on tv with the whole nation watching watching the verdict around the world coming
The O.J. Simpson Case: The Unjustified Ruling of O.J. Simpson’s Acquittal The brutal killings of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman: up until the case closed, law enforcement could not officially find the perpetrator. However, that only stands officially. In an aggressive trial from June 20, 1994 to October 3, 1995, a jury indicted and acquitted ex-husband of Nicole, O.J. Simpson, of a double murder charge for the two deaths. For background, on June 12, 1994, waiter Ron Goldman came to Nicole’s house to return her mother’s glasses, but around midnight a neighbor found Goldman and Nicole’s bodies stabbed to death.
OJ Simpson was a very achieved person player until he made one big mistake. The trial of OJ Simpson was a long stressful process to prove a star innocent or guilty of murder. This took Place in the state of California on October 3, 1995. OJ was tried for a murder crime of his ex-wife and another man. In the end OJ turned out to be not guilty of this crime.
In order to have a better understanding of this movement, it is crucial to analyze from its roots. There are many theories that linked the Genesis (beginning) of the civil rights movement to many protests and boycotts. One of these major events was the murder of Emmett Till that brought a lot of tension between black and white people in the United States. Emmett, a 14-year-old black teenager from Chicago, was allegedly murdered for whistling a white woman in a store. Sanford Wexler, an eyewitness to the murder of Emmett, writes in his book, Milam and Bryant [the two white guys who murdered Emmett] drove Emmett to the Tallahatchie River and made the boy carry a 100-pound cotton-gin fan from the back of the truck to the river bank before ordering him to undress.
The prosecution did not prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt; thus, justice was not served for the real victim, Caylee. Although Casey Anthony won in a court of law, she lost in the court of public opinion; thus, being punished by society just as OJ was. References Anthony v State of Florida Case No. 5D11-237 (FL Dist. 5 Ct.
The murder or lynching of Emmett Till shook not only the United States, but the entire world. People were finally seeing the harsh racism issue which was causing great harm to innocent citizens. The false accusations of Carolyn Bryant lived on long after Emmett was killed but only recently did she reveal parts of what she testified were not true. Ms. Bryant should be arrested because firstly, her role in the murder conforms to the definition of manslaughter, additionally, she lied to a jury, and furthermore her fabricated testimony left damage to those who were expected to continue live normally after their son, cousin, friend, grandchild, niece was brutally murdered. Exploring these aspects will clarify why Carolyn Bryant deserves to have her freedom taken away, similarly to how
For those people that were alive and glued to their television set in the 1990’s, they know the person, the drama, and the famous trial that is the OJ Simpson murder case of 1995. However, if this event occurred before you were born or if you did not pay attention to the news, this murder trial was the subject of conversation for years on end. This trial included the plaintiff, also known as the state, accusing a former NFL running back, Orenthal James “the juice” Simpson or known as OJ, of murdering his wife, Nicole Brown Simpson and an innocent bystander, Ronald Goldman. Although he was found not guilty in the LA County Superior Court, the opposite ruling was reached in civil courts. Despite all of this controversy, he remains one of the
The case involves the murder of a man's wife and stolen property( this would be the woman’s purse ). The man was talking to the homicide detectives and classified the murderer as African American, knowing this they called young Brenton to come as he was walking and the man told the police it was him, he was the murder. Brenton and his family suffered as he was thrown in jail. The whole investigation was done sloppily, the beat him to get him to say what would fit the detective’s story, and they drafted a paper to say he was admitting to the crime and made him sign it. At the end the jury found him not guilty, he was released.
OJ Simpson is Indeed Innocent “If it doesn’t fit, you have to acquit,” this quote said by one of OJ Simpson’s attorneys, Johnny Cochran, is widely known for its impact on the controversial case of OJ Simpson. From 1994-1995 OJ Simpson was known as one of the most controversial cases in the USA due to the verdict that OJ was innocent of the murders of his ex wife and one of her friends. On June 12, 1994 Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman met an untimely demise, and the only suspect the police ever reviewed was OJ Simpson. OJ was later caught in a low speed chase in a white Ford Bronco before being taken into custody and put on trial. In the sensationally controversial court case involving OJ Simpson as a suspect for murder, The innocent ruling
I think there is more evidence proving his innocence than his guiltiness. The corruption in this case and the racism in the LAPD helped the defense show that there was not enough evidence to prove that OJ was guilty. There are many reasons why I think OJ is innocent, but the piece of evidence that I think is most important is that all of OJ’s blood at the crime scene contained EDTA. EDTA is something that is put in test tubes with blood to prevent blood clots. EDTA is not found naturally in people's blood, which means someone had to have planted OJ’s blood at the scene.
O.J. Simpson was a famous football player and that was accused of killing his ex-wife nicole brown , also her boyfriend Ron Goldman. They were brutally stabbed to death on June 12, 1994 at the resident of Nicole brown condo in Brentwood. Before the bodies were ever recovered Oj had packed his bags and caught a flight to Chicago, later he received a phone call saying that Nicole Brown was murder. The cops wanted to talk to him and later he had lead the cops on a hot pursuit chase and they apprehended him. OJ Simpson should be held accountable for murders of his ex-wife Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman.
I believe that OJ Simpson is not responsible for the deaths of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend, Ronald Goldman, and instead his son, Jason Simpson, was the culprit. While I do not believe OJ to be the perpetrator, I have hypothesized that he was still at the scene of the crime, however, he was not present until after the acts were committed. If there is any conceivable explanation for OJ’s abnormal behavior after the murders, other than that he killed the two victims, it is that he knew that his son had killed Nicole Brown Simpson and wanted to protect him. Jason, who was 24 at the time of the murders, most likely committed the acts in a rage killing.