Caelan Stebelton
Professor Longman
English 1201
4 May 2017
Why College Athletes Should Be Paid, and How The NCAA Can Do That High level college sports such as basketball and football dominate television networks across the country throughout the fall and winter. The stars of the team often become household names, with jerseys and memorabilia sold all over the world. The National Collegiate Athletic Association, better known as the NCAA, rakes in hundreds of millions of dollars each year, with the universities and coaches receiving millions as well. However, the athletes that entertain millions of fans each year do not receive a dime, their only form of payment is the scholarships they receive from the university. In fact, collegiate athletes
…show more content…
Most NCAA sports do not make enough profit in order to pay their players any more than their scholarships, due to the fact that most sports do not draw large crowds and have much popularity. The focus on paying college athletes would mainly be on Division 1 football and men’s basketball players, the two sports that bring in the overwhelming amount of the NCAA’s athletic revenue. These two sports bring in billions of dollars due to large television and media contracts, and the amount of public support for these two sports. The gap between amount of profit made by the NCAA and the amount of compensation that football and basketball players receive is the largest, making it important that these players are paid for what they are worth to the NCAA and the universities that they …show more content…
The benefits of this is that this would cover all of the extra costs that the scholarship does not provide and creates a truly free college experience for the athletes. This would also slowly the give the players access to their finances, with less money directly available to them. With less money to spend immediately, athletes would be more likely to make better choices with their money and how they spend it. However, this process runs into the Title IX wall as well, with hardly any other program besides men’s football and basketball being able to afford to give all their players
In a way, college athletes are already getting paid. Universities should not have to hand out more money to their athletes just to satisfy them. It would be unfair to other non-athlete students if college athletes were to receive payment for play and give athletic scholarships. Non-athlete students don’t get paid to do their school work. These kids are college athletes, they are not professional athletes so they should not be paid to play.
Injustice Case for NCAA Players NCAA athletes should be compensated due to their devotion towards extra-curricular schooling along with recreational activities. In the Huffington Post, economist convey that NCAA schools can definitely afford to pay college athletes. Spokeswoman Meghan Durham asserts that only 20 of the approximate 1,100 schools which constitute the NCAA make more from sports than they spend on sports, according to association’s most recent estimates. Rodney Fort, former sports economists…exposes that the money is already there since the NCAA brought about a billion dollars in revenue in its most recent financial year and top tier athletic programs regularly bring in tens of millions of dollars as well. Opponents stated that
The college football player has gained vast popularity among Americans over the past years. The result of this has increased the amount of money the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) profits. The athletes bring insuperable amount of money and recognition to their university. So why aren’t they being rewarded for what their time commitment? In “Should College Players Get Paid?”
Are you a students-athlete in need of compensation from the sport you love? There is a possibility of getting this kind of money from playing certain levels in sports. Paying college athletes has been and always will be an ongoing argument. I divine that paying these athletes will help students financial futures, help the costs of abrasions to the students themselves, and bring in prodigious amounts of money. Initially, paying college athletes will help them create a sense of financial awareness.
College Varsity Athletes Should be Paid In this paper, I argue that college varsity athletes should be paid for playing sports that bring in revenue. In particular, College football and basketball because they bring in the majority of the revenue for the schools. The revenue accomplished by college sports programs continues to increase, due to the growth in interest of the NCAA basketball tournament and the college football playoffs (Berry III, Page 270). Throughout the past few years, one of the main topics debated in college sports is whether or not the athletes should be paid.
Scholarships do not cover all expenses and athletes do not have time to work to pay off their growing debt. Since scholarships do not cover everything, athletes should get paid so they do not graduate with a large debt. The large debt would accumulate from every day to day expenses over the athletes four years of college. The pay would be similar to what they would get if they were working a job because they spend the majority of their time with their sport.
Ryan Vanderfords’ article published in the Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal explores this issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid beyond what they receive in scholarships. Vanderford is currently a law associate at a law firm in Los Angeles, California. He played sports throughout high school and college, so the author can relate to this topic. The payment of college athletes has become a more prominent issue in today’s society then it has been in the past. He argues that at major universities, student athletes help the school generate their revenue and therefore should be paid.
After all, colleges are founded with the purpose of educating people. The first concern with a college should not be sports, it should be education, no matter how much money they make off of athletics. So with this in mind, why would you give extra money to athletes instead of students? Many division one student athletes already receive full-ride scholarships that cover all of their college-related costs even though they are less qualified academically than many other students who are not athletes. If colleges are going to give extra money to anybody, it should be the outstanding students who are more qualified academically because the theme and purpose of a college is
Colleges willing to pay for their players could attract talented athletes. Students may want to go out for a sport if they know they will be paid, which could also bring talent to the field or court. With new talent, teams could win more and earn more recognition. This would benefit the players, coach and
It includes only those funds that end up in the NCAA 's bank account.” The FCAA being the organization that would collect and distribute the capital. This research paper described why college athletes should be paid. They make personal sacrifices, and take risks in order to produce revenue for their schools.
If colleges began to pay their athletes, then they could build a bad reputation for being mercenary and lose their educational reputation If they are allowed to play, then it can be financially detrimental to the college because there are many flaws in the system. College athletes should not be compensated for their actions regarding athletic activities, no matter what sport or level they compete on. The idea that college athletes should or shouldn 't be paid
Should college athletes be paid? Annotated Bibliography Benedykiuck, Mike. “The Blue Line: College athletes should be paid.” Dailyfreepress.
Are they students or employees? They spend more time with the sport than in school. Student athletes should be acknowledged for their performances. College athletes should be paid to play because they bring money into the school, advertisement, and they perform the same tasks of pros. College kids bring in thousands of dollars every game day.
The NCAA made about 845 billion dollars in the year of 2011 from all the college athletes that went to the colleges, but not any of this money went to any of the college athletes. Now does this sound fair to you? There have been many arguments between people debating if their college athletes should be paid or not. People think that they should be paid because of all the hard work and effort that they put in games. In March Madness, the NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) make an extreme amount of money, but colleges didn’t put in any work, the athletes did.
College athletes are being paid scholarships but do scholarships pay for rent, loans, or food etc. Paying college athletes detracts the purity of the game. Most football players are not in it for the money but for the love of the sport and the chance to say that they had the chance to play college football at that university. College football is a privilege to play it is also a lot of people's jobs that are on the line that they work at year around threw breaks assignments and