Henry VIII did not act with a sense of justice or fairness throughout his rule, demonstrated by his disregard for both his people, but also their wishes, as he acted based only on what he wanted. Henry VIII did not follow what could be considered a moral compass - he followed his own self compass. One of the most prominent acts of selfishness that Henry committed was his separation from the Roman Catholic Church in order for him to annul his marriage to Catherine of Aragon. By separating from the RCC for solely his own reasons demonstrates that he is neither fair or just to his people, as many of them were followers of the RCC. When Henry VIII was excommunicated by pope ____, the foundation for his hatred of (this religion) began, which was …show more content…
Additionally, this demonstrates that Henry believes that he is higher than anyone, and no one can tell him otherwise. This kind of unchecked power given to a man who cannot take no for an answer and acts of his own accord acutely expresses how Henry is not a good leader. As said by Bishop (this guy), a leader is supposed to use his unlimited power to benefit, not suppress his people. Additionally, by splitting from the church for his own benefit, he is not showing care to his people and his actions were unprincipled because of his single minded decision.[7] Following the split from the RCC, Henry began to dismantle traces of (the religion) by initiating a program (called this) that shut down all of the monasteries and to take their money and land. At the sacrifice of freedom of religion, the money gained from the lands and buildings helped to ease the financial problems that he created. Not only did this change force the people who previously followed Protestantism and Catholicism, but he also took advantage of their religious subduement to pillage their places of worship to compensate for his lavish and costly lifestyle.
The Edict of Nantes was issued in 1598 by Henri IV of France to grant French Protestants (also known as Huguenots) equal rights with Catholics. The Edict was introduced primarily to end the long-running, disruptive French Wars of Religion. Henri IV also had personal reasons for supporting the Edict. Until assuming the throne Henri himself had been a Protestant, and he remained sympathetic to their cause: he converted in order to become king, famously saying, "Paris is worth a Mass." The Edict succeeded in restoring peace and internal unity to France for many years.
Patrick Henry presented a monumental speech that convinced the Virginia delegates to consider independence from England. Henry’s speech was one of the many catalysts that tilted the once ambivalent and divided mindsets of the colonists about England to a rebellious sentiment. The powerful speech was delivered on March 23, 1775 which called for opposition against the British; the rapid success of the Henry’s speech can be seen by the first military engagements in the Battles of Lexington and Concord on April 19, 1775 shortly after the speech was made at the Virginia Convention. In his speech, Henry attempts to persuade the members of the Convention that war with Britain is inevitable and waiting will only make the war more difficult to win.
The Reformation in the Renaissance At the beginning of the Renaissance, the “time” had been going backwards. The people seemed to forget the older way of life. Instead of having stone houses and castles, they went back to thatched roof huts. Even though people neglected things, they also discovered new facts like the sun was actually at the center of the universe instead of the earth.
There are a lot of enlightenment ideas like free speech, divide power and majority rules. The enlightenment idea that I am talking about contains all three of ideas. It is made by John Locke and is called as natural rights. I think the most important idea that challenges the existing authority is the natural rights. The enlightenment idea of natural rights challenged the existing authority of the king because he thinks he is the only one that has rights and no one else has it.
In 1775 the American Colonies stood at a tipping point. Britain and the Colonies had been embroiled in a continuing struggle over numerous injustices, and the Colonies seemed at long last situated to engage in a revolution against Britain. However, the colonial representatives were still tied up in negotiations with Britain, and many delegates of the Virginia Convention wanted to delay actions until the negotiations had concluded. Patrick Henry disagreed with the delay, so he addressed the Convention, arguing for the need to mobilize troops against the British, a request tantamount to treason. Instead of shying away from the polarizing nature of his argument, Henry adopted a respectful, but urgent, tone, crafting an argument that would inspire his audience into action.
Shakespeare’s play, Henry V, portrays the newly crowned king of England, King Henry V, as a committed, fearless, and relentless leader. France is England’s archenemy and their relationship only worsens after the Dauphin delivers a mocking message to England’s new king. The Dauphin frequently ridicules the English and King Henry, whereas, the King of France, Charles VI, does not underestimate Henry and his people as his son does. (Source B) Throughout the play, the two leaders display their differences in terms of personality, leadership, communication skills, and ethics.
In the essay ‘’Civil Disobedience’’ by Henry David it teaches the very beginning moment of resistance the government for the cause of knowing something for being morally wrong. This is because of the ideas that he formed in his essay of a sharp-witted planned out study introducing the main three methods of persuasion. He included by giving each example of logos, ethos, and pathos. Henry made himself clear what he was advocating for and inspire other to do Civil disobedience movement in the near future.
The St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre demonstrated how devastation could quickly take place in the presence of conflict. Unlike previous issues concerning the Protestants and the Catholics, this August 24th, 1572 pertained all the built up violence in one tragic battle. A big component that drove this violence was fear of being overthrown. Specifically, the fear of being taken over by the Huguenots allowed for the population of France to find validation in their actions or at least encourage said conflict. This is demonstrated by the publics’ unrest from previous quarrels, the involvement of the king and the authorities.
In anger, King Henry broke from the church and made himself head of the church of England. King Henry could do whatever he wanted, because the people of England had lost their freedom. Laws were created which forced people to stop practicing the Catholic religion and turn to Protestantism, which resulted in a great loss of souls. While all of this was
The implication is that the people are being ruled. Henry used his skills in speech to persuade the Council or Parliament that trying to rule over others was wrong. He spoke out against the way things had always been done and
The play, The Night Thoreau Spent in Jail, by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee, is based on the lives of two transcendental men, Henry David Thoreau and Ralph Waldo Emerson who lived during the mid-19th century and was written as a protest against the Mexican-American War. Emerson is known for his many maxims, which are short statements that express a general truth or rule of conduct. In one of his maxims, “Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of your own mind,” Emerson argues that nothing is more important than following what one personally believes in. The word sacred is used as a means of something highly regarded or holy and the word integrity is doing what one perceives is morally right. Therefore, Emerson suggests the theme that nothing is more highly regarded than following one’s own belief on what is morally the right thing to do.
However, motivation is not the only thing that King Henry is able to do with his oratory. He is also able to use his words to intimidate, as he does when he threatens the Governor of Harfleur that if they do not surrender, he will not “leave the half-achieved Harfleur / Till in her ashes she is buried”. Henry is able to affect people with his
He got his divorce and stayed on the throne” (Hung). In addition to the fall of Queen Catherine, others were punished for dishonoring the king’s commands. This included, the king’s Minister, Cardinal Wolsey, who “failed to get the divorce from Rome” (David 420 ). Evidently, Henry VIII was willing to do anything it took to get rid of people who dissatisfied him. This connects to the Code of Chivalry because similar to the relationship between knights and their King, Henry VII expected his wives and court members to maintain their loyalty.
During the Middle Ages, the Catholic Church had a great amount of power because it was the only one at the time. As expressed in The Canterbury Tales, it even oversaw the court, so one could propose that the Church had exponential power. They seemed to rule the economy and hold a lot of land. Kings and queens were even preceded by the Church. Supposedly, in those times, the Catholic Church was a source of great hypocrisy or a good number of its people were.
To avoid feeling guilty from slavery whites said blacks were bad and began to oppress them. They did this through segregating them, watching their every move, and putting them in positions to commit crimes. Bigger is frustrated because he is not allowed to do anything because he is black. " When Bigger goes out onto the street he sees a poster for Buckley's campaign: “IF YOU BREAK THE LAW, YOU CAN'T WIN!” And, as Bigger knows, if you don’t break it, you keep losing.