Examples Of Micro Sociological Theory

Introduction

Theories are set of statements that seek to provide a logical explanation for how a particular phenomenon works (Ogunbameru, 2013). In sociology, theories attempt to explain human interaction and the consequences of such interactions on social life as a whole. Thus, in pursuit of this goal, sociologists come up with varying theoretical approaches in order to provide an objective explanation of the social phenomenon under study. The theoretical approaches employed by sociologists are generally categorised into three namely: micro theory, macro theory and meso theory. Micro sociological theories adopt a social process approach to the explanation of their phenomenon. By this, it means that such theories center their attention on the

The theory is a micro sociological theory because it stresses the influence which the significant others have on an individual’s perception of himself which consequently affects the way the individual behaves through constant adjustments. The theory is rooted In the symbolic interactionist perspective which emphasises a micro-level analysis of human behaviour In order to understand the motive and meanings of behaviour. Theorists who come under the umbrella of symbolic interactionist perspective include; George Herbert Mead, Erving Goffman, Herbert Blummer, Howard Becker, Norman Denzin, etc (Ogunbameru, 2013). All theorists under this perspective contributed to the explanation of the individual’s self concept directly or indirectly through their various scholarly expositions acknowledged all over the world. In an effort to do justice to this topic, the following is an outline of the

Agents of specialisation include people, groups, institutions and ideas that we are surrounds us (Squirrell, 2017). Therefore, human beings are products of the society. As earlier noted, the primary group plays a very significant role in the development of the self. During socialisation, the human mind is very crucial. Cooley believed that the mind is social and it influences the mental abilities particularly imagination. The mind was responsible for how we imagine what we imagine. This was most obvious among children whom Cooley saw as skilful managers of self-presentation. They learn to modify their behaviour based on their interpretation of people’s response about their portrayed