ipl-logo

Economic Polarization

770 Words4 Pages

Discussion on Economic Developments and Regional Polarization How did economic developments amplify the regional polarization between the North and South? The south and the North of the US before the civil war were two different parts in the same country. The country experienced social and economic polarization that was from the inequalities between the two regions of the country. The differences started immediately after the industrial revolution. The revolution challenges between the two parts were payment of taxes and slavery this brought inequalities in the country and as the time went on the North grew in population and economically while the South lagged behind (Clawson, 1980). Before the civil war the North owned 75% f farm acreage, 71% of the rail road, 75%, 91% of factory production and 71% of the total population. This made the country to be divided into two because of sectionalism. This made the south to develop a need for freedom and secession from the north. Clawson (1980) argues that the American economy by the time being an agricultural state the slaves were used to work in agriculture farms which were more in the south. The north ended slavery, started running an industrialized region, and as the farms in the North were producing more and prosperous. The developments of …show more content…

The Union developed several strategies to win the war which focused on further economic polarization of the south. The first strategy was the anaconda strategy which will ensure little bloodshed in the war. Using this strategy, the union blocked all the main ports that the confederate economy relied on. The south relied so much on trade thus anaconda strategy led to blockage of all ports where the ships could not get insurance making the south to export little cotton (Ralph, 2003). The blockage weapon ruined the economy of the south making the cotton crop they were growing

Show More
Related

  • How Did South Carolinians Affect The Outcome Of The Battle Of Cowpens

    1738 Words  | 7 Pages

    The South, fighting a defensive war, had totally different strategies. One was to use blockade runners, fast and agile European ships, to bypass the Union blockade. Another strategy was to stand ground and slowly wear the Northern forces down until they surrender. Conscription, drafting people of draft age into the military, was also used. King Cotton Diplomacy, the belief that European importers of Cotton would ally with the South if they cut the cotton exports, was also employed by the

    Read More

  • Why Confederate Food Was Worse Than Union Food

    616 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Union blockade was a strategic blockade of Confederate ports to try and make it hard for the Confederacy to function. The blockade cut off resource flow and made it easy for the Anaconda plan to go into motion. The Union blockade made food shortages more common and the Anaconda plan made it

    Read More

  • Compromise Of 1850: A Comparative Analysis

    524 Words  | 3 Pages

    The North relied upon industrial growth and believed in free labor for the expansion in the West. Whereas, the South’s survival was based upon agriculture, more prominently cotton. Thus, the risk of slavery being abolished by the Federal Government would be detrimental to their way of

    Read More

  • North And South Dbq

    187 Words  | 1 Pages

    Next, when the North had more upper class people due to wealth, it caused the North and South to disagree with how money should be obtained. The South argued that slavery was the answer and the North argued that factories were what had to be done. In one of the documents, it said, “There were 22 million people in the North compared with only 9 million in the South” (Document 7). This means there was more money being made in the North due to more people working in factories versus money being made selling cotton produced by slaves on plantations. The disputes on money were a huge factor in causing the Civil War.

    Read More

  • How Did Military Strategies Affect The Outcome Of The Civil War

    754 Words  | 4 Pages

    The greatest factor that impacted the outcome of the civil war was the difference between military strategies of the North and South. The Union thought breaking the confederacy commutation system would help the defeat the south. The North used a strategy to blockade southern ports to cut off their supplies. This article states that “the Anaconda plan, would eliminate the possibility of confederate help from abroad” (“Northern Plans to End the War”).

    Read More

  • Regional Differences In George Washington's Farewell Address

    969 Words  | 4 Pages

    The North had party leaders pushing them to end tariffs that the south benefitted from in order to make money for the north. Political leaders blowing up these differences between regions is the reason that a compromise was not able to be reached and inevitably a major part of the reason our country was so divided it went into a civil war. Today, regionality is being used to divide the country. For example, in the 2016 election, Republican candidate and eventual President gained the vote in West Virginia by promising to save the coal mines which was an issue almost exclusive to that area. President Trump also promised to bring factory work back to the midwest states and also made several claims that the democrats didn’t care about the blue collar midwest in an attempt to divide the country by region.

    Read More

  • Discuss The Causes Of The Civil War Dbq

    661 Words  | 3 Pages

    Uncompromising differences between the South (Confederacy) and the North (Union) created a civil war that lasted five years. During this war, Abraham Lincoln was president. His election led to the secession of many Southern states. After refusing to recognize the Confederacy as its own nation, the American Civil War commenced in 1861. The three main causes of the Civil War between the North and the South were industrial and agricultural economies, politics, and slavery.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast North And South

    1038 Words  | 5 Pages

    The United States emerged into two distinct regions: The North and The South. Some of these differences relate to their geographical locations, economic conditions, societal relations, as well as transportation systems. Geographically, the north had control over multiple trade ports although the south lacked such ports. Economically, the North's economy is based upon manufacturing while the South's is based upon agriculture. Socially, the South favored slavery, but the North was against practices of slavery.

    Read More

  • Civil War Economic Causes

    837 Words  | 4 Pages

    After four long years, the Unions won the war which saw to it that both parties ended up as a united nation once again. The North overpowered and defeated the South due to a number of reasons as illustrate below. To begin with, the fact that the South majored in agriculture made them to be left behind in terms of industrialization, an important factor during the civil war since fabricated merchandise was highly regarded than agricultural products. The North was therefore privileged to be in a better position in production of armory since it was able to host firms that manufactured ammunitions and war locomotives. The South was poorer, since cotton was no longer making ready income and they only had a few manufacturing origins.

    Read More

  • How Did The Civil War Affect The Economy

    791 Words  | 4 Pages

    The War Between the States was one of America’s greatest wars—it was the fight for freedom, but it also impacted the economy. Because of this, America’s labor and transportation systems both took a significant turn during the Civil War, impacting America’s economy forever. In the end, the American Civil War greatly benefitted our transportation system, but devastated the South’s labor force. For a war to be fought strategically well, there first must be a form of simple, yet speedy, transportation. That is where the transcontinental railroad came in.

    Read More

  • Dbq Essay Civil War

    533 Words  | 3 Pages

    The South was offended by the North. The North had prominent economy. Northern states based their economy on trade and manufacture goods. Document 3 states, “ the North’s economy came to depend more on trade than on agriculture.” Document 5 also inform how cities in the North grew promptly, the railway system, and the shipping industry.

    Read More

  • Essay On What Caused The Civil War Dbq

    484 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the North slavery wasn't practiced. The economy of the North was mainly dependent on industry. The North depended on the South for

    Read More

  • Sectionalism Dbq

    801 Words  | 4 Pages

    Southern economists noted this change and claimed that the prospering North were forcing them into dependency. After the passing of a

    Read More

  • What Caused The Civil War Essay

    574 Words  | 3 Pages

    The American Civil War was the war that ended slavery. The civil war was known as one of the bloodiest and deadliest conflicts the United States had ever seen. The loss of life was an estimated amount of 620,000 men. It lasted four years, from April 12, 1861, through May 9, 1865. However, while slavery was a major cause of the American Civil War, there were several other major factors.

    Read More

  • Labour Market Polarization

    1347 Words  | 6 Pages

    Introduction The machine’s ability to perform cognitive, physical, and social tasks is changing jobs and the labor market at a rapid pace. Automation has already taken over many tasks of which minimal labor input is necessary. Low-skill jobs are stagnating, middle-skill workers are being provided with lower pay, and those of higher skill roles are receiving even greater pay. The polarization of work availability is growing as machines’ ability to perform the tasks of lower-skilled workers is only developing further; however, machines’ presence in the labor market is not always apparent.

    Read More

More about Economic Polarization

Open Document