Option 1
Exploring Life of a incarcerated juvenile, Alonza Thomas
Alonza Thomas was a typical fifteen year old boy, he had no run ins with the police, his mom worked two jobs and his father was not around. His mother was trying to finish a college degree, and help get the out the slum life they were in.His entire life ruined by one mistake, he was sent to adult prison for thirteen years. He was convicted right after California “cracked down” on juvenile crime. Alonza Thomas attempted to rob a convenience store at gunpoint, when the clerks and owners tackled and stopped him. “But with the additional charge of assault with a firearm, Alonza faced as many as four decades in prison (McNally, 2014).” To lower his sentence, he pleaded guilty. Alonza was sent to a state penitentiary, not a juvenile facility since his crime fell under the Proposition 21, and his crime was dangerous enough to be charged as an adult. “In the state prison of Tehachapi, young offenders were housed in a separate area, away from the men in the general population (McNally, 2014)” Even though the young population was separated from the general population, the juveniles faced many other threats. Alonza spent a lot of time in isolation, weeks to months at a time. The prisoners spent time in almost
…show more content…
He did commit a serious crime, but a look into his life should have lowered the sentence some, but he did have to pay for his crimes. His harsh treatment in prison negatively affected the person he is today, he was named in a suit against the prison system over mistreatment to the mentally ill inmates. His mentality is different, he will never be able to be the man he could have been. He can only look forward and hope to be the best man possible. His personality is changed, he owns up to that, he is more aggressive in certain situations, but if anyone went through what he did, then they would be in the same
He was given many chances for parole but he believed he was not suitable for life outside of prison so he waived his rights for parole hearings. The public was happy with the outcome of the case as he was off the streets not able to do this again. The death penalty was wanted by many who believed sitting in jail did not compensate for his
Luke McKenzie Criminal Investigation Steven Avery 4/19/2016 At the young age of 22 Steven Avery was wrongfully convicted of rape. Avery spent almost 20 years in prison, prior to being exonerated. Avery was convicted, and sentences to 32 years in prison on September 14, 1985. He was released from prison September 10, 2003.
His first example is Michelle Jones, who went to jail for the murder of her 4-year-old son. While she served her time, Ms. Jones decided to turn her life around and to make something good out of her life. She became very accomplished, but there were a few things that stood out to the public, like getting rejected from Harvard University. Even though she did, in fact, decide to change her life around in prison, the crime was still made. I believe that there are
Jonathan Wayne Nobles was not truly rehabilitated. He could have acted like he was becoming a better person, so that he was treated better or get an opportunity to be released. He manipulated people to help him and believe him. Nobles didn’t explain what happened between Gene Hathorn and him to Steve Earle. He was a different person than he was when he committed the crime, though that doesn’t prove that he won’t do anything like that again if he was released from prison.
Hubner’s intentions with this study and Last Chance in Texas is to allow others that read the book to recognize the meaning behind a juvenile’s criminal actions. This could be a guide book for a potential probation officer to understand unique ways for them to treat their offender with the motive to not focus on punishment. The potential probation officer and use the ideas of the criminal finding a way to put himself in the victim’s shoes and understand how being a criminal harms more than just the person that was intended to be hurt. The audience of this book varies. The book was poorly written without as much detail, so the stories written down could not have a false accusation that the stories documented from the students in this book
157). The guards allowed other inmates to gang rape him, and he performed sexual favors on the strongest inmate, protecting himself from violence. During this time, he learned about “human behavior and the criminal underworld” and knew that he never wanted to return (Rosewood, 2015, p. 12). He took what he learned from prison and applied it to his criminal activities throughout his life, and once he reached eighteen, the facility reluctantly released him, arguably a significant downfall to the juvenile detention system. His release report stated: “[he was] anti-social and there is something in his past development that is preyed upon his mind” and “we consider him dangerous and also believe that he has the homicidal tendencies peculiar to a paranoid type” (Rosewood, 2015, p.
For months four prisoners were involved in the plot to escape Alcatraz, but only three of them made it out (Hopkinson, 6). These prisoners were men who had a history of criminal activity ever since they were kids. Frank Morris was just fourteen years old when he started getting in trouble with the law. Breaking windows and stealing jewelry and money got him locked up in a juvenile facility (Watson, 51). He then went to the Florida and Louisiana State Penitentiary’s for narcotics and robbery charges.
There is no doubt that Kalief Browder needs some type of justice, especially for his family and friends. Kalief Browder was just a 16 year old in the Bronx that was wrongfully accused of a stealing a backpack while he was on probation for a previous petty crime. Therefore, he arrested and when he got the amount of bail he quickly found out that he and his family could not pay for it. After not being able to pay for bail, he was sent to a federal prison named Rikers Island for this petty crime, in which he was never charged with. He was sent to a federal juvenile correction center with a bunch of actual criminals that did more than just be accused of stealing a backpack.
In the book, Just Mercy, Bryan Stevenson covers many aspects of the legal system, including Stevenson’s quest to create fairness for convicted children. Through Stevenson’s experiences, he sees, first hand, children who are sent to adult prisons. Specifically he saw how the prisoners who were convicted as children revert to a diminishing mental state and often have a great deal of trouble readjusting if they are even remotely capable of doing so. One experience that Bryan Stevenson encountered was with a young fourteen year old named Charlie whose case illustrated the impacts of an adult world in a child’s head. Unlike Charlie, children should never be pushed into adult prisons or receive adult punishments because of their lack of clear understanding
The main argument expressed in the article "Greg Ousley is Sorry for Killing His Parents. is that Enough?" is that juveniles/kids should not be sentenced to prison for long term, even if they commit severe crimes, and they have the ability to rehabilitate themselves, so they should not serve this long term sentences when they are showing improvement. An example that gives the author is the case of Greg Ousley, a teen who killed his parents at the age of 14, and that now with a age of 33 years he still serving the 60 years sentence. The author Scott Anderson interviewed Greg during a few sessions. When Anderson interviewed Greg, he saw a completely mature man with wishes to work with young people, to teach them what can go wrong by using his life as an
There are more than 2,000 child offenders serving life without parole sentences in United States prisons for crimes committed before the age of 18 and Lolita Barthel is one of them. The United States is one of only a few countries in the world that permits children who commit crimes to be sentenced to prison forever, without any possibility of release. Only eight states in this country Alaska, Colorado, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, New Mexico, New York, and West Virginia and the District of Columbia prohibit life without parole for youthful offenders. Unfortunately, adolescents, like adults, commit horrible crimes and make terrible mistakes. And, like adults, they should be held accountable but in accordance with their age, stage of development, and greater capacity for rehabilitation.
“Juvenile Justice: Too Young for Life in Prison?” by HUMA KHAN shares the story of Cameron William who faces up to 110 years in prison for second degree-murder. William shot at a police officer in Omaha Nebraska and was also charged with robbery and assault in another County (Khan 1). William is shown to have a record of felonies, as a result, he was tried as an adult and idicited. Teens who go to prison throw their life away at a young age but their is no excuse for murder. These people are criminals who happen to be young.
The juvenile justice system has made numerous of ethical issues when managing juvenile offenders. The issue with the juvenile justice system is the laws and rules that govern it. It has led to years of controversial debate over the ethical dilemmas of the juvenile corrections system, and how they work with youth offenders. The number of minors entering the juvenile justice system is increasing every month. The reasons why the juvenile justice system faces ethical dilemmas is important and needs to be addressed: (1) a vast proportion of juveniles are being tried and prosecuted as adults; (2) the psychological maturation of the juvenile to fully comprehend the justice system; and (3) the factors that contribute to minorities being adjudicated in the juvenile justice system are more likely than White offenders.
“Politicians claim that the public has demanded “get-tough” policies, but this demand may often be a transitory response to a highly publicized juvenile crime” (Scott and Steinberg, 2008). January usually represents a new beginning, positive outlook, new goals and shedding last year shortcomings. This was not the case for Lionel Tate, who is the youngest American sentenced to imprisonment for life without the possibility of parole, at the impressionable age of thirteen. Lionel, who was tried as an adult, was convicted of the first-degree murder of his playmate who he viewed as his little sister, six-year-old Tiffany Eunick, on July 28, 1999, in Broward County Florida.
The criminal case I have selected for this assignment is on Justin Morton; who at the age of fourteen years old Morton was the first youth convicted of first-degree murder section 231 CC. Although, The report show that the young man was raised in a healthy and supportive home with his mother and father. In spite of this, Justin expresses to his psychiatrist his impulse and desire for inflicting pain on others; he claims to have no remorse for the murder of Eric Levrack. Not to mention, He also voiced to former classmates that "Eric was annoying, always invading his space. "As a matter of fact, after the killing on April 1, 2003, Morton had turned himself in, he described the event as an open game of trust just before he strangled Eric with a belt.