ipl-logo

Federalist Papers Fifty-Five, Sixty-Three Analysis

535 Words3 Pages

In the Federalist Papers Fifty-Three, Fifty-Six, Fifty-Eight, Sixty-Two, and Sixty-Three, James Madison writes about the proper way to carry out the new form of government, in regards to the Legislative Branch. In Federalist Paper Fifty-Three, James Madison writes, “Some portion of this knowledge may, no doubt, be acquired in a man’s closet; but some of it also can only be acquired to best effect, by a practical attention to the subject, during the period of actual service in the legislature” (pg. 333). This means that serving two terms in the House of Representatives in more convenient because it allows the Representatives to acquire more knowledge. In the Federalist Paper Fifty-Six, James Madison states that some people consider the House of Representatives “too small to possess a due …show more content…

The Senate is also important because each Senator serves six years in office making it difficult for them to “yield to the impulse of sudden and violent passions” and allows them to gain experience and make minimal to no errors (pg. 337). Federalist Paper Sixty-Three emphasizes that having Senators serve six years allows them to be more responsible of the decisions they take while in office. James Madison wrote “It is evident that an assembly elected for so short a term as to be unable to provide more than one or two links in a chain of measures” (pg. 338). In conclusion, these Federalist Papers promoted the importance of obtaining a new government that contained a bicameral legislative branch, unlike the unicameral legislative branch of the Articles of Confederation. They explain the importance of having the House of Representatives to represent the public based on population and deal with the main issues, which are commerce, taxation, and militia. Meanwhile, the Senate is important to maintain equal votes for all states regardless of size and it deals with foreign

Show More
Related

  • Essay On Congress Term Limits

    982 Words  | 4 Pages

    Congressional term limits will allow congress to continue upholding the goals stated in the preamble of the constitution and will greatly benefit the posterity of our nation. One of the most important changes that term limits will cause is a decrease and eventually an end to career politicians who serve in congress for decades losing connection with the general public. According to the heritage foundation “Term limits, by eliminating incentives for careerism, would curb reelection-oriented federal spending which is targeted to particular districts but contributes little to the general welfare of the country” (Greenberg 1994), in summary, term limits would restrict the ability for

    Read More

  • Congressional Limits

    1120 Words  | 5 Pages

    Once their term was complete, they returned to the lives and career in their state of origin (Vance, 1994, 429). Not convinced, refer to Roger Sherman (founding father), “The representatives ought to return home and mix with the people. By remaining at the seat of the government, they will acquire the habits of the place, which might differ from those of the constituents...” (Vance, 1994, 429). Fast forward to Congress of the 21st century, there average term for most congressmen is well over 30 years.

    Read More

  • How California Became Unforgivable Summary

    709 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1990, term limits were about eight years in the Senate and six years in the Assembly. However, in 2010, it went up to twelve years no matter where they are. There was a higher term expectancy, lower switching, and more institutional memory. Term limits allowed for more diversity by representatives and more new ideas to try out coalitions. The problem with short term limits is that there was a loss of “institutional memory” where there is a well-crafted policy and “splashy” policy, to look good in the process.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Congressional Gridlocking

    663 Words  | 3 Pages

    During the formation of the United States, America’s founders decided upon a federal bicameral political system. This ultimately divided the United States government legislature between Federal and State bodies embedded within Congress: the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives. This concept of congressional legislation occurred while large and small states sought to reach a compromise regarding the formatting of proportional representative bodies. In doing so, Congress was given several functions intended to combat corruption, characterized by the application of legislative power, the assurance of equal representation within government policy, and oversight in the Checks and Balance system. However, despite efforts to ensure Congress as

    Read More

  • Comparing The Political Theorists Of Cox, And Mccubbins

    1483 Words  | 6 Pages

    The political theorists David R. Mayhew, Gary W. Cox, and Matthew D. McCubbins argue on how the US Congress functions. They focus on the members of Congress and their actions. The basis of disagreement between the theorists lies in what Congress members find of importance. Mayhew argues that members of Congress, primarily concern themselves with reelection, as such, any action taken only benefits that. Cox and McCubbins’, however, formulate that Congress functions on the basis of majority party control and unity.

    Read More

  • Federalist 10 Summary

    679 Words  | 3 Pages

    Madison begins Federalist 10 by stating that a well-functioning government should be able to prevent and control factions and their effects. A faction is any group of people who hold a shared interest and whose common interest either hinders the rights of others in society or harms society as a whole. Although factions cause confusion and violence to occur in a society, no government will be able to stop factions from developing; Madison states that this is because, in order to destroy factions, one would need to destroy liberty. Along with not being able to abolish factions, Madison asserts that it is impractical to try to control factions because individuals will always have differing opinions; he also articulates that the main purpose of governments is to protect

    Read More

  • The Federalist Papers: Ratification Of The US Constitution

    152 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Federalist Papers The Federalist papers consists of 85 essays written in the late 1780s by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay. The three authors published it in New York newspapers under the name “Publius” to persuade its citizens to ratify the new U.S constitution. These essays argued in support for the ratification of the new U.S constitution by __________________________________. There are 3 well known federalist papers which are no. 10, no. 45 and no. 51.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Presidential Term Limits

    743 Words  | 3 Pages

    Former President James Madison talked about a rotation of offices, a coolness within the senate, and how the lack of limitations would lead to the rise in career politicians while making legislators live as citizens under their own laws. Madison wanted to keep “Career Politicians” from holding a seat of power and becoming corrupt and wrote many speeches and papers regarding the subject. As one of the most powerful appointed titles in the world, term limits will always be

    Read More

  • The Federalist No. 10 Argument

    978 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Federalist No. 10” is a persuasive argument written by James Madison in an attempt to ratify the Constitution. He wrote a series of documents called the Federalist Papers under a pseudonym to convince others to approve of the Constitution. He says that factions are not good for America, neither is a pure democracy. Madison provides extensive arguments and remedies for the problems he is addressing. James Madison is attempting to ratify the Constitution by analyzing the way to deal with factions, comparing a republic to a democracy, and by comparing a small government to a large government.

    Read More

  • Congress Should Have Term Limit In The United States

    453 Words  | 2 Pages

    So yes, congressional members should have term limits because it can minimize the amount of power that an individual can obtain over a period of time. One way congressional members should deserve term limits is that it will increase performance and

    Read More

  • Should Congress Have Term Limits Essay

    411 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are many differing views on the powers congress holds, and congress itself, one such point of view is on whether or not congressmen should have a limited number of terms they are capable of serving, similar to how the president is only capable of serving two terms, and whether or not it would benefit both the people and the government. Congress itself is the legislative branch of the federal government, and as such holds a large amount of authority and power, including putting laws into effect, declaring war, taxing, impeachment, and many other important duties that can be carries out only by congress. Furthermore, members of congress do not have limits on the amount of terms they are allowed to serve, only limits on the length of each term, for those in the house of representatives each term is two years, while in the senate, each term is six years long. I find this to be a matter of public concern because many

    Read More

  • Should The Constitution Have Term Limits?

    497 Words  | 2 Pages

    “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity…” The opening statement of the supreme law of our nation makes the goals of our government clear, and yet we seem to have lost sight of these goals. It is my belief that in order to ensure the goals of the constitution that the 28th amendment of The Constitution must be an amendment instituting term limits on all members of The Senate and The House. Since around the last four congresses we have seen record numbers of house and senate tenures; peaking at a 13 year average for members of the senate. Now of course we may not be having this problem if congressional approval ratings were not at an

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Senate And House Of Representatives

    545 Words  | 3 Pages

    The founders wanted the Senate to view the impact of their decisions at a national level. They wanted the senate to take a methodical approach to voting. Members of the senate remain in office on six-year terms, much longer then their House of Representative counter parts. The idea behind a six-year term is to provide a form of barrier from the people; this allowed the senate to make long-term decisions rather then, what is developing now. Members of the Senate are also required to be a minimum 30 years of age, as opposed to the 25 years of age for House members.

    Read More

  • Machiavelli's Influence On American Government

    950 Words  | 4 Pages

    Congress consists of the Senate and the House of Representatives. “All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives. ”(Article 1 Section 1) Both houses in Congress have representatives from each state, in order to represent the positions and opinions of all fifty states. Machiavelli, however, did not believe in having so many people counselling the leader was effective. Machiavelli explains how it is more beneficial to have ministers than to have nobles.

    Read More

  • Federalist Paper Number 51 Summary

    592 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the Federalist Paper number 51, Madison writes to the people of New York to explain that it is necessary for a separation of powers between the departments of the government. Madison, with the help of Hamilton, wrote the Federalist Papers to explain sections of the Constitution. In Federalist Paper number 51, Madison explains that the government does not have a strong structure on the outside, but creating a firm structure within the government could be a solution. The firmer structure would be the separation of powers. In order for the people to get a better idea and make a more accurate judgement about the separation of powers, Madison shares observations and puts them into simpler terms.

    Read More

More about Federalist Papers Fifty-Five, Sixty-Three Analysis

Open Document