The fourth amendment protects us from many things, including the seizure of our property and possessions and unnecessary frisking. It was created to prevent the government and its branches from unlawfully violating privacy, and that’s how it should work, theoretically. Traditionally, a violation of our Fourth Amendment rights involved a physical invasion, like the seizure of papers or personal items, without a warrant. However, in this day and age, officers rarely need to physically violate this right to gain incriminating evidence. Many government agencies have a few skeletons in their closets when it comes to this. With the introduction of new technology in recent years, the government can discreetly capture evidence from electronic files, …show more content…
United States, tells a tale very similar to the one of Fremont Weeks. Dennys Rodriguez was pulled over at a traffic stop and held for an excessive amount of time. When the police pulled him over, he checked Weeks’ license and issued a warning for the fitful driving and requested to walk his drug-sniffing dog around the car. Rodriguez, refused. Nevertheless, the officer continued to detain him until a backup officer appeared. With the arrival of the second officer, the original officer went to retrieve his dog. While sniffing, the dog detected drugs of some sort. Rodriguez took this to court, and while his claim that the K-9 search was an unreasonable seizure was denied, it is still an impacting case. Edward Snowden is a world renowned whistle blower. He worked with the NSA, doing IT work. During this time, he noticed the depth of the NSA’s constant surveillance. During his time working for Booz Allen, Mr. Snowden started to make copies of classified documents and files, all of which he found disturbing and invasive. These documents were full of the information behind the NSA’s national surveillance, and the amount of files he had extracted was outstanding. He told his supervisor he was taking a leave of absence for medicinal reasons, and took the smuggled information with him. Snowden scheduled to meet with journalists from The Guardian after traveling to China. A few weeks later, these documents were released by The Guardian, and Edward Snowden was the reliable source. Now, people all over knew that the United States Government was spying on its own people through messages, internet searches, browser history, smart T.V’s and many many more. This case is ongoing, as he seeks asylum in other countries. This newfound information raises the question, is Mr. Snowden a traitor, or did he save us all by “blowing the whistle” to warn us about the unconstitutional collection of our private possessions protected by
The writing of Bob Toxen about Snowden is about Edward Snowden. A contractor for the National Security Agency. Snowden’s role was a systems administrator which granted him access to very sensitive top secret data, which is not and should not be shared with anyone outside of the US government. Although Snowden’s role was to keep hackers and other people from accessing such information, it was Snowden who took it upon himself to copy a lot of this top secret data on a flash drive and present this information to the press. Toxen, explains throughout the majority of this writing about how the US government could have tried and prevent the actions that Snowden did.
Unreasonable search and seizure is an asset in this country. It is an asset in this country because the police have to have rules also. If America did away with the fourth Amendment there would not be any crime because the police will be able to arrest anyone without probable cause. The police would have such much power that people will be afraid to even drive through a stop sign.
When Obama was asked if he was going to pardon Snowden, President Obama stated, “I can 't pardon somebody who hasn 't gone before a court and presented themselves, so that 's not something that I would comment on at this point.” In Edward Snowden’s defense, why would he try to go in front of a court where he wouldn’t be given the right of freedom of speech because under that Espionage Act he can’t explain his actions? Another reason why President Obama should give him a pardon is because he’s being charged for crimes he didn’t commit with the Espionage Act. He didn’t sell the information for a large sum of money or give it to enemies, and lastly, he worked at the direction of a foreign government so why is the United States charging him. No one sees the sacrifice Snowden made because he’s giving up more than just information he’s giving up his life for the rights of American
Furthermore, the disclosure disaffirms the authenticity and credibility of government officials’ testimony. While a few months ago the director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, denied that the NSA collects any type of data, General Alexander, the director of the NSA, also rejected that the agency could intercept online communications (Cassidy “Why Edward” par.10). After comparing Clapper and Alexander to Snowden, Cassidy argues that Clapper and Alexander should face charges of misleading Congress. The falsity of officials’ statement distinguishes Snowden as “a man of conscience”, who should be excused and hailed as a hero (Cassidy “Why Edward” par.12).
In the document “Hero or Traitor? Edward Snowden and the NSA Spying Program”, Edward Snowden, exposed various types of spying programs. He exposed these programs because they were invading the people’s privacy and he felt that it was important for the people to know. On June 5, 2013, the very first report, a newspaper from London called The Guardian, reported that the United States National Security Agency (NSA) was collecting telephone records from millions of U.S. customers of telecommunications company Verizon.
Is Snowden an enemy for informing the world of how the US keeps tags on them, or is he a hero for letting the American people know that their 4th amendment is being violated? Some can argue that America’s enemies didn’t need Snowden to inform them, groups such as al-Qaeda have long since figured that out. Because it is almost certain that enemies already know about what Snowden revealed, the only thing he did wrong was violate his oath, and the NSA’s oath of secrecy trumps his belief that the NSA’s activities were an unconstitutional threat to the American people. Even though the NSA’s oath trumps Snowden’s beliefs, it does not mean that what the oath is protecting is constitutional. The National Security Agency has been keeping many people out of the dark for years about their policies.
Amendment 4 states that “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” This amendment helps decrease and limits the police to seize and search people. But
This sort of things …I do not want to live in a world where other records everything that I do and say. It’s something I’m not willing to admit all or today.’’ Edward Snowden, speaking with The Guardian, in June 2013 After reading this a don’t have any question that Snowden is telling the truth, I admire him, he sacrifice his normal life to share this information worldwide, now he is searching for a asylum from any country to live. Seriously I am amaze that he decides to tell the truth and be search by the authorities from the United State than stay quite keeping the secret of these organizations.
He is known for his part in leaking top secret NSA documents leading to revelations about the US surveillance on phone and internet communications. Snowden is now seeking asylum in Russia. He does not have the documents with him anymore as he has handed them over to First Look Media set up by Glenn Greenwald. The US government believe that the documents will never be returned to the NSA which leaves them to wonder what will be the next story to be revealed as not even the government can get access to the documents. Snowden actually tried to leave digital breadcrumbs when taking the documents so that the government would see what documents he looked at and what ones he copied and stole.
Snowden felt that it was his moral duty, so he stated, “to inform the public as to that which is done in their name and that which is done against them”. (Bartleby.com, 2018). From my perspective, he should be back at home and accepted what he did, was wrong based on legally and ready to bearing punishment, however, US government have to change their law, rule, and
In 2013, Edward Snowden rose to prominence after he released classified documents to the public regarding the existence of United States (US) government’s wide spread surveillance programs conducted through the National Security Agency (NSA). Snowden is an American computer expert, a former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) systems administrator and NSA subcontractor. On one hand, Snowden had been called a traitor and charged with violating the Espionage Act of 1917 and committing treason by the US government for leaking state secrets, whereas on the other, he has been hailed as a hero by many for his actions. He currently resides under temporary asylum in Russia and continues to speak about his work. He has brought the issue of whistleblowing
The documents leaked a great number of global surveillance programs. Many of them are run by the NSA and the Five Eyes with the cooperation
The opinions of average people on Edward Snowden are extremely polarized. Some people paint Snowden as a hero, loyal to democracy and exposing the evils of big government (“Securing Our Libery” 5). Other people label him as a traitor, endangering the lives of United States citizens and soldiers, since the enemy now knows more about our intelligence system (Walsh “Privacy Versus Security” 11). It is worth mentioning though, that even though Snowden says that he did everything to protect democracy in the nation he loves, he has chosen to take refuge in Hong Kong and Russia, countries that aren’t exactly known for their focus on democratic ideals (“Securing Our Liberty” 5).
If I were Edward Snowden, I would disclose the information to the media. First of all, everyone has their right in choosing to expose their information. However, the US government and the NSA claimed that, the extensive access of information from citizen is due to the security and safety measurements, but the PRISM plan was an act of “stealing” others information such as content of phone calls. In my point of view, this is violating the human right as the people do not know their information are leak to the government and disrespect to their rights of disclosing of information. Utilitarianism is a theory in normative ethics holding that the best moral action is the one that maximizes utility.
In early June of 2013, the world was shocked with the biggest intelligence leak in U.S. history. The person who is responsible for the massive leak on global surveillance programs was Edward Snowden a ex-CIA and former contractor for the NSA. Through line of his action on releasing classified information was it justified and should he be consider as a whistle-bower or traitor? Some many consider Snowden as a traitor since he broke the law and harmed U.S. national security, but I see him as a hero because for showing us all the government abusive power and wrong doing, also letting the public know what it is going on behind close door of the U.S. government.