Tone can be described as the author’s “attitude and feelings about the audience and the subject matter.” An author’s tone can not only help influence the reader’s opinion of the piece but can also In the essay, “From Ancient Greece to Iraq, the Power of Words on Wartime”, Robin Tolmach Lakoff uses cynical words, informative anecdotes, and blunt humor to enlighten the audience of the dehumanization of the enemy. She uses many specific examples in the text to get her tone and point across, including contemptuous expressions. The author uses very cynical words to discuss her tone in this essay. She says, “Bullets and bombs are not the only tools of war. Words, too, play their part” (14). She also uses words such as repugnant, reclamation, and disparaging very early on in the essay to express her mood to the reader on this topic (14-15). Another example of cynical words that the author uses in the text is “Soldiers, and those who remain at home, learn to call their enemies by names that make them seem not quiet human — inferior, contemptible and not like “us” (14). The author also goes into great detail about how this does not just occur in one part of the world or in one time …show more content…
She tells the story of how during the American Revolution, the British gave the colonists the nickname of the “Yankees” and how they turned it around to “make the word their own and gave it a positive spin, turning the derisive song “Yankee Doodle” into our first national anthem” (15). You can almost hear the tone in her voice when she says “The reasoning is: They are not really human, so they will not feel the pain” (14). The author seemed very irritated and annoyed when she talked about how American soldiers called Iraqis, or “hadijs", “which used in a derogatory way, apparently unaware that the word, which comes from the Arabic term for a pilgrimage to Mecca, is used as a term of respect for older Muslim men”
The war in Vietnam to do this day has gone down as one of the influential and controversial wars in United States history. The war lasted from 1955 to 1975.The nation as a whole began to uproar over the war and the major consequences of the war. There were many reasons why so many Americans were against the war. Public opinion steadily turned against the war following 1967 and by 1970 only a third of Americans believed that the U.S. had not made a mistake by sending troops to fight in Vietnam (Wikipedia). Not to mention, many young people protested because they were the ones being drafted while others were against the war because the anti-war movement grew increasingly popular among the counterculture and drug culture in American society and
An example of tone used was when Carlin characterizes baseball and football with its season; “baseball begins in the spring, the season of new life. Football begins in the fall when everything’s dying.” This gives a great comparison between the two using tone, when reading you can depict the author’s attitude towards the two sports. He does this by comparing the sport’s seasons to the sport by using the words “new life” and “dying” giving his opinion on the works. The author’s tone made it seem as if baseball is an auspicious sport and football as a dangerous, terrifying
Rhetorical Appeals in the Wounded Warrior Project Advertisements The Wounded Warrior Project recruits the aid of the American public to honor and assist injured veterans of the United States armed forces. Through financial aid, the non-profit organization provides programs for the physical and mental injuries of soldiers with little or no cost to the warriors. The organization also offers support services for the warrior’s family (www.woundedwarriorproject.org). Through advertisements, the Wounded Warrior Project hopes to gain the public’s aid to finance the organization’s programs.
Responding to Ryan H. Blum’s: “Dissent and Metaphor Surrounding the Iraq War” Ryan H. Blum’s (2003) rhetorical analysis, “Making the Familiar Foreign: Dissent and Metaphor Surrounding the Iraq War,” investigates the use of metaphoric criticism as rhetoric in the article “Captive Audience,” by Allan Gurganus (2003). Blum (2003) portrays the use of metaphors as an approach to “move beyond the polemic into the artistic” (p.295) and therefore effectively communicate a perspective avoided by the presidential administration. While Blum appears to recognize the use of metaphors he seems to exaggerate their purpose. Although metaphors may often be used to express hidden meaning, Gurganus’ use of metaphors may merely be to provoke thought and consideration
In 2002, then Senator Barack Obama addressed fellow anti-war rallyist by using scesis onomaton to emphasis his views on why invading Iraq is unreasonable. He signifies that this war is an unrealistic decision by saying that “a dumb...rash war” would only cause more tension between nations. Obviously, he was not anticipating a clear answer because he knew that President Bush would not be able to defend his argument on why the American people should fight against Iraq. Obama brings attention to his audience by repeating similar words like “dumb” and “rash” in order to get his point across of how unnecessary this war will be. He establishes that he “does not oppose all wars”, but he does oppose those which add more fuel to the fire.
In this excerpt from Daniel Webster’s address to the loss during the Battle at Bunker Hill, he talks about very emotional and joyful issues. Because of this he alters his tone to sound loving towards his fellow people by appealing to ethos and logos and giving them a sense of hope. He uses specific word choice and vocabulary to keep the piece sounding sophisticated and appropriate for the situation. From the beginning of the excerpt to the end he continues to use a very complex and elaborate sentence structure that also adds to the sophistication of his speech.
In a desperate attempt for peace, as ironic as it may be, we create chaos, resulting in the death of millions at a time. Firearms burn bright in the dim sun, exposing the vibrancy of blood-stained suits. As the bullets penetrate skin, the life of another innocent individual has already been lost. Families never to hear a last, “I love you” before their loved one tragically passes in a loud, chaotic mess. They run towards the danger, knowing exactly what result the soldiers might have gotten in the gamble of life or death.
Many people when they hear the words “Fourth of July” they think about fireworks, cookouts, and sparklers! During the 1850’s it is a day that reminded many of the horrors and injustices in the world. On July 4, 1852 Frederick Douglass, a former American slave and an abolitionist leader, spoke in Rochester, New York about the affectation of celebrating independence. In his speech, “The Hypocrisy of American Slavery” he claims celebrating independence when there are slaves widespread is unethical. To convince the reader of his claim he uses rhetorical questions, word choice and anthesis in hopes to shed light and spark action on the wrongful situation.
Tone, the general character or attitude the author has towards a piece of writing. The tone in “Harrison Bergeron” is represented, by the author, in a number of techniques that writers have in their arsenal such as, satire, irony, symbolism and diction. The author uses Satire many times thought this story to give us something to think about and ponder instead of giving us what we are supposed to think. For example; when he tells us about the ballerinas and how they are held down by weights and how a horrid mask covers their beauty, we are saddened and depressed by the fact that something so beautiful and wonderful has to be covered up and weighted down just for everyone to be normal and the same.
Rhetorical Analysis Frederick Douglass composed a speech for the 4th of July for the citizens of Rochester, New York. He emphasizes the hypocrisy of the American Government in his "What To The Slave Is The 4th Of July?". The people of Rochester thought that it would be suitable for Douglass to write the speech because he was a slave. Fourth of July is a celebration marking America's independence from Great Britain.
People always have opinions on things. Weather it’s about a big thing like who the president should be or about a very little thing like what to have for dinner. In the book, “My Brother Sam Is Dead” by James Lincoln Collier and Christopher Collier everybody has an opinion on what is happening in the book. This is why the author uses tone. Tone helps so that we can receive the character’s feelings and thoughts on the war.
I find Ho Chi Minh’s letter far more persuasive than Lyndon B. Johnson’s. Using ethos, pathos, and logos, he forms a solid argument that supports Vietnam’s stance on the war. He appeals to one’s emotions by expressing the injustices faced by his people, writing, “In South Viet-Nam a half-million American soldiers and soldiers from the satellite countries have resorted to the most barbarous methods of warfare, such as napalm, chemicals, and poison gases in order to massacre our fellow countrymen, destroy the crops, and wipe out villages.” Words such as “massacre” and “barbarous” highlight the severity of these crimes, and invoke feelings of guilt and remorse in the reader. Chi Minh uses ethos to support his logos, or logical, views on the
In Chamberlain's speech, "Why we Fight," Chamberlain utilized many rhetorical devices but pathos is the most powerful appeal due to the fact that it reminded the mutineers of the pride, hope, and fear of join the army into war. The mutineers who are exhausted are wanting to give up the fight because they did not see the possibility of winning the war. Chamberlain reminded the people of what they did so far and brings out their pride through his statement believing that, "we are an army out to set others free (Chamberlain 11). " Chamberlain's description of the army that the mutineers were in made them feel their importance in forming a free country. This becomes a moral boost which makes them truly believe that joining the army for a greater
Tone us pretty much an overall feeling of the story. When you start to break down tone into feelings, you can see how you could manipulate it to express your feelings. Jamaica Kincaid chose to attack loving by the fact that the lecture is advice on life. Ms. Kincaid attacks caring by telling her what not to do. The author attacks strict by not letting her speak very much.
Literary historian Paul Fussell observes that “Every war is ironic because every war is worse than expected. Every war constitutes an irony of situation because its means are so melodramatically disproportionate to its presumed ends.” Situational irony occurs when an outcome is different than what was expected, and the events of August 1914 followed by a four-year stalemate undermined all expectations of a limited war. Even more ironic is that despite evidence to the contrary, men continue to believe that there are inalienable certainties that exist in war, that measurable principles executed in operational lines and masses govern its science. Antoine de Jomini was one such military theorist who believed that war “’is controlled by invariable