According to Seaman (2012), “a virtual workplace is one that is not located in one physical space; rather several workplaces are technologically connected (via telephones, email, and internet) without regard to time zones or geographic boundaries.” There is a wide misconception that gender equality will be answered through telecommuting. “Telecommuting is described as the use of computer and communication technology to transport work to the worker as a substitute for physical transportation of the worker to the location of the work. “(Olson, 2012). Gender equality means that women and men have equal conditions for realizing their full human rights and for contributing to, and benefit from, economic, social, cultural and political development …show more content…
For example, “nearly 60 percent of women engaged in the market work are clustered traditionally in female job service, clerical, and sales position, and women make up approximately 98 percent of all secretaries, typist, and billing clerks.”(William, 1999, p.79-81).This data shows empirical data that documents the “glass ceiling effect” that keeps female workers inadequately represented in executives or managerial roles.
“The general-case glass ceiling hypothesis states that not only is it more difficult for women than for men to be promoted up levels of authority hierarchies within workplaces but also that the obstacles women face relative to men become greater as they move up the hierarchy.”(EAGLY, 2007). ‘Although women make up 46 percent of the United States labour force, the hold only 5 percent of the top level jobs.’’(Williams, 1999).
Women telecommuters are rarely promoted compared to men, however when they are, they experience a slower wage growth upon promotion, referred to as sticky floor. According to Klalie (2013), “sticky floors can be defined as few women observed in the highest cooperative position” (p.16). Both situations have little flexibility and allow most of these women to expect to do paid labour and unpaid domestic
…show more content…
The idyllic telecommuting vision that men “would suddenly develop a taste for house and childcare” just because they are working from home, ignore the traditional gender role differentiation regarding domestic tasks is likely to imply a very different definition of ‘the home’ for male and female telecommuters. A posited reason women decide to telecommute would be to coordinate both work life and home life. Thus continue seeing their selves as having two responsibilities, their work life and catering to domestic needs; because of these two responsibilities female telecommuters more than male telecommuters disperse paid work with child care. However, male telecommuters continue to see their selves as solely doing paid work, separating their paid work with family responsibilities. According to Williams (1999), “male telecommuters tend to have defined work space at home that are physically separated from the house while females tend to do their paid work in central areas of the house such as the kitchen.” Telecommuters expecting gender role to exchange automatically but instead, it becomes more extreme. For example female telecommuters’ primary reason for working away from the office to be hands on in unpaid domestic while doing what is expected from the paid labour; whereas, men telecommute for more job
In today’s society despite of the progress women have reached there are still barriers that are placed in society. According to author “Thirty-four percent of all families headed by women are poor: the rates are higher for African American women, Latinas and Native American women, and the rate has been increasing” (Andersen, 2015, p. 3). The previous statistics reveal that even living in a society were “equality for both genders” is usually advocated, women’s are still suffering the biggest discrimination in the workplace and in society. Even professional women working full time are being paid less than males. Moreover, professional women are continuously suffering from barriers such as the glass ceiling effect this clearly affect women from raising to upper level positions.
Furthermore, Olsson presents us with another alarming fact that show that not only it is almost impossible to get promoted in Walmart, it is more difficult to get promoted if the employee is a female. According to Olsson, “Wal-Mart today has the same percentage of women in management that the average company had in 1975” (5). In other words, the percentage of women in management did not change from 1975, when women weren’t equal in a work atmosphere as they today. Olsson provides statistic that improves her argument and reveals Walmart unfairness.
There are 3,418,059,380 women in the world (Geohive.com, 2015) and yet, women, in 2010, got paid a staggering 19% difference in wage on a universal standpoint (Economist, 2011). Such contributing factors as this (wage), has created an overwhelming notion of gender inequality leading to such things as segregation in the workforce across the globe. Ethos is universally known as the ethical appeal, convincing one of a person’s character (Courses.durhamtech.edu, 2015). The staggering numbers of economic contributions of women compared to men has however, highlighted that there are fewer women to men ratios in the workforce due to the where we live, maternal implications (pregnancies), upbringing and education.
Marston Marryott Professor Morris ENG 112.0041 – Comparative Rhetorical Analysis 25 March 2023 The Elusive Work-Life Balance for Men In families with two working parents, the classic debate infers that women struggle more to achieve a work-life balance. In 2013, Richard Dorment, senior editor of Wired magazine, wrote the entertaining and thought-provoking essay “Why Men Still Can’t Have It All,” that was published in Esquire magazine (617). Using logos and pathos, Dorment provides a father’s perspective of work-life balance, appealing to the male audience.
In a lot of countries, gender plays a big role in the labor market. For instance, in America, the middle full-time compensation for ladies is 77 percent of that of men [4]. In any case, women who work low maintenance make more than men who work low maintenance [4]. Furthermore, among individuals who never wed or have children, women make more than men [4]. It might be hard to explain such contrasts.
Gender Stratification in The Workplace Over the years, women have fought their way through the various barriers thrown at them by society, they are now more educated, matching male participation rates in the labour force and they are seen to create more opportunities for themselves in the workplace. Despite these achievements, gender stratification still exists in organizations and corporations in the 21st century; this paper seeks to analyze the numerous reasons why women remain underrepresented in leadership positions in the workplace and how this causes a trickle-down effect for other females in non-managerial positions. One of the major factors influencing the progress women experience in their career advancement stems from the deep cultural-infused gender stereotypes associated
Gender equality: the pinnacle concept that American society is not-so desperately trying to achieve. Many Americans have convinced themselves that gender equality was remedied by the Nineteenth Amendment and the Second Feminist Movement, and have not considered the thousands of steps that are left on the journey. In recent years, a matter of public interest has been the gender wage gap, stating that women are earning significantly less money than men for doing an equivalent amount of work. Critics of the effort to “break the glass ceiling” claim that a pay gap does not exist, and that if it does, it is because women either do not work as hard, have to tend to their families, or hold lower paying jobs. However, the gender pay gap has been proven to exist in a variety of different forms,
The glass ceiling occurs in many organizations with every intention of the “hush” attitude from the corporate associates. Many male employees are told that it is forbidden to discuss wages with anyone that they work with. Women are found to hold lower-management employment without potential for growth. The authors identified two types of stereotyping found in these types of organizations, descriptive and prescriptive. First, descriptive defines the biological differences between men and women.
Women are expected to be the caretakers and the maids for the home. Any deviation from these roles are seen as unusual and are treated differently because of it. Even if the women do have careers that are as hard and tedious as their male counterparts they are expected. If we the second shift is to be less burdensome for women, first we must rid ourselves of the ridiculous expectations placed on
In an organization, the hierarchy usually consists of a singular or group of power at the top with subsequent levels of power beneath them. This is the commonly used way of delegating staff or members of the organization in most organizations. Corporations, governments, and religious organizations are hierarchical organizations with different levels of management, power and authority. The workplace has sometimes been referred to as an inhospitable place for women due to the multiple forms of gender inequalities present (Abrams, 1991). Some examples of how workplace discrimination negatively affects women’s earnings and opportunities are the gender wage gap (Peterson and Morgan, 1995), the scarcity of women in leadership (Eagly and Carli, 2007), and the longer time required for women compared to men to advance in their careers (Blau and DeVaro, 2007).
There are many examples on how gender roles have changed in society dramatically. However, one might imply that women working has a toll on the children at home. According to Source 2, on the bar graphs, 74% of people agree that having a job makes it harder to raise children since their mom is going to be busy most of the time. Regardless, this argument is not correct to make due to the fact that moms are working to provide for
Specific Purpose: After listening to my speech, the audience will be able to understand the history of the Glass ceiling, what the Glass Ceiling is, how the Glass Ceiling’s existence is ignored by some, and the ideas there are for cracking the Glass Ceiling. Thesis: Women have encountered barriers that block them from climbing the corporate ladder since the beginning of time, and some Americans ignore this ceiling while others come up with ideas to shatter it. INTRODUCTION: I. Attention Getter:
) Abstract Since women have started to become involved in competitive work field, important differences between men and women have emerged. It is clear that men have the more prominent roles in the work environment. Noticeably, men have the majority in science, academia and high-ranking job positions. I believe that everyone, at least once, has asked the following question to herself/himself: ‘is it more advantageous to be a man or a woman in the workforce?’
Over the past 40 years defenders of women’s right have worked hard to assure growth of women's careers, trying to contest what is attribute as ‘the glass ceiling’ which is the invisible barriers that control woman from rising to top positions in corporate context. From the mid-90s European Government firms and private and public organizations have pursued a suit, bringing the recruitment of women at the upper levels of companies. The increasing prominence of leaders like Carly Fiorina, Hillary Clinton, and Condoleezza Rice accentuate the development in gender roles over the last half century. In the first paragraph I will discuss what do you need to be a successful leader and also about how women rises in organizational structures and practices,
When that resource, time, is being used to focus on gender verses productivity the company as a whole suffers. By achieving gender equality in the workplace, companies should start to see a significant amount of financial progression. According to the Workplace Gender Equality Agency, “It can also improve national productivity and economic growth” (WGEA). This statistic can make for a great motivator in the business world. Not only can removing the gender factor reduce the number of barriers associated with females, but it can show that a company is willing to give every employee an equal chance which can lead to attracting newer potential experienced employees of both genders.