Recommendations and Conclusion With all the above discussed, it is possible to ascertain where the GFS presently stands in the face of terrorism, a threat that is undoubtedly evolving. When it comes to the protection of critical infrastructure, the GFS in particular, the United States forgot nothing and learned nothing from the 9/11 attacks. It is not surprising that the GFS is still vulnerable to the threat of terrorism because terrorism is constantly evolving. The evolution of terrorism calls for the evolution of policies, regulations, organizations, and strategies to bring about the increment of protection and security of the GFS. Terrorism has been in existence since time immemorial (Larabee, 2003) but it has stayed in existence up to …show more content…
With the emphasis on these below, the US as a whole can say, "It learned something and forgot nothing" from the 9/11 attacks.
The Evolving threat (based on Kayla's paper) To start with, all the stakeholders in the GFS should understand that terrorism is an evolving threat. Therefore, all policies, regulations, organizations, and strategies meant to combat the threat should evolve accordingly. As seen earlier in the lessons learned section, pre-9/11, the US, as a whole, underestimated the capabilities and the gravity of international terrorists, especially their art of improvising. In history, the fall of the Roman Empire to its long-time enemies (Graetzer, 2013) and the fall of Napolean during the Moscow Campaign (Pesenson, 2006) were a direct result of underestimating the capabilities and the gravity of enemies. The Roman Empire and Napoleon got so confident in their security and forgot that their enemies’ tactics had evolved just like it was with the US in the pre-9/11 times. Even though many thought otherwise, the 9/11 attacks proved to the US that, just like other developed nations, the US was penetrable and vulnerable to international terrorism. The repeat of the horrific
…show more content…
However, homegrown terrorists like Omar Mateen, the San Bernardino shooters, to mention but a few, lived in US local communities, therefore, had neighbors, friends, landlords, etc. which call for local community involvement in the fight against this threat. It is a common phenomenon after an attack by these homegrown terrorists for people in local communities to come out and claim they knew something about the attacker. For example, recently when the Education Facilities, a subsector of GFS ( Department of Homeland Security, 2018) experienced an attack at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, many people, including a neighbor with a video of Nikolas Cruz doing target practice, came forward (Lori, Moriah, William, and Mark, 2018). As discussed earlier, one of the flaws that led to the 9/11 terrorist attacks but later addressed was the lack of inter-agency communication or information sharing between local, state, and federal agencies. However, the evolved threat now necessitates that communication is extended to members of the communities through community-oriented policing (Stamper, 2016). Through community-oriented policing, a cooperative relationship between the law and the community can be established where they both operate in tandem to
On what was expected to be another day for every American became a burning memory in both Americans and America’s history. September 11, 2001 was the day where fear shook America into recklessly declaring war on terror against Iraq. At 8:46 am, the North Tower of the World Trade Center is interrupted by the American Airline Flight 11 by Mohammed Atta and the hijackers (History); seventeen long minutes later, the South Tower of the World Trade Center is also interrupted by the United Airlines Flight 175 by the other hijackers (History). In order to fight for the endangerment of America’s freedom was being attacked, President George Bush and the Bush Administration contrustred an aggressive invasion in the Middle East. In response to this, George
Within this essay logos is expressed numerous times and is shown in a great way. “One recent study found that between 1999 and 2009, 86 terrorist plots against Americans have been foiled.” (Holder, Napolitano, and Clapper, 707) shows they have really dug up some evidence and know their facts. The United States has really stepped up their game after the tragic 9/11 tragedy on keeping the residents of this great country safe. Not only is it their responsibility but ours as citizens of the United States to keep safe and the authors really express this throughout the essay.
A great terror struck our nation September 11, 2001, two aircraft’s hit the world trade centers, killing 2000 people and injuring over twice as many. A third aircraft flew into the Pentagon while a fourth crashed in a rural area in Pennsylvania. This day will forever be engrained into history as one of the worst terror attacks faced in this nation. Nearly three years later, in an attempt to figure out what happened on that tragic day, scholars came together to discuss the possible parallels between foreign and domestic terrorist. The author, Michael Kimmel, outlines the possible cause of the 2001 attacks and offers us a link between both foreign and domestic terrorism.
Every American knows of the horrifying terror attacks that took place on September 11th, 2001, in New York and Washington, DC. The terrorist organization al Qaeda hijacked four airlines and flew two of them into the World Trade Center in New York, and one of them into the Pentagon in Washington. The fourth plane was stopped mid flight by its brave passengers and did not reach its intended target. Innocent civilians were now the casualties of war waged by an extremist muslim terrorist group based out of Afghanistan. The United States had never witnessed any terrorist attack of this size on its own soil previous to 2001.
In his “9/11 Address to the Nation” the 43rd President of the United States of America, George W. Bush assures that America will not be affected by the unruly and evil attacks carried out on September 11th, 2001. The President drafted this speech to resist the impending fear and questioning that American citizens around the country would soon be consumed by. Because 9/11 was the most impactful, yet devastating terrorist attack on the United States to date, Bush was not able to derive his thoughts from others’ ideas and speeches, thus he was forced to dig deep and extract the emotions and thoughts aroused by the “despicable acts.” Much like any great leader, President Bush wanted to stress the importance of instilling a sense of pride and resilience in the country and fellow countrymen and women to come together and remain as one. As the head of the “brightest beacon of freedom and opportunity” President George W. Bush declares that the United States of America will “remain strong” and appear unaffected as the country continues to build and rebound from the senseless acts of terrorism and hate.
The United States cannot afford another 9/11, so that why increase the intelligence efforts in counterterrorism. The terrorist want to harm the United States by any means necessary by learning and readjusting their post 9/11. 2. How effective are modern measures in hardening critical infrastructure and other potential targets?
Throughout history, many nations face trials and tribulations that cause them to fall or grow stronger for the future, and America is no exception to this. When such a trial were to come forth, the president does his best to get an appropriate response out of the American people. In President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “Address to Congress Requesting a Declaration of War with Japan”, Roosevelt tried to persuade Congress, as well as the American public, that going to war with Japan was the right course of action following the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor by Japanese forces. Nearly sixty years, America is once again faced with another trial with the attack of September 11, 2001. President George W. Bush’s “Address to the Nation” speaks about
In fact, according to a study of attitudes towards Muslim Americans post 9/11, after 9/11 “the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) reported a 1,700 percent increase of hate crimes against Muslim Americans between 2000 to 2001” (Khan). While discrimination towards Muslim Americans existed before, after 9/11 the general public’s view of Muslim Americans rapidly declined and resulted in an increase in the Muslim-terrorist stereotype as well as many individuals having to face unwanted hostility. In a study on microaggressions directed towards Muslim Americans, a participant shared, “’A truck driver said to my mom, ‘Say hi to Osama,”’ presuming that because she was Muslim she was associated with terrorism (Nadal). While in another case, a participant described how because his name was Osama, his seventh grade teacher “accidentally” called him Osama bin Laden during attendance, “but [he knew]
September 11 left lasting effects on the citizens of the U.S. As George W. Bush told us, “Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest buildings, but they cannot touch the foundation of
We are maximizing our security, and we are determined to keep this from happening again. Pitts also says, “ you don’t know what we’re capable of. You don’t know what you just started. But you’re about to learn.” Pitts writes this almost as a threat to the terrorists to tell them, they can try again and try to break us but we will get revenge.
Where did these failures occur? Will our country be vulnerable going forward? The events of 9/11 brought a large amount of vulnerabilities to the surface of our country’s security.
It is almost sixteen years since that fear was imposed on us and the age of terror began in earnest. From the moment the Twin Towers fell, 9/11 was seen as a watershed, a historical turning point of grand and irreversible proportions. With the acrid smoke still swirling above ground zero, the mantras repeated constantly were that 9/11 had ?changed everything that nothing would ever be the same.? By now we see those mantras for what they were: natural, perhaps inevitable, exaggerations in the face of
“Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest buildings, but they cannot touch the foundation of America. These acts shatter steel, but they cannot dent the steel of American resolve.” George W. Bush delivered this speech on the night of the September 11 attacks. The shattered steel of the Twin Towers, once towering the New York City skyline, forever changed America and its response to terrorism. The largest foreign attack on U.S. soil appropriately gave reason to Americans to recoil in fear and lose trust in the future, but in reality, the country displayed the opposite reaction.
The first objective of this study is to define and explain community policing as it is currently practiced in the U.S. Community policing and crime reduction is the 4th pillar as stipulated by the Police department under 21st-century policing. According to the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office), community policing refers to a philosophy that promotes organizational strategies, systematic use of partnerships, and problem-solving techniques. This philosophy aims to address public safety issues, such as fear of a crime, any form of social disorder, and others. Community policing is made up of three essential components, the first one being community partnerships. This involves engagement between the law enforcement agency
In accomplishing this mission, prevention is the first imperative of justice. Crime prevention, however, is a multi-sectoral, multi-disciplinary, and integrated endeavour. The term National Security must be viewed in its broadest context in that it is more than just dealing with military threats. It must be viewed as safety from chronic threats and protection from sudden disruptions in the patterns of daily life.