In Gloria Steinem’s, “Our Revolution Has Just Begun,” Steinem addresses many different aspects of feminism, including the myths surrounding it and the hard evidence of sexism in the world today. This is closely linked to standpoint theory, defined as “different social and historical situations give rise to very different group and individual experiences and theories about those experiences” (WL, G-6). Steinem offers many valid criticisms of modern society and the stereotypes and myths surrounding feminism and women’s culture. For instance, she offers two main stereotypes that are common misconceptions of feminism today. The first stereotype is that feminism is only for white women of the middle class, and the second is that the feminist era …show more content…
Steinem mentioned that “’women’s issues’ are mysteriously separated from ‘economic issues’”, and that they are rarely seen as something that goes hand in hand (S, 28). How this relates to standpoint theory is again going on the basis that men see things through a lens that projects the two main ideas as two separate things. Steinem dives into the economic standpoint that if there was equal pay, women would spend more in the US economy and support it instead of “put their money into a Swiss bank account” (S, 28). She also opens up a new case that the idea of work and it’s definition need to be redefined. As a society, being a caretaker for another human being not under an institution is not described as work (S, 28). However, being a care taker is often as taxing as working a regular job and it would be of economic interest because it is less expensive than paid caregiving (S, 28). Seen through standpoint theory, since caretaking has primarily been seen as a woman’s job, the issue has not been seen from an economic standpoint, and is often dismissed as irrelevant because to the majority caretaking is just something women do, when in reality it could have a large effect in bettering the US
It shows that individuals are never defined by a single characteristic. She emphasises the fact that gender is not the only factor which enhances oppression. Through describing the history of the feminist movement in the United States and the history of emancipation of black people, she shows how race is an important factor determining the situation of women of colour. Providing many examples from the beginning of the 19th century up until the end of the 20th century she shows the different forms of oppression that black women have faced and, which have not been addressed by the mainstream movement. In the different parts of the book she makes a clear distinction between how black and white women understood the feminist movement from the beginning.
Alexa Strom April 14th, 2023 WS 247 1002 Words Hood Feminism by Mikki Kendall Mikki Kendall’s Hood Feminism: Notes from the Women That a Movement Forgot, published on February 25th, 2020, offers a bold and insightful look at mainstream feminism and its failure to address the needs and concerns of women from marginalized communities. It is a very thought-provoking novel that exposed me to many issues I had not previously been aware of. Kendall, a writer, speaker, and activist, argues that mainstream feminism has been vastly dominated by affluent and privileged white women. These so-called feminists tend to solely focus on issues that predominantly impact them, such as equal pay and representation in politics while dismissing the experiences
Women want the ability to achieve the same opportunities of a man in the household, educational field, and in the working environment. In “Testimony”, Gloria Steinem explores the idea of not being equivalent to a man, most notably in her use of catalogue and parallelism in order to convince men, women,
The generic feminist movement consists of “white, middle-class heterosexual women” (Tong 42). These women focus on their needs, and neglect the specific needs of many women of color, who are often of a lower socioeconomic standing. White feminists focus on liberating the oppressive “housewife role,” (Tong 214) and fail to even attempt to include minority women who may in fact dream of a life in which they were able to stay home with their children. White feminists “fail to realize that it is possible to oppress people by ignoring their differences” (Tong 214). This issue makes it difficult for many non-white women to relate to or desire to be a part of the feminist movement.
Much of the unpaid care work that England (2005) mentions can be categorized as social reproduction, which is essential for the survival of the population. Women, make up the majority of both paid and unpaid care workers; therefore, gender inequality is impacted by how well care work is rewarded by society. The devaluation framework suggests that care work is poorly rewarded because it is considered to be women’s work. On the other hand, the public good framework argues care workers are paid poorly because the benefits of care work are difficult to quantify. (England, 2005)
“The Female Face of Poverty,” by Maria Shriver focuses on women who are at or near the poverty line. It discusses the issues women are faced with financially, including no paid sick days at work, lack of paid maternity leave, and low wages in general. It also includes poll results of low income women and how their views in life differ compared to the overall population. Shriver wants women to unite in this fight against the poverty they are unfairly faced with. Maria Shriver wants people to become more aware of what low-income women go through due to their lack of fair opportunities in the workforce.
In the articles, Anne-Marie Slaughter, and Richard Dorment, an editor at Esquire Magazine, portray their views on the difficulties on being family care-givers in corporate and government workplaces. Slaughter uses pathos, and logos to portray her arguments on why women cannot have a family and a corporate/government job in today’s society. Whereas Dorment uses mainly logos to address his argument that men too have difficulty when it comes to having a family and a corporate job because some professions are not just male dominated fields but are dominated by women, such as teaching. Firstly Slaughter uses pathos to convey her argument to the everyday woman.
Steinem, Gloria. ‘‘Sex, Lies, and Advertisting’’ Signs of Life in the U.S.A.: Readings on Popular Culture for Writers. Ed. Sonia Maasik and Jack Solomon. Boston: Bedford, 1994.
It is crucial for feminism, specifically white feminists, to acknowledge the shortcomings of the movement. Kendall argues that white women must recognize their privilege and how it can be used to perpetuate oppression. She notes that white women are not just “passive beneficiaries” of racist oppression. Instead, they have actively participated in white supremacy and racism. Throughout history, the myth of white women lacking the power to oppress others has been perpetuated.
According to Steinem, boys and girls need to be equally represented in media so they both understand the importance of not only helping others and benefiting society but also receiving help from those more skillful. This message embodies the goal of true feminism, to empower women and feminize men to advance
How does this all relate to modern day issues? While the aforementioned essay within her book was not necessarily written all too long ago, feminism has changed and adapted to fit in with younger generations. As of right now feminism is currently quite the hot topic throughout the media in both western regions as well as more conservative regions. Oppression continues to remain hidden within “chivalrous” behaviors and ideals as presented by male dominated institutions that attempt to make decisions on behalf of women. Take for example, the war on Planned Parenthood and female healthcare.
Although she loves being a housewife she struggles with societal and personal views of her job. Continuously being considered as second-class citizens, women didn’t have many of the rights males in the US are granted and some cases still do. Women accept
The old feminism is crumbling because it simply does not answer the needs and questions of the 21st-century women. “Women are the equals of men. Men and women are not separate political classes” (Socialist Alternative, 2). Anyone who shares the desire to reduce inequality and promote opportunity must embrace feminism. “If the future is men and women dwelling as images of each other in a world unchanged, it is a nightmare” (Greer, 2).
Liberal feminists argue that women have the same capacity as men for moral reasoning and work habits, but that patriarchy, particularly the sexist division of labor, has historically denied women the opportunity to express and practice this reasoning. These dynamics serve to shove women into the private sphere of the household and to exclude them from full participation in public life. Hence, gender inequality is a hazard not only to the highly capable, talented and deserving women but also to the economy as a whole. Both awareness of the existing gender inequality and implementation of policies that address gender inequities need to be strengthened. Reducing the amount of time women spend on unpaid work is also essential.
Introduction Hook: Since the beginning of time, the existence of women and men has been undeniably considered as one of the integral factors that forms our society as it is today. Despite their parallel existence and contribution to the growth of the society, it was considered that women were not treated equal to men both in domestic and working circumstances, leading to a wave of movements demanding equal rights for women, known as feminism. Despite its success in claiming benefits for mistreated women in the past, recent feminism actions and point of views have gone above their original purpose, and created negative impacts and false mindset as its consequences, 2. Credibility I have done some in-depth research about this matter to prepare for the speech, and I myself do not stand for contemporary feminist. 3.