The first hypothesis , which was that if more people will choose mint over fruit gum, was proven wrong because more people chose fruit . People picked the fruit flavored gum because of how colorful the rapper looked, the color orange is bright and attracting .The second hypothesis for the second experiment is supported by the results , mint gum’s flavor does lasted longer. Mint Gum has mint flavor from plants that helps keep the flavor longer . In the future, the experiment will be , does how many times you chew the gum play a role in the flavors lasting ? A lot of lesson in this experiment, one is that people like different flavor of gum for different reasons, and two not all Gums are the same. Our possible source of error is that we could
If they had eaten it they would not get a second marshmallow. The test showed that a large percentage of the kids who ate the marshmallow did not succeed in their hero’s journey. Also a large percentage of the kids who did not eat the marshmallow succeeded in their hero’s journey. My personal opinion on this is that
I’m going to talk about other researcher experiment on “How long would it take to get to the center of the Tootsie Roll Pop”. Also my point of view on what I think about their say on their experiment about “How long would it take to get to the center of the Tootsie Roll Pop”. On the Tootsie Roll web page they had three scientific studies that have attempted to determined on how many licks it take to get to the center of the Tootsie Roll Pop. The first one is from a Purdue University where a “A group of engineering students from Purdue University reported that its licking machine, modeled after a human tongue, took an average of 364 licks to get to the center of a Tootsie Pop. Twenty of the group's volunteers assumed the licking challenge-unassisted by machinery-and averaged 252 licks each to the center”.
My hypothesis is Clancy’s Popcorn will have the most popped kernels and Pop-Secret will have the least popped kernels. This hypothesis is testable, because I can buy several brands including the ones I mentioned and pop the popcorn and see how many kernels were popped. It could be falsified if I were to test it and record the results, which I will do, and another were to do the same and find different results. My materials are 3 bags of Clancy’s Popcorn brand, 3 bags of Act II brand, 3 bags of Orville Redenbacher brand, 3 bags of Pop-Secret brand, a microwave, and a bowl. I used the original butter flavor so the result was the same according to the flavor.
Each of the five candies has different properties which enables experimenters to distinguish; what characteristics of the candy affect the flow rate, what size candy will flow faster and why, and if smooth materials flow faster. Mini M&Ms as well as M&Ms will be used to differentiate the effect of size on granular flow. Nerds opposed to M&Ms do not have a distinct circular shape and are even smaller. M&Ms and Jelly Beans are fairly the same size they have different shapes, which can aid in discovering what affects the mass flow rate. Gummy Bears on the other hand have a shape vastly different from that of any other candy being used and also do not have a smooth shell covering the candy.
In this experiment, the question that was asked was, are elephants afraid of mice? The hypothesis is if a mouse is placed near an elephant, then the elephant will be frightened. The experimenters traveled to an African safari to perform the experiment with their test subjects (an African elephant and a white mouse). They hid the mouse in elephant dung and rolled over the dung whenever elephants passed by. At first there was speculation that the elephants might have been startled by the moving dung.
As my experiment, I tested 4 students by giving two of the four students a piece of spearmint gum and two students no gum during the test. The students with the gum both averaged a 97. Georgia scoring and 97, and Chloe also scoring a 97. The students who did not have a piece of gum during the test both averaged a 94. Emma scored a 100 and Mackenzie scored an 88.
The experiment was said to last for 14 days but only lasted six after
Sandy's teacher gave her a low grade for many reasons. First of all, she did not form a hypothesis. Also, Sandy did not form questions to be answered after the experiment was over. However, there was one main flaw that highly contributed to her poor grade, which was the fact that Sandy did not have any variables and factors that she could compare her results to. For a well coordinated experiment, Sandy would have formed a hypothesis.
I was once again amazed at my family’s strange yet incredible pistachio eating talent. However, one bowl of uneaten pistachios still remained at the edge of the counter. I immediately thought that it was very strange that this family ate every single pistachio in sight but left one bowl completely untouched. My uncle came into the kitchen and started eating from the full bowl when he paused and said, “These taste weird. Are these really pistachios?”
Understanding the food tasters expertise makes it easier for the reader to
You might not taste the difference, but there are most likely different ingredients in them. In conclusion, the gummy bear lab experiment was a great exposure to osmosis in real life, and I found it very interesting to see the changes in the gummy bears when we were observing and measuring
The third problem is the difference between the tastes
In this lab, human error could have possibly been that the salt wasn’t fully dissolved or even the Kool-Aid wasn’t fully dissolved. To fix this next time, both mixtures can be stirred a little longer. A third human error could have been when putting 20 drops into the test tubes, some drops were bigger than others causing there to be more than mL of mixture in the test tube. At the end of the lab, a red and yellow M&M were used to do a home material test. I dissolved the color off the shell with warm water and placed a dot of each color onto a strip of chromatograph and placed them in two individual
Now it is up to the reader to experience this “experiment” instead of advertising
For this experiment, I purchased two uncooked pizzas that were unsliced and were the same size in diameter. After I cooked the two pizza’s, I sliced one pizza into eights and the other one into sixteenths. My older brother ate three slices of the pizza that was cut into eights, my mother and I ate four pieces of the pizza that was cut into sixteenths. After I conducted my experiment I read the article, The Fixed-Unit Effect: How Socially Consumed Partitioned Food Affects Consumption My Bui by Brennan Davis and Collin R. Payne.