In this “Draft Release of Speech,” Harry Truman was running as a Democratic candidate for the Senate. Truman gave this speech in Missouri on October 1st, 1934, and voiced his opinions about other candidates and the controversies surrounding Roosevelt’s New Deal. In this speech, he champions for higher wages for workers and make farming profitable for farmers. He voices his support for the New Deal and gives his promise to pass legislation that lets the working class prosper. Truman wrote this speech to raise awareness for how the working class should be treated, and question who should be trusted with government power.
Truman grew up in Missouri and at one time was a farmer in the state. Truman did not have a college degree but had served two
…show more content…
Farmers were devastated by this blow, but even bigger was the eventual collapse of the stock market from bad decisions affecting everyone in the United States. President Hoover did find some solutions to help farmers and help those who lost jobs, but Truman would come to side with President Roosevelt to find a better solution, the New Deal. “I shall be with the President in his proposed effort for economic guarantees…. I shall be for any further legislation that…. will advance the standard of living (Truman 6).” He promises to not only support the President’s endeavors but to speak for the farmers that were hurting from the collapse. Truman goes on about his opponent, Patterson, and how he does not support Patterson’s …show more content…
Truman describes Patterson as, “… a heartless and callous attitude toward starving men, women and children in ten million American homes (2)” in response to voting against Roosevelt's attempts to pass relief measures. Patterson would vote for Hoover’s rugged individualism every time, as that was what his beliefs were, but when Roosevelt would try to pass in favor of helping the people who were affected by job loss, Patterson voted against those acts every time. Truman voices his stance, “It is my opinion that any man who has no more bowels of compassion or any more realization that this country was on the brink of revolution at that time than has Patterson, is not fit to sit in the Senate (6).” Truman states that nobody with Patterson’s intentions would not be just for any type of government position. Patterson’s active voting against acts that benefit the public, and his support for the partisans getting richer are not ones not fit to rule in a government position, according to Truman. Truman promises to make the standard of living for the American people, and he plans on doing this by continuing to support the New
President Harry Truman was the thirty-third President of the United States. President Truman was from Lamar, Missouri and he came from a farming family. When he was a young child his family decided to move to Independence, Missouri where he grew up. Turman did not attend college because his family couldn 't afford it so after high school he worked many sales jobs and helped with the family farm. During this time Turman also he served in the Missouri National Guard.
After saving the nation billions of dollars, reforming social security, and practically eliminating job discrimination, President Truman created a doctrine to conduct the way the United States responded to the advance of negative political influence around the world. In addition to the opposition and dark decisions Truman was faced with in World War Two, President Truman was then forced to face a Congress that was the opposite of his executive administration. Not only did President Truman think of how his actions and decisions would effect the nation during his presidency, but also far into its future, as shown through the Truman Doctrine. Richard Neustadt explains this concept quite
When he addresses the steel companies he uses a tone of contempt, expressing his disdain for their decisions. Words with negative connotations like “unjustifiable,” “irresponsible,” “ruthless,” “handicap” describe the actions of the companies. All of those words create a certain atmosphere, especially “handicap” which back then, was a word that had a very unfavorable meaning, it was something no one wanted to affiliate themselves with. While words like “sacrifice,” “stability,” “recovery” and “freedom” are used in association with his audience, the American people. His tone with the people is kind and understanding and conspiratorial, reinforcing the fact that he is on their side.
Fighting the Depression: Following the Great Depression and the crash of the Stock Market in 1929, both Herbert Hoover and Franklin Delano Roosevelt took action by establishing relief programs to help cope with the difficulties that were faced during those rough times. They both had similar goals, but different relief programs. Hoover thought that his methods were best for the long-run, while on the other hand, FDR wanted to provide help to those who were just affected by the Great Depression. The overall effectiveness of the economic programs initiated by Hoover and FDR can be determined by analyzing the outcomes of The New Deal, Second New Deal, FDR’s Recession, and policies
However, he had very different opinions on how the economic state of America should be helped. United States History & Government: Constitutional & Geopolitical Patterns, 2001 had stated about Hoover, “... Republicans followed a trickle-down theory… if government legislation protected the wealth of big corporations and the well-to-do, their continued investments would expand the economy and a better life would ‘trickle down’ to workers and consumers in general” (Document 5). President Hoover believed that the government's involvement in forcing fixed prices, controlling businesses, or manipulating the value of the currency, all of which would eventually led towards
Specifically, Hoover mentions the consequent debt accumulated by “gigantic expenditures”. While Roosevelt’s motive for spending money was to fund programs of direct relief and provide economic security, Hoover reiterated that the debt would have to be repaid and insisted that the “freedom to work for himself is changed into a slavery of work for the follies of government”. Hoover seemingly portrayed FDR as a fraudulent person that was only making economic matters worse. He believed that the government administration was paradoxically jeopardizing the freedom it claimed to
It’s notably argued that ridding both countries would’ve been proven effortless since America had the economical resources and weaponry to implement these solutions. Despite, having this advantage, Truman employs this rhetorical question to imply that this fix is presented as alarming/unsafe to both the country’s soldiers/citizens with the endangerment of America’s freedom being at stake. This frustrated his general, Douglass MacArthur since he believed executing this decision will only confine/tie Truman’s hands by prohibiting the bomb attack against these countries. Above all, Truman recognizes the importance of inspiring the American people instead of discouraging them from involving themselves in this conflict. By showcasing the pedestal on which America and other liberated countries stand, he utilizes an epistrophe to highlight each repeated phrase as it emphasizes the nations to “stand up and fight” and that he showcases them as “champions of
On March 12 1947 President Harry Truman delivered a speech that pivoted America's history and foreign policy. The speech was given during the start of the Cold War and laid out America's response to Soviet expansion in the world. The doctrine showed a change in American foreign policy from self-centered to a more global effort to protect American ideals like democracy and capitalism worldwide. Truman was the Democratic 33rd President of the United States, he was born in Missouri in 1884 and had various jobs before pursuing politics. He took office after President Roosevelt's death in 1945 and stepped up from vice president to president.
Hoover didn 't want to give handouts out, fearing that it would weaken or destroy the national fiber that Americans had, rugged individualism. Eventually, when things got even worse, he compromised and began to assist the railroads and banks, hoping that relief on the big industries would help those under them. In response to this, the people of the nation began to accuse him of helping big businesses instead of individuals who had it much worse off. They accused him of not being able to feed the people of his nation, while in the past, he had sent massive amounts of food overseas to the Belgians. President Herbert Hoover 's policies that anticipated Franklin Roosevelt 's New Deal included help from the federal level for businesses and
Hoover may have been seen as relatively unsympathetic towards struggling citizens, but that is just because they were unable to recognize the attempts he was making to save the nation as a
The press felt that Roosevelt was siding with big business and farmers while leaving out policies that would lift everyone else out of the economic decline. The administration also had to choose between reform and recovery or find a way to balance both without one getting in the way of the other. Roosevelt with his New Deal policies had now created problems between the “classes”. This would be a problem when it comes to big business versus workers and African Americans and women versus the government. Roosevelt had caused another Depression when the economy slipped in 1934 after slight improvement.
Roosevelt believed that he knew of a better way to fix the situation that America was in, but Hoover would not attempt it because he believed that it would cause America to become far more left leaning. His opinion of this would not matter however after he lost the election on November 8, 1932. Hoover’s image at the time was horrible. The people thought that he was useless and was doing nothing to help and were even naming signs of poverty after him as an insult, so when it came time for him to run for reelection he lost by a landslide. Roosevelt knew that the public was displeased with Hoover.
In FDR: Advocate for the American People, David M. Kennedy paints Roosevelt in a bright light by stating, “he had a profound feeling for the underdog, a real sense of the critical imbalance of economic life a very keen awareness that political democracy could not exist side by side with economic plutocracy.” Essentially, Kennedy saw Roosevelt as someone who cared for the American Public and placed the needs of the people first. Kennedy is able to show readers that Roosevelt truly cares for the public when he states that, Roosevelt truly believed that the people could not be “self supporting” and that “without the help of thousands of others, any one of us would die, naked and starved.” By referencing to Roosevelt’s speech, Kennedy is able
He is quoted saying, “I think it will interest you if I set forth the fundamentals of this planning for national recovery; and this I am very certain will make it abundantly clear to you that all of the proposals and all of the legislation since the fourth day of March have not been just a collection of haphazard schemes but rather the orderly component parts of a connected and logical whole.” He came up with the plan as a way to get out of the depression and while it eventually made it to the state and worked, it was met with resistance. The New Deal programs were slow getting into the state because of Eugene Talmadge, the governor at the time. When in the public, Talmadge praised the New Deal and thought it was a good idea but when he was in private, he was extremely critical of it and worked to keep it out of the state (Meyers and Williams). The governor didn’t like how Roosevelts plan involved “…deficit spending and…unbalanced budgets…”
Roosevelt wants them to stand up and do something to better the nation. Lastly, an anaphora can be found towards the end of the speech when Roosevelt says,“The welfare of the wage worker, the welfare of the tiller of the soil….” He uses this anaphora to list the welfare of different occupations. He 's trying to convey the idea that everybody 's welfare is