As a culture evolves to reflect the changing sentiments of a people, so too do the social structures keeping it in place. Regardless of the context, each concept relies on the other for support, thereby ensuring their initial establishment and continued existence. The moment cultural values shift often indicates a broader reconstruction of institutions of power. A new government, for example, must develop a functional social apparatus that not only maintains its power, but also aligns with the ideals of its people. Conversely, major events might lead to an upheaval of public opinion, allowing a society to outgrow its current structures. Historically, Japan’s development as a nation is no different. Social and political paradigms ultimately …show more content…
Already normalized to the customs of court society, Sei Shōnagon judges the worth of those she encounters based on their physical presence. When describing female visitors from the Office of Grounds, for example, she notes that “some of them were not properly powered…[and] their skin showed through unpleasantly” (Shōnagon 22). In this instance, Sei Shōnagon uses their appearances to evaluate “their exposure [or lack thereof] to high society within the capital” (Jones 4). Incidentally, the rank system afforded those in the upper orders special privileges, including access to the court. As a lady-in-waiting, Sei Shōnagon is familiar with the beauty standards of the capital elite. In contrast, the disheveled appearances of the other women indicate their unfamiliarity with the subject, and thus, their lower rank. The act of devaluing one’s worth based on their status is likewise present in other moments throughout The Pillow Book, usually in reference to other social outsiders as well. Provincial governors, for example, are an “undistinguished lot” of “common-looking men not worth one’s attention” (Shōnagon 196). Despite their function within the social hierarchy, their intrinsic value remains inconsequential to the esteemed elite of the court. Though the rank system itself provided an institutional structure for power during the Heian …show more content…
With the end of the Heian court came the emergence of the Tokugawa shogunate, in turn signaling the deconstruction of the original rank system. As a replacement, the new government established a hierarchy based on four social classes. With the samurai holding the highest position, the order of the lower three reflected the importance of agricultural production (McDonald Feb. 6th). Accordingly, merchants, as mere transporters of goods, existed at the bottom most level. However, the rise of a “new social order shaped by the growth of a nationwide market” disrupted the fundamental core of this structure (Kuriyama 71). In a burgeoning economic society, merchants played a vital role in weakening the influence of the bakufu through a strategic understanding of capital. The resulting social tensions, as well as a financial crisis, heralded another end of an era, transitioning Japanese society away from feudalism and toward rapid modernization. During the Meiji Restoration, “Japan came to acquire almost all of the ingredients of a modern state,” including a centralized government, a national economy, and an emphasis on industrialization (Iriye 729). Furthermore, the expansion of education allowed for the political and economic development of the public to better serve the nation “as citizens, producers, and taxpayers” (ibid. 730). Production in this case, however, did not equate to
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries industrialization was a big thing in Japan. This industrialization had economic, political and social effects on Japan. According to document 1, “The Constitution of the Empire of Japan: The Meiji Constitution (1890-1947)one political change was a written constitution was formed. In 1868 this constitution was created to show how Japan is a capable of deserving respect while keeping their own power.
Were Samurais and Knights More Similar Than Different? Let’s go back to the late 400’s and look at the European and Japanese life. Samurais and Knights fought for land and devoted themselves to their master and lord. There are many similarities and differences between a Samurai and a Knight. But, are they more similar than we thought?
Feudalism was a key component of life for those in both Western Europe and Japan. The two systems developed independently from each other yet still held a multitude of similarities. However, their many differences out shadow the unique parallels they shared. The major discrepancies between the two are found in each’s code, structure and regulations. Documents nine and ten, break down the feudal structures of Western Europe and Japan.
Culture, with true consistency, has been continuously evolving throughout human history. Government, technology, and religion have all transitioned in some way over the course of our history, but a strange trend has appeared over the last two centuries. This trend has relatively nothing to do with the development of a specific value in society, but rather it points out the alarming rate at which society has been developing over the last two hundred years. To put this trend in perspective; the industrial revolution, which was the process of mechanizing industry in favor of increasing the output of consumer products, while at the same time catalyzing the process of urbanization, only took place two-hundred years ago - arguably. And in this short
Men farmed their own or nobles land. There were three classes. On the top was the emperor who was supported by the military. 1st was the nobles who were military and government authority. Next were artisans then commoners.
(History.com, “Edo”) The people of Edo followed a strict caste system, greatly impacted by the Chinese Confucian values. The Feudal Japanese Society, people of Edo, was divided into four different castes: the Nobles, the Samurai, the Peasants, and the Chonin. The nobles included: the emperor; the figurehead of society, the shogun; the most powerful military lord, and the daimyos; lords who controlled their own region of Japan. The samurai were the professional warriors who were bound by a code of loyalty and honor to a daimyo.
By the nineteen twenties and thirties, Japan had become a strong country and their economy began to grow and develop rapidly. However, it lacked natural resources such as rubber, oil, coal, and petroleum. For this
Ch. 2 Society (p. 19-43) Aristocracy (p. 19-23) - High-ranking classes including the Emperor and his family. - Regulated laws, resources, punishment, wealth...everything... - Attained through tradition, military service, social standing.
Some historians believe the Ottoman Empire and Japan were relatively different from c. 1750 to 1900 due to the differing political structures, including the stability of each country’s government and means of operation in response to enlightenment philosophy and industrialization. However, due to both countries’ thriving economic structures because of similar reform changes and social resistance against conforming to modernization ideals, their development from c. 1750 to 1900, during which industrialization faced both countries, is drawn to be very similar to each other. To begin with, the adoption of western ideals and enlightenment principles widened the gap between the Ottomans and the Japanese. Not only did the Ottoman Empire suffer massive corruption in the 1800s, prompting its rapid decline, but it also experienced civil unrest across the country as a result of ethnic nationalism, resulting in a weak central government.
The political evolution of countries has been brought by radical thinkers who developed ideas that often challenged the governmental structure and policies of their time. These ideas would eventually reach large numbers of people, and they would often highlight governmental issues present. Consequently, the masses would become dissatisfied with their current place in society and they would revolt. War, political turbulence, and shifting powers would mark these times. While they would sometimes have an overall positive effect on society, they so often had as much of a negative impact on society as they did a positive one.
Japan’s economic development had been shaped in various ways, including Japanese internal forces, and external forces from other countries. Although during the Tokugawa era, the Japanese were very closed off from the world for 250 years, once Commodore Perry and the rest of America threatened Japan with war Japan was forced to open ports for trade. Due to the Japanese lack of weapons the trading environment was very biased on the side of America with unequal trade. The shogun was once a Samurai and is now almost in control of Japan.
The European king and the Japanese shogun were both at the top of their social structures. In European society the king had complete power over everything including military services, land, laws and more. However, in Japanese society there was an Emperor and while he didn’t have much power he was like a god, to whom all respect was directed. The
The Leysu dynasty brought years of peace and prosperity in Japan, including the rise of a new merchant class
The Heian period was denoted as the era of the aristocrats in Japan’s timeline. During this period, women created some of the greatest writing throughout Japan’s history, the most sophisticated and highly desired one being poetry. These poems allowed for an outsider to get an insight of Japan’s society and culture at the time. One of the celebrated author’s of this time was Sei Shōnagon, her most famous work being The Pillow Book. Although her work has been consecutively ridiculed as a poor depiction of the Heian court life, it has also been thought of as comical.
All successful civilizations and societies come from some sort of powerful governing control. During the Tokugawa period, that lasted from 1600-1868 powerful rulers called shoguns stabilized the society (Beck 475). The strict rules and laws of the Tokugawa government impacted and affected every social class and aspect of living in Tokugawa Japan by limiting and controlling the freedom and choices people had. The main goals of the Tokugawa government were to cut off the roots of potential rebellion and to keep the country at peace (Yonemoto).