It is first important to understand a few facts in the case. Hobby Lobby did not deny coverage of all birth control options under its insurance plan. They agreed to cover the contraception options used by the majority of the women, the contraception which prevents fertilization of the egg. Condoms, diaphragms, withdrawal, natural family planning, and hormones causing production of eggs to stop are examples of the first type of contraceptives covered by Hobby Lobby’s insurance plan. Megan Best (2014) says, “We need to remember, then, that the Hobby Lobby case is not about all contraceptives, but only those that challenge the ethical values of those that value human life from the time of fertilization”. Hobby Lobby is a Christian based company who values the human life beginning the moment an egg is fertilized. Because of this belief, Hobby Lobby denied coverage for specific birth control options such as hormonal and copper intrauterine devices (IUD’s) and morning-after pills. Hobby Lobby believes this …show more content…
Ethical to Deny Coverage of Specific Birth control
On one side, I believe it is ethically permissible the Greens and their family, as owners of their Christian based company Hobby Lobby, to deny coverage of specific birth control options which conflict with the company’s religious beliefs. The Hobby Lobby website (Hobby Lobby, 2017) setup to provide information on the Supreme Court case states, “The Greens and their family businesses respect the individual liberties of all their employees. The Greens and their family businesses have no objection to the other 16 FDA-approved contraceptives required by the law that do not interfere with the implantation of a fertilized egg,” the description reads. “They provide coverage for such contraceptives under their health care plan. Additionally, the four objectionable drugs and devices are widely available and affordable, and employees are free to obtain them.” Moreover, Hobby
I am a strong proponent for the wide availability of family planning methods, and women having the choice of if and when they want to become pregnant. I believe that in order for women to be involved with family planning, they need to have contraceptives like birth control readily available to them. Contraceptives are necessary in the world that we live in as they allow women to not have to deal with unplanned pregnancies. It’s also important to realize that some women, who need birth control, don’t have the financial resources to afford the high pharmacy costs. Planned Parenthood is ideal for these women as they are given access to affordable birth control.
Hobby Lobby (2014). The Supreme Court determined that for-profit corporations could deny health insurance coverage to employees for religious reasons.3 This was a poor decision. An employer should not be able to dictate the type of healthcare decisions made by an employee. In Congress, I would support legislation that restores employers’ compliance to provide contraception coverage. Another important type of contraception is emergency contraception such as the “morning after pill”.
The Hobby Lobby store filed the case against the Secretary Department of Health and Human Services stating that the contraceptive method doesn’t match their religious faith. In fact, they were requested to pay the insurance fee. For them, they said that paying for contraception under the Affordable Care Act contradict the federal law protecting religious freedom. According to IIT Chicago College of Law (n.d.), the contraception requirement set by the government were against some religious policies.
The Greens argued that following the contraceptive mandate of the ACA would violate their religious ideals ("Burwell v. Hobby Lobby"). More specifically, the Greens felt it would violate their genuine belief that human life begins at the moment of conception (Morgan). Hence, the Burwell v. Hobby Lobby case was
The owners of Hobby Lobby Stores Inc., the Greens, devoted Christians and married couple who filed a suit back in November 26, 2013. This lawsuit was filed because of what the Green’s had to offer their employees in their health care agreement. Being devoted Christians, it is against most people’s belief to use contraceptives. As a business owner who is closed on Sundays and pays 90 percent more above the federal minimum wage, it 's safe to say that the Green’s mix their religious beliefs into their business and make sure there employees are taken care of. Out of 20 FDA approved contraceptives that are federally mandated, the Green’s had only objection to four of them.
Should corporations be given religious freedom? The case of Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. has opened the door for corporations to deny all kinds of protections and laws to their employees. What if the corporation in question was a car insurance company, and they did not want to cover their employees birth control? Would they still hold the same position if a citizen (or a whole state) claimed religious exemption to being forced to purchase car insurance?
Opinion: I believe with the ruling. I am on the same page with Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. I agree 100% with his writing for the court, which stated that family-owned companies like Hobby Lobby should not be enforced to recompense for insurance coverage for contraception for workers over their religious oppositions. I believe that this ruling is accurate because it means that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 is efficient and does what it says that it does.
In America and The Pill: A History of Promise, Peril, and Liberation, Elaine May Tyler examined the history of birth control in the United States. May traced the pill's conception and evolution the United States through to the twenty-first century. The book consisted of an introduction, seven chapters, and a conclusion. May approached the topic in the context of influence of suffragist and reformer Margaret Sanger's advocacy originating in the late Progressive Era and Cold War American ideology, through to the emerging movements of the sexual revolution and the feminist movement, including acknowledging political, religious, racial, socio-economic, and gender bias factors.
Elaine Tyler May delivers a concise historical retrospective and critical analysis of the development, evolution, and impact of the birth control pill from the 1950s to present day. In her book, America and the Pill, examines the relationship of the pill to the feminist movement, scientific advances, cultural implications, domestic and international politics, and the sexual revolution. May argues cogently that the mythical assumptions and expectations of the birth control pill were too high, in which the pill would be a solution to global poverty, serve as a magical elixir for marriages to the extent it would decline the divorce rate, end out-of-wedlock pregnancies, control population growth, or the pill would generate sexual pandemonium and ruin families. May claims the real impact of the pill—it’s as a tool of empowerment for women, in which it allows them to control their own fertility and lives. May effectively transitioned between subjects, the chapters of America and the Pill are organized thematically, in
Throughout history Planned Parenthood has been in the spotlight of the court. In 1973, the supreme court case Roe v. Wade made headlines when it “ruled unconstitutional a state law that banned abortions except to save the life of the mother” (McBride) The case was brought up by Jane Roe, who said that banning abortions was in direct violation with her 14th amendment right to privacy.
The ACA’s Birth Control Mandate affects large employers. Large employers are those with more than 50 employees. Some of the employers who have religious objections are exempt from the Birth Control Mandate. If an employer qualifies for exemption, the government can bypass the employer with religious objections to birth control. Since the Supreme Court’s ruling that states companies have the right to refuse birth control coverage on the grounds of religious beliefs, the Obama Administration has been finalizing the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) regulations for employee birth control coverage.
This paper will cover Government funding for Planned Parenthood. I will prove why it is fundamental for the Government to fund Planned Parenthood. I will also prove why it is the Government’s moral obligation to fund Planned Parenthood. In July 2015, a Planned Parenthood was recorded talking about aborting a fetus while preserving its organs for medical research.
Planned Parenthood also offers many different sexual and reproductive health services for both men and women. For women, they offer birth control, the contraceptive pill, STD testing, pregnancy care, and abortions when needed. They also offer screenings for breast, cervical, and ovarian cancer. Contrary to popular belief, they also offer sexual health services for men, including condoms, vasectomies, colon, prostate, and testicular cancer screenings, erectile dysfunction treatment, and STD screenings. Many people believe that Planned Parenthood is only for women getting abortions.
Despite the fact that the viability of birth control pills made it the best technique for anticipating pregnancy, it causes various unsafe reactions other than the symptoms that the medicinal group has persuaded in subsequently it must be expelled from general utilization. Body Paragraph 1- Pro argument #1 (At least two in-text references required) Topic sentence 1: Birth control pills ought to be banned in light of the fact that the anticonception medication pill and different contraceptives are making ladies wiped out, handicapping them, and actually executing them. (Jackson 2005)
Culture and Religion seem to be working hand in hand in society, when looking at culture we look at characteristics and knowledge of a particular group of people, defined by everything from language, religion, food, social habits (things that are done natural e.g. saying please and thank you), music and arts. With religion people often use the word to mean the worship of a god or gods. However, some religions do not have gods. One thing that all religions have in common is that they help their believers to find meaning and comfort in the world by using some aspects from that particular religion. With culture and religion playing a big role in our everyday and life choices contraceptives go against a lot of cultural and religion choices and