The Articles of Confederation, written in 1776, were the foundation to a war-based government. At the time of the drafting this was deemed necessary, but years later, it became a burden on the States. A few select men were tasked with the editing of the Articles, to make them more sustainable to the 'modern' times of 1787. However, those men chose to drop the Articles of Confederation completely in favor of a new, improved Constitution.
The men, who proceeded to draft the long-lived U.S. Consitution, justified their decision with various different arguements. However, one could see the repitition that traced through a majority: the blame was to be put on the states. Now, they were not pointing fingers at the individual, but instead voicing
…show more content…
What made it justified was the understanding that there was a need for a new Constitution. While the people were stubborn in their wants, they could comprehend the fact that they were a complete mess. With this in mind, the allowed for the Constitution to take it's place, with some hesitation. The protection of the collective security could potentially harm that of their individual freedoms. With this concern in mind, the men behind the U.S. Constitution found a simple solution: put the people in power. It was the very basic idea that the nation was set up upon in the first place, and therefore, a very elementary solution to the problem of individual freedoms. With a say in the state and national government, through means of executive chairs and status', the people were able to have a representative present with their specific concerns and well-being in …show more content…
Was a new Constitution really that necisary? Of course the answer was yes; with the states being in the 'state' that they were in, many things were put to risk. Foreign affairs, for example, would be hindered due to the inability to be taken seriously as a nation. Riots between states would insue, the overall possibility of falling apart was a major concern. In a letter to Rev. William Gordon, our first President George Washington says this: "...It now rests with the Confederated Powers [states], by the line of conduct they mean to adopt, to make this Country great, happy, and respectable, or to sink into littleness--worse perhaps, into Anarcy and confusion--for certain I am that unless adequate Powers are given to Congress for the general purposes of the Federal Union that we shall soon molder [decay] into dust and become contemptible in the Eyes of Europe..." The point being, he expresses his worries to Rev. William Gordon about the thin line that was the current United States. It could either rise to a higher glory, or fall into a state of no
The Constitution DBQ The Constitution of United States is regarded by many as an important document, for it gave the common people the power to form a government the way they want. Yet, despite all the benefits that it brought to the American people at the time, people also had some concerns about the Constitution such as: it is creating a Central government that is too powerful, only white men that owns property are allowed to vote, not everyone in the nation are treated equally, etc. When the Constitution was first being drafted, Representatives from each state hoped to add terms that would benefit their own states—this lead to a heated debate on how the Constitution should be formed.
My political cartoon addresses the fact that the Articles of Confederation was unable to maintain control over army recruits. The title “The States Gain Higher Ground”, sheds more light onto the flaw, as the states held a high advantage over the national government. The title is a bit metaphorical and literal at the same time, because the State Government is portrayed as perching on upper land much higher than the Congress in my cartoon. This blemish on the national government’s cherished first constitution would have been fatal to the states as its army would become very weak – mainly because the states had the power to decline giving up able bodied men. However, it was not the Articles of Confederation’s only weakness.
“Richard Henry Lee’s Objection to the Constitution” and James Madison’s “The Federalist No. 51” contend about the positive and negative effects of the Constitution. Both essays are important documents for early American history, and both contain valid points. James Madison, however, presents the better argument with his diplomatic, content, and logical approach. “The Federalist No. 51” begins with a question about how America can properly divide government power (Madison 1). Madison believes the Constitution is the answer because it gives the foundations and tools to keeping the power of the government for the people.
Hence Federalists came up with the Bill of Rights as a way to get the Constitution ratified and for people to really see a needed change. The Bill Of Rights which lists specific prohibitions on governmental power, lead the Anti-Federalists to be less fearful of the new Constitution . This guaranteed that the people would still remain to have rights, but the strong central government that the country needed would have to be approved. The 1804 Map of the nation shows that even after the ratification of the United States Constitution there still continued to be “commotion” and dispute in the country.(Document 8) George Washington stated that the people should have a say in the nation and government and everything should not be left to the government to decide.(Document 3) Although George Washington was a Federalist many believed he showed a point of view that seemed to be Anti-Federalists. Many believed that The Bill of Rights needed to be changed and modified and a new document’s time to come into place.
In 1777, after the American Revolution had ended, the new United States of America adopted the Articles of Confederation as the new central government. The Articles made the government weak, powerless, and vulnerable out of fear for tyranny. This system had many flaws and created a lack of unity between the states. As a result, the Constitution of the United States was developed in 1789 to solve many of the problems that arose from the Articles. This new system re-constructed the government into three branches and created a system of checks and balances to prevent the government from becoming corrupt.
Not everything is done correct the first time around. Surprisingly, this is also true for America’s national government. The Articles of Confederation was the constitution of the United States for the first few years of its existence, however, it had many flaws that jeopardized said existence. These flaws included but are not limited to the fact that the national government didn't have the power to tax the states, it couldn't enforce its own laws, but rather only create them, no national currency, however each state had its own currency, a national army could be put in place, and the same goes for a national court. The voting process for each state was also an issue since each state only received one vote which was not fair to
In order to “secure the public good, and private rights, against the danger of [majority] faction, and at the same time to preserve the spirit and form of popular government,” (#10: 45) they proposed the use of an electoral college, which would “refine and enlarge public views” (#10: 46). In order to allow the people to have an active voice in the government while protecting them from the negative aspects of factions, the authors of “The Federalist” proposed the use of an electoral college. Furthermore, Hamilton and Madison agreed that the electoral college should consist of delegates, rather than trustees. Hamilton proposed that the members of the electoral college would take the interests of different groups into account, proving to be “an impartial arbiter between them, ready to promote either, so far as it shall appear to him conducive to the general interests of his community” (#35: 171).
Gabriela Velazques Professor Peshkoff 28 October 2015 The Articles of Confederation: States prevail, Congress fails to The Article of Confederation was a promise for united colonies, but it did not take long for the promise to change. The colonies had no clear intentions of running as a union due to its previous history with Great Britain. Colonies wanted to remain together, just not under one authority. The Articles of Confederation remained as the first constitution of the United States for less than a decade after various disagreements arose between states, and also Congress.
The Constitution had a much stronger centralized government, which enforced democracy. The Constitution was created for the people, to secure the natural born rights, like the freedom of speech. In 1787, the Constitutions final text was finished and was said to have been about 4,200 words in length and on the final day of the Constitutional Convention in 1787 Benjamin Franklin said “I agree to this Constitution with all its faults, if they are such because I think a central government is necessary for us… I doubt too whether any other Convention we can obtain may be able to make a better Constitution.” Soon after the colonies including Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, and Connecticut ratified the constitution, but many states including Massachusetts opposed the constitution because it was said to have lacked reserved undelegated powers to the states and constitutional protection of basic political rights.
Out of this need, the Articles of Confederation were born. They lasted for a short time, but were ultimately too weak to ensure the survival of our nation. We needed a way to keep our nation together, but many people were afraid that a document that gave our federal government too much power would put us in the same position we had just escaped, thus the United States Constitution was born. This document laid out the framework of the government of our nation, laid out the branches of it, its checks and balances, explained its purpose, and very carefully and deliberately named each and every one of its powers. The Constitution did more than that though, it also laid out the basis of the rights of every state of the union, as well as the rights of every citizen of the nation, and stated that our rights are not limited to those listed in the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, rather they are too many to name, and that it is the government that is limited based on what is written in the Constitution.
The Articles of Confederation were drafted sometime between 1776 and 1777 by the Continental Congress. Prior to the Articles of Confederation the Continental Congress “assumed a number of rights and responsibilities, such as creating the Continental Army, printing money, managing trade, and dealing with debt” (Shultz, 2014, p. 119). They had done all of this without the authority of the people or sovereign power, this is why the Articles of Confederation were created. The Articles of Confederation were presented to the states for ratification but only 8 states would ratify it within the first year. It would take until 1781 to get all 13 states to ratify it, which is what it took to before the Articles of Confederation could take effect.
Before declaring independence, John Dickinson constructed The Articles of Confederation as the structure of government between the thirteen colonies. In reassessing the structure of government for the colonies, James Madison, Adam Hamilton, and John Jay under the name Publius, wrote the federalist papers. Publius determined the Articles of Confederation to be defective for three main reasons: the abuse of state legislative power, the absence of executive enforcement, and the articles being a treaty, rather than a constitution. The abuse of state legislative power in the Articles of Confederation allowed government laws to benefit the few, and not the common good of the colonies. James Madison, in the Vices of the Political System of the United States, explains that “A still more fatal if not more frequent cause lies among the people themselves.”
The Articles of Confederation were a document seen as the “first” constitution of the United States. This document granted the new national government power to control the military, declare war, and create treaties between the states. However, the Articles had holes in it considering the government did not have the power to tax, create laws without at least nine states’ approval, or change the Articles of Confederation without a unanimous vote. This means that the country soon fell into debt and petty arguments between state, the new government had no control. It was time for a change.
However this idea was eventually scrapped and they wrote a whole new constitution. This constitution would protect America from tyranny, so they could keep a civilized and united country. The Constitution that was made helped defend America from almost all types of tyranny and is still helping us hundreds of years later. One way the Constitution prevented tyranny is by supporting Federalism.
The Articles of Confederation was an agreement among the thirteen original states of the United States that served as the first constitution. The Articles had first been introduced by Richard Henry Lee in the Second Continental Congress. Although the Articles of Confederation has made its contributions throughout history, the Articles, however, did not last very long and had been proven inadequate from the very start. I agree with this statement based on the examples and analysis of the Constitution I will soon provide. The Articles of Confederation were written during a time when the American people feared a strong national government.