In the case of Mary Barnett, I agree with the courts decision to find her guilty of second degree murder and manslaughter. This is largely based on my analysis of the witnesses presented during the trial and the demeanor and actions of the defendant. Having an associates degree in psychology helped me formulate decisions about the role of each character and what part they were to play during the course of the trial. I utilized the teaching from the text book as well as the concepts from my social psychology class which required me to people watch and analyze the surroundings, body language, and actions of others.
First, let’s start with the prosecution witnesses. They called a neighbor, police officer, and professional psychiatrist. The neighbor was called to attest to Mary’s character and party life style. It helped show that she made bad decisions and had poor judgment at times, but it does not equate to murder. Not everyone who drinks kills their baby. I also found her to be slightly biased by her comment, “I always thought that Ms. Barnett was a disgrace – I mean, she didn’t have
…show more content…
Her dress is blatantly out of character based on earlier testimony of her party life style. At the beginning of her testimony she said, “I don’t remember leaving Alison alone.” (Chaffee, pg. 86) Not remembering is different than I didn’t do it. Mary’s actions throughout this tragedy lead to her guilt. She fully intended to leave her baby behind when she bought a one-way ticket. She had no intentions of coming back. She also attempted to find someone to watch her. Her mother had plans so she found a sitter whom she never showed up for. She even went as far as asking a friend to go check on her house. She knew exactly what she did and wanted someone to find Alison. Then after she returns home and calls the police it is one lie after another. She is not credible and cannot be taken for what she says at the
Why Mary Surratt didn’t deserve the death sentence Mary Surratt wasn’t innocent but wrongly put to death. Evidence used against Mary surratt was sightings of confederates at her house,when it really wasn’t her fault. According to source two, her son john Jr.was a known confederate spy ,and similar characters frequented her boarding house. This piece of information taken from source shows that even if she weren’t involved with any conspiracy she would automatically have been linked to the confederates do to her sons and their connections. Mary Surratt’s boarding house was used as a refugee for blockade runners (source 2).
Although Mary did not know about the plan to murder lincoln she was still an associate. Mary also visited the theater many times the night of the murder. This could have possibly been that she was looking for a good place for it to take place. Secondly, Mary lied to the police.
Mary Surratt should have been executed because she lied to the authorities. Mary lied to the authorities about knowing the people who shot Lincoln. Mary is guilty for Lincoln assassination because she was involved with the people who killed Lincoln and gave them weapons. In source 3, it says “I want you to have those shooting irons ready.” That meant that she had weapons and told the people who shot Lincoln to get them ready.
After reading chapters one and two of the Psychology in Everyday Life book and learning about the four big ideas in psychology, and also while trying to figure out the contributing factors of Andrea Yates’ murder of her children. I have to focus in on and think about big idea two, the biopsychosocial approach, that integrates three levels which are biological, psychological and social/cultural; all together these factors influence and give insight into behavior and mental processes. (CITE BOOK) After reviewing these, the psychological factors that I believe to have contributed to Andrea Yates’ murder of her children are, firstly biological, Andrea had a genetic predispositions, which means Andrea had an increased likelihood of developing
In the case of Tara Brown’s murder, various groups of individuals are affected. As well as maintaining principles of fair punishment and deterrence, the criminal justice system has to consider perceptions of the victim’s family (secondary victim), the community’s demand for crime prevention, and the offender’s rights to a fair court hearing. The most likely outcome is imprisonment for Lionel John Patea due to committing an indictable offence. It is important to note that if this was only a case of domestic abuse without murder, it would utilise more time, effort and expenses to come to a resolution. This is due to the different circumstances and degree of abuse that the judge has to assess.
The Case of Ronald Cotton Sol Ridgeway University of North Texas The Case of Ronald Cotton 10 years in prison, is what Ronald Cotton had to endure for a crime he didn’t commit. Jennifer Thompson in 1984 was a college student making great grades and feeling really good about her future. While sleeping in her bed one night, she heard something in her bedroom and when awoke, saw a man crouched by her bed. The man jumped on top of her, put a knife to her neck, and began to rape.
However, this story of Mrs. Stephens being helpless is all the defense has. But how can you, the jury, believe a story from a woman that would lie to doctors, to police,
"The Trail of Martha Carrier" explained how these "questionable things" were Martha fault. The people that they had confess against here almost made the trail seemed that they community already made up their minds about her innocence. I think you bring up a good point that she is innocent until proven
She turns the court against Mary Warren by telling the court that she sees spirits and claims that Mary summoned the
The opposing side of the argument may say Mary planned on the death of her husband though evidence says otherwise. When Mary went down to the freezer she “took hold of the first object she found” displaying how Mary didn’t deliberately grab a weapon to use on Patrick’s death and his actual killing was not clearly thought-out by Mary, proving diminished capacity and not murder. Mary Maloney deeply loved her husband and her child, through Patricks’ violence push her to her limits. No criminal intent was for sought when Mary’s state of mind obscurely went after Patrick. All in all Mary wasn’t in her right mind whyen all of this took place.
But the mainly because everyone thinks she is a witch. Due to the women in the court room continuously repeating it with details to support, making everybody believe Mary warren is a witch. Mary was the one caught in the dancing in the forest and being accused of witch craft. When Mary was in court she admitted she was witch craft but, also made everyone to think it was an act. In act 2 page 80 Mary Warren is pressured by Proctor to go to court and confess that Abigail is guilty.
Aubrey orr Ms. Roberts ELA __6th_ 15 March, 2017 Was Mary surratt guilty Mary Surratt was the mother of John Surratt who was a spy. Did Mary Surratt deserved to be hanged. Mary surratt should not have got hanged.she maybe should of got a long sentence in prison or something better than getting hanged because she didn 't know booth was going to kill abraham lincoln. All she did was deliver thing to booth because he told her to.
Mary Surratt was accused of being involved in the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln. She was also the first woman in the United States history to be given the death penalty. She was one of John Wilkes good friends, the man who killed Abraham Lincoln. He lived in a boarding house owned by Mary Surratt.
Criminal Justice Psychologist The psychologist is a vital asset to the criminal justice system. The psychologist can examine victims, police officials and various witnesses thus making them ethically obligated to make the right decisions and evaluations. This essay will discuss the roles of psychologist as they work within the criminal justice system. I will Identify and describe the psychologists’ roles within the criminal justice system as it pertains to the applied scientist, the basic scientist, the policy evaluator, and the advocate.
Mary Bliss Parsons: Witch or Bitch? In colonial New England, the Puritans controlled almost every aspect of society and within the framework of that society there were many who believed in witchcraft as an explanation for maladies, misfortunes, and other forms of bad luck which today would be discounted to disease, poor judgement or other causes. Witchcraft, or maleficence as it was sometimes known, was the doing of evil or harm to another person. Many people in New England in the mid-to-late-17th century were strong believers in witchcraft and subscribed all kinds of abhorrent behaviors to being caused by it. Additionally, some were accused of being witches for being unpopular, not showing deference to the laws and customs of society, and