Whoever, therefore, shall determine upon this holy pilgrimage, and shall make his vow to God to that effect, and shall offer himself to him for sacrifice, as a living victim, holy and acceptable to God, shall wear the sign of the cross of the Lord on his forehead or on his chest”-Pope urban II (Directed at the Crusades)
Pope Urban II was a famous pope who initiated the crusades in 1095. Urban II was the pope who influenced many European and French people to join him on his crusade to win back the Holy Land. This essay will prove why the pope changed Europe for the better and what impact he had on the crusades.
Pope Urban II was born in 1035 in France. He was born into a wealthy, noble family. From a young age Urban was taught leadership skills
…show more content…
These people stretched from Christians to French noblemen. Urbans best known speech was delivered on November 27th 1095 in the Council of Clermont. This speech was directly aimed at the French and talked about bringing peace to Christendom. The speech touched the hearts of many with more than 60,000-100,000 French people willing to help Urban fight to get the holy land back. During his great speech he exaggerated the “Anti-Christian” acts that the Muslim people were taking part in. He also said “All who die by the way, land or by sea, or in battle against pagans, shall have immediate remission of sins”-Urban ii. Everybody believed him because he was the almighty pope. Urban’s death influenced many catholic Europeans to look down upon Muslims with disgust and hatred. Robert the monk said “When Pope Urban had said these things in his urbane discourse, he so influenced to one purpose the desires of all who were present, that they cried out "It is the will of God! It is the will of God!” This quote points out how influential the pope was. Even though Urban’s death was unspecified, many Europeans believed that the Muslims had something to do with it. The pope’s influential power had a great effect on medieval Europe as It changed the way Christians viewed and treated the …show more content…
In 1035 he was born into a wealthy family. This put a lot of pressure on him. Urban began his education in a cathedral school at Reims, in North-Eastern France. At the age of twenty, the pope took the position of archdeacon in the diocese of Reims. The pope upheld this position for approximately 12 years. In 1080 Pope Gregory VII announced Urban as the cardinal-bishop of Ostia. This gave the Pope a large following which would help him later on, when the crusades were taking place. The current Pope at the time sent Odo on missions. During one of these missions in Germany, Odo was help captive (1083-1084). Urban’s early life was a vital part of him. If none of this were to happen, he may not have gotten the chance to change Medieval Europe for the
Why did Pope Urban II call the First Crusade in 1095 When Alexius I appealed for aid in the Council of Piacenza in March 1095, it wasn’t surprising that the First Crusade occurred only a few months afterwards, as it was considered by historians “premediate” and resulted from the long-existing opposition to many factors. Building up towards 1095, Christendom was perceived to be threatened both externally by heretical military expansions and internally by the destructive knightly class and the concern for Jerusalem, while Urban was resolute to maximise the papacy’s power, and his own success, through setting the Christian agenda. Since 9th Century, Christendom had been threatened religiously and militarily by heresies, providing Urban in 1095
Allen Cutler’s journal article delves in to the concept of military conflict and conversion to Christianity during the First Crusade. The author states that it was the intent of Pope Urban II who inherited his interest in crusading against Muslims from Pope Gregory VII, to Christianize Muslims, by words and example. There have been those who have argued Urban II had no interest in conversion, but Allen, counters their assumptions by presenting three document sources that imply that during Urban’s speech at Clermont he broached the subject of conversion, by referring to the Turks as “a race utterly alienated from God.” Allen surmises that Urban the implication is they were not “converted to Christianity” and therefore conversion was foremost on Pope Urban’s mind. The Pope also wanted to reinstall papal
In 1095 on November 27 in Clermont,France, Pope Urban the II called for a Crusade to help the Byzantines and free the city of Jerusalem. The official start date was set as August 15, 1096. This order little did he know would be the cause of a battle that turned into 9 war’s that last for nearly 200 years. This event in history clearly has a outcome that is way more negative than positive. Have you ever imagined being in the middle of a 200 year war people dropping like flies just because of an argument over one city?
Cutler cites author R. I. Burns Speculum XXXV, 338, n. 5 as a primary source document in which Urban II encouraged Archbishop Bernard of Sahagun, to “labor zealously to convert Muslims to the Christian faith.” Nevertheless, in an effort to tie Pope Urban’s speech at the Council of Clermont (1095) the author stated that out of five accountings of the speech three of the five hinted towards Urban’s desire for conversion. Here again, Cutler is unable to provide support for his thesis. He cites a correspondence-dated 1088 between Pope Urban and the Archbishop of Toledo, but Cutler does not provide any specific details about the communication in regards to conversion of
Introduction: Provide background information on the Crusades, restate the DBQ question, state thesis with reasons. (include academic vocabulary and underline) The results of the Crusades was probably more negative than positive. In “Doc 4”, It states that “Moreover, the assault of one Christian people on another, when one of the goals of the Fourth Crusade was reunion of Greek and Latin churches, made the split between the Greek and Latin churches permanent.” The Crusades had a lot of hatred to the religions, and by 1204 the Crusaders had lost some of their appeal because the knights agreed to attack the Byzantine Capital instead.
Pope Urban II's speech at Clermont in 1095 clearly exemplifies this. In the speech, he depicted Muslims as violent and immoral and the Crusaders as righteous defenders of Christianity. The speech demonstrated a profoundly religious outlook on life and insinuated that the Muslims were infidels and enemies of God. Although the speech also acknowledged the suffering of Eastern Christians under Muslim rule and called for their protection, it still had a limited understanding of the "other." Despite the hostility towards Muslims by the Crusaders, some historical sources suggest that there were instances of respect and admiration for Muslim culture and civilization, particularly in the later Crusades.
They thought that Jerusalem was their spiritual home and they need to protect it. Their morale was so strong, so that they didn’t fear death. Different battles may prove their morale strength. For example battle of Dorel against the Turks and Seljuk on 1 July 1097, when a small amount of crusaders won a crushing victory over many thousands of Muslims. Obviously Urban II was important figure during the First Crusade.
Pope Urban II’s speech at Clermont in 1095 was a call to crusade given outdoors to the nobles, commoners and church leaders of the Western European Christians (the Franks). The people were moved by this speech and it changed history, launching the first crusade to capture Jerusalem from the Muslim Turks. After hearing Pope Urban II’s speech, thousands of Western European Christians were moved to embark on the dangerous journey and fight in the crusade. I believe the main reasons they were moved and persuaded to fight was; 1) they felt it was their Christian duty, 2) Pope Urban promised them absolution for their sins and 3) they felt compelled to defend Christianity, their holy land and the Eastern Christians.
Fulcher's claim that European Christians should have been protected from Muslim occupation and fierce persecution. As the Roman Realm disintegrated and the papacy lost power and power, moves in governmental issues and religions started. The papacy, under the direction of Pope Urban II, started the battle for more power and power. Amid the time preceding the Main Campaign, the Christian confidence "overwhelmed and directed regular day to day existence to a degree that can appear to be practically unfathomable to a present day eyewitness receptive to the states of mind and biases progressively secularized contemporary society. This religious enthusiasm sustained the "mind-boggling uneasiness: the threat of wrongdoing".
In 1198, Pope Innocent III preached the Fourth Crusade to reinstate Christian lands and recapture Jerusalem. Under Innocent III, for the first time in the history of the Crusades, the pope taxed the church in order to collect money for the war. In this Crusade, advocates followed Richard the Lionheart’s procedure and travel by sea rather than by land. As a result, crusaders leased vessels from Venice. Instead of going to the Holy Land, the Crusaders attacked Zara and Constantinople in order to acquire money to pay their debt and fulfill selfish reasons.
In 1095, Pope Urban the II received an urgent message from the Byzantine Emperor asking for aid in the west. He asked Urban to send the Christian people to claim back the land they believed was rightfully theirs from the Turks (Muslims). Pope Urban said that he had received a message from God to tell the Christians that they needed to go on a crusade. He told them
The Crusades were an imperative part in the religious and military history or all the more comprehensively, the social and political history of both European and Islamic human advancements. They purchased huge quantities of European Christians and Muslims into contact with one another in a battle and dialog that would keep going for a considerable length of time. (Reilly, p. 360) The First and Third Crusades were the best depicted of the endeavors to the Holy Land. The primary source for the First Crusade incorporate the letters of Pope Urban II; the Gesta Francorum (the Deeds of the Franks), which was composed by an unknown crusader who went with the Normans Bohemond and Tancred; the narratives of Raymond of Aguilers, who went with Bishop Adhemar of Le Puy and Raymond of Toulouse; the Alexiad, by Anna Comnena, girl of Alexius, the Byzantine Emperor; and Fulcher of Chartres, who went with Stephen of Blois and afterward Baldwin of Boulogne on the First Crusades. (Reilly, p.
He points out that there is a great amount of unreason in the world of religion and that relying on authority may be dangerous; how do we know that what the Pope preaches is reliable
The Christian View vs. The Muslim View of the Crusades The crusades were a set of different military actions that were sanctioned by the Catholic Church and the papacy. Their intention was to recapture Holy Lands they believed were rightfully theirs from the Muslim people that had invaded it. As any attack on a large group of people would do, every major group was affected. The Christians had their own reasons and beliefs for going on these Crusades.
In spite of that time-frame, the relations between the Middle-Age Empires and the Roman Catholic Church prior to the