After his voyage to the Americas in 1493, Columbus returned from his trip with a good so influential, it would single handedly change the world. Sugar fundamentally changed the economics, power, and demographic of the Atlantic World. Because of the immense demand of the addictive additive, sugar was a highly profitable industry, and with the recent development of trading companies, profit relating to sugar skyrocketed, further fueling the industry. Making sugar required intense labor, which made the Europeans have to find a cheap source of labor that would support the Atlantic World System. They found their workforce in Africa, where slaves could be traded for manufactured goods from Europe. At the root of both these factors layed demand, which …show more content…
As global trade developed, with Europeans sailing to Africa and Asia, traders had to find ways to finance their long and expensive journeys. This financing issue led to the development of the first trading company, an organization where you could buy shares of trade expeditions. Once these companies immersed themselves in the sugar and slave trade, investments and revenue increased dramatically. In his work, Capitalism and Slavery, Eric Williams explains how the newly formed trading firms allowed all people to profit off of the sugar trade. During this period, roughly 10 large firms had monopolized the English slave trade. They began to sell shares in their business, which meant that every person that invested in a voyage would receive part of the proceeds from the trip. The ventures were divided up in many ways, making them accessible to people of all different economic standings (Doc 8). Williams’s explanation highlights how the new structure of shares was made accessible to many, allowing those who were not excessively wealthy to participate in the highly profitable sugar industry. This new introduction of people into the trading system meant …show more content…
Around the same time, the British Parliament was considering taxing imported and exported goods like sugar, an action that could affect the entirety of the British sugar production Samuel Dicker wrote in his letter to the English Parliament about the importance of maintaining a strong trade and production of sugar. Dicker commented on the effects of the possible decrease of production due to taxes: “And should the sugar colonies be so much discouraged…which may enable them from carrying on their works making the quantity of sugar which they do at present… you see plainly how very much our trade and, and how many of our manufacturers would be affected by it.” (Doc 11). Dicker explains that if the British were to affect the trade between the Atlantic colonies, the repercussions would be felt throughout all of society. If the trade was diminished, trade companies would lose profit and so would their common investors, merchants and attorneys. The chokehold sugar had on the economy and the fear of losing revenue allowed the sugar trade to continue freely, which in turn laid the
The Columbian Exchange shaped the Atlantic World. The Columbian Exchange was the start of connection and communication between the two hemispheres of the world through trade from both sides of people, crops, cultures, ideas, diseases, and cattle. The Columbian Exchange started when Christopher Columbus and his crew made land in the Americas. This exchange specifically benefitted Europe the most. Europe benefitted the most because of the new crops that were introduced to them such as maize (corn), potatoes, and tobacco to name a few.
The Sugar act got created in 1764. It lowered the tax on molasses. It listed foreign goods to be taxed comprised of sugar, certain wines and coffee, pimento. “the Molasses Act colonial merchants (people who traded and owned shops in the colonies) were required to pay a tax of six-pence per gallon on the importation of foreign molasses.”
The transatlantic slave trade or triangular trade was a trade system involving Britain, Europe, Africa, America and the West Indies. Goods such as firearms and alcohol were taken from Britain to Africa in exchange for slaves. The slaves were then taken to America and the West Indies where they were exchanged for rum and sugar for the voyage back to Britain. It can be argued that the key reason for the development of the British economy in the 18th century was its role in the slave trade, although there were many other factors involved such as the industrial revolution and the British Empire.
The Sugar Act of 1764 (or Revenue Act) was an attempt to reduce the debt encountered by England after the Seven Years’ War. Prime Minister George Grenville was the one to enforce it. The problem was that merchants and gentry were not pleased with the Act. Consequently, they protested against it. In addition, another Act, called the Stamp Act, was declared a year later.
Sugar Interest The Sugar Interest could be blamed for the Revolutionary War because their initial decision to give the French back their Caribbean colony resulted in a chain of events that caused the colonists to rebel against Britain. The British gave back France’s Caribbean colonies to lower the amount of sugar being produced, therefore having the opportunity to increase the price in the colonies. Britain also began enforcing the Sugar Act, which placed an importation tax on Non-British Sugar and Non-British Rum. As the British Parliament continued placing new taxes on the American Colonies, the colonists began revolting against the crown.
With the help of cheap-slave workers, Southern plantations made their profit-margin greater. Exporting goods to Great Britain. Such as, cotton and tobacco. This was worthwhile, profitable for the Southern, “aristocrats”. The British thought of a plan to mess up the trade due to the fact that they were holding a large amount of British wealth.
It was passed by the British Parliament and lowered the tax on molasses imported from the French and Spanish West Indies. The US history, workbook stated, “ in 1764 parliament passed the sugar act. It lowered the tax on molasses.” In response, the American colonists began boycotting the purchase of British manufactured goods, beginning the struggle for economic freedom. The Sugar Act further contributed to tensions in the colonies, prompting unrest and creating a sense of mistrust and resentment among the colonists.
Many events occurred in the year 1764, including the Sugar Act, an Act meant to better enforce British trade laws, the Currency Act, and James Otis’s “taxation without representation,” which led to a boycott of British goods. The Sugar Act was passed as a result of Britain’s war with France, and the debt it caused. The Act was supposed to help pay for the defense of the colonies as well as the newly acquired territories. The Act increased the taxes on imported sugar, and other items like textiles, coffee, wines, and indigo dye.
The Sugar Act, was made to try and stop the smuggling of sugar and molasses. This tax was given to the people to help settle the debt of the war, and it started an argument of “taxation without representation”. This dispute helped spread the idea of breaking
What Drove the Sugar Trade? The sugar trade began in 1655 and became a big deal to Britain. Wealthy men would buy property, produce sugar, and sell it to their home country for a low price. (Document 7) Sugar was a product that could be bought and sold easily, since it was in high demand.
In the days when slavery was booming and tobacco farming was at its peak, the foundations of America's economy was being built. tobacco farms were the number one producing product in America at the time, it was easy and with the help of the Native American Indians they had been taught to properly grow them. Next to tobacco sales the slave market was among the most frequent and requested transactions in the time period. These relations between purchased slaves and white colonial Americans consumed the trade market in the south. Pictured above is bread crumbs of a foundation being built for a developing economy, the many indentured/life long slaves working are accompanied by what appears to be the many owners and blooming businessmen of the
The colonists violated the Proclamation of 1763 set with chief Pontiac. The Sugar Act was on act to raise money from the colonists. Great Britain needed the money to pay for protection against the Native-Americans. Great Britain started putting taxes on sugar, which made the colonist upset.
Some states thrived under the trade, while others economically deteriorated so drastically that they continue to suffer today. Despite the consequences, the trade connected the world closer than ever before. A main reason why Europeans colonized the New World with such swiftness and determination lay in the drinks of nobles and the soil of peasants. Sugar was in high demand during the 1500s and 1600s, and the fertile coasts of the Carribean and Brazil made for a perfect environment. Sugar cane was just the tip of the iceberg: Europeans soon discovered crops native to the Americas that heavily impacted world economy, a prime example being the potato.
DBQ Essay – What Drove the Sugar Trade? Beginning in the late 1600s and continuing through the 1700s the demand for sugar became incredibly high due to its addictive qualities. To supply the consumers with sugar they were craving, wealthy Europeans established sugar plantations throughout the Caribbean and built a thriving slave industry, so their need for cheap labor could be satisfied. Sugar consumption increased from 4.6lbs to 16.2lbs per capita annually from 1700 to 1770 due to the increasing addiction of the consumers.
Britain needed a way to fix this. They came up with the Sugar Act, a set of taxes to help Britain raise money. Taxes were not a new thing for the colonists, but these new taxes caused big issues. The Sugar Act was suggested by Prime Minister George Greenville.