How Did The Geary Act Impact The Conceptions Of Society On Chinese Immigrants

1927 Words8 Pages

Section 1: Identification and Evaluation of Sources This investigation will examine the research question: “To what extent did the Chinese Exclusion Acts and the Geary Act impact the conceptions of society on Chinese immigrants?”. The Chinese Exclusion Act and the continuation of it (Geary Acts), caused Chinese immigrants to have their reputations tarnished and led to the demise of societal views of Chinese immigrants in the United States.
A document from Congress and signed by President Chester A. Arthur, that outlines the Chinese Exclusion Act, “Chinese Exclusion Acts (1882)”. The origin of the source is the National Archives, a database that preserves government documents. The purpose of the source is to allow the public to view historical …show more content…

The government is involved in the Chinese Exclusion Acts so it makes their perspective pose a potential bias, the government can be defending and hiding things within the source to save its reputation. The limitations of the purpose of the source arise through the possibility of the government using the source to clear its name and show how the Chinese Exclusion Acts were resolved which makes the sole motive for publishing the document, saving the reputation of the government after the acts. The limitations of content are emphasized when looking into how it impacted people because the acts simply do not highlight the reality of the Chinese Exclusion Acts which could pose a limitation to understanding the events that occurred because the documents only provide the context of …show more content…

Chinatown is seen as a place of sanctuary and was positive for the Chinese immigrants. (Library of Congress). Furthermore, the spread of the resolutions brought more people to become exposed to the Geary acts and made the population aware of the issues with the Chinese immigrants. This was seen as a new perspective as they wanted to abolish the Geary Acts. After the resolutions were not passed, more people voiced their opinions. For instance, Rev. Dr. Madge opposed the acts and argued against people like Rev. Dr. Bradford who argued that people in the churches were against the Geary Act (Los Angeles Times,

Open Document