Arthur Brooks, is a world renowned writer, Harvard professor, and columnist through The Atlantic in which he has written several pieces of writing over the years. Four Rules for Identifying Your Life’s Work, talks about four rules that will help you find your marshmallow. It also includes an intended audience of high school graduates and the way it impacts them the most in this whole new chapter in their life. Arthur Brooks' intended audience is about to enter college and he feels it’s important to identify their life's work using these four rules. To begin with, Arthur Brooks develops the idea of finding your marshmallow throughout the entire article. Brooks talks about finding your marshmallow or your purpose of life throughout each one …show more content…
It only takes 4 rules to identify your life's work according to Arthur Brooks. The article Four Rules for Identifying Your Life’s Work is a must read, eye opening article by Arthur Brooks that offers insight on finding your life’s purpose or marshmallow in a simple four rules. Arthur Brooks uses several methods like ethos, pathos, and logos in order to captivate the freshly graduated seniors and to develop the article and his four rules. Brooks also includes several studies, and personal details and accounts to further validate his credibility. To start off with, Arthur Brooks targets newly graduated seniors using logos in his article Four Rules for Identifying Your Life’s Work. Arthur Brooks includes a wide range of studies like the marshmallow experiment with preschool kids, and then the Work, Passion, Pursuit questionnaire. These studies target two different age groups and have two different “tests”, yet still connect to the main point of the article. The studies provide a better understanding of where Arthur Brooks got his rules from and they support his four rules further developing his credibility. Additionally, by including all of these studies, researchers, personal accounts, and data Brooks is able to prove his message, and convince the reader of his four rules. After including stats Brooks includes his take on the matter. Brooks elaborates, “...is a helpful litmus test of whether a job could be or could lead to your marshmallow” (2). Brooks …show more content…
Throughout the entire article Brooks is able to develop a direct emotional connection with the reader by talking about finding your marshmallow within each of his four rules. In each of his four rules he offers a personal story or detail that allows you to personally relate to his life and your own life. To develop this emotional connection with the reader he starts off by talking about graduation ceremonies. Since Brooks intended audience is newly graduated seniors this hits home with readers because they are sitting in the exact same boat that Brooks has described in the article. By doing this he’s making the reader want to read more and in order to keep the reader's attention he provides even more personal stories and details that further attracts the reader. Continuing, about finding your marshmallow, Brooks implies,“My marshmallow wasn’t any of the specific jobs I’ve held, but rather the professional adventures I have enjoyed, the skills I have gained, and the people who have touched my life” (3). This develops that personal connection because he’s giving his own personal life’s purpose which allows the reader to connect and trust the author. Brooks claims, “I think we should seek work that is a balance of enjoyable and meaningful” (2). By making this claim, Brooks is supporting his second rule and also supporting the evidence surrounding the idea of
Using metaphors, a humorous and inspirational tone, Alex Smith’s “Graduation Speech” gives his audience “3 prescriptions” on how to live a great life. Alex Smith uses metaphors throughout his speech. Smith had just began his speech, thanking the director and making humorous jokes about receiving his doctorate degree. He then shares his three concepts of life for the audience. Smith then says, “I was headed to the biggest interview of my life, the NFL draft.”
Furthermore, in reading “The Organizational Kid,” it is clear that despite only a twelve-year difference in age, the generation of Empirical Kids is quite different then the Organizational
Accompanied by evidence and rationalization, Gladwell structures a more reasonable argument that humans control their own destinies with hard work and practice than Epstein supports the opposing
She inserts pathos once again to elicit feelings of sympathy towards the relationship between herself and the characters in the books she read, be it as slaves, housewives, or simply not present in the first place. Seeing as her argument thus far evokes a considerable feeling of empathy for her side of the story, with all of its facts and references, it is a minor letdown that Brooks can hardly be bothered to put in a citation of her information on Columbia’s newest reading requirement. While it is a relief that her argument is not being ignored, she could have proven her point more by describing the significance of Toni Morrison’s Song of Solomon. A brief search for the book reveals it to be about a man journeying to connect with his past and his self-importance. Had Brooks included this one extra sentence, she could have shown the significance of diverse authors and stories in her curriculum, but instead left it ambiguous and seemingly
Malcolm Gladwell's book “Outliers” is one of the most influential success guide book in the world. Outliers is divided into nine chapters and each chapter contains different stories of success and different guides to success. One of the most well-known chapters of Outliers is chapter two; “The 10,000-Hour Rule”. The 10,000-hour rule talks about how 10,000 hours is the estimated amount of time an individual requires to spend to become an expert in any field. Chapter two begins with the childhood story of Bill Joy, who is now a significantly influential computer scientist.
Have you ever wondered if there’s a thing such as “working too much”? In Richard Schiffman’s article “Why we should work less” he writes about the effects working too much has on Americans. Working too much takes a toll on peoples mental health, they could lose their social life, or begin drinking for relaxation, along with many other affects. The author builds an argument to procure the audience that we need to work less. Schiffman creates this argument by using multiple techniques such as using personal experiences from his friends, data to support his claim, and appeals to the audience's sense of logic.
He begins with revealing the gimmicky genre of the commencement speech by fulfilling a “standard requirement of US commencement speeches, the deployment of didactic little parable-ish stories”. His story is as follows: “There are these two young fish swimming along and they happen to meet an older fish swimming the other way, who nods at them and says “Morning, boys. How’s the water?” And the two young fish swim on for a bit, and then eventually one of them looks over at the other and goes ‘What the hell is water?’”.
Adults should stop living in a fast-paced world and slow down, as this could have undesirable consequences for their children. Albert Lamorisse shows us how a child can be emotionally attached to a red balloon due to a lack of time and love. We are living in a society with fathers and mothers working non-stop all day. Some of these parents struggle to fully understand their children. Spending quality time with children is becoming more important because of its benefits in strengthening family ties.
The reader can acknowledge how Singer believes that the primary source of living a meaningful life, is love. Within his novel, the Pursuit of Love, Irving Singer discusses how love is the central definition of what meaning is, as well as further analyzes how love is not a desire to be loved. Nonetheless, Irving Singer would claim that life is not meaningless because humans search for meaning within all aspects of our existence. By solely being alive, individuals find the things that matter to them; therefore, whatever we as individuals believe “matters,” is a prerequisite for our life because it will bring happiness. Irving Singer’s optimistic theories make him an ideal philosopher because he offers an immense amount of insight by discussing how we can add meaning to our lives.
“Be Paid What You're Really Worth,” Retrieved March 24, 2018, from https://www.monster.com/career-advice/article/be-paid-what-you-are-worth Tokumitsu, Miya. “In the Name of Love.” The Bedford Guide for College Writers with Reader, Research Manual and Handbook, edited by X. J. Kennedy, Dorothy M. Kennedy, and Marcia F. Muth, 11th ed., Bedford/ St Martin’s, 2017, pp.
The very basic core of a man's living spirit is his passion for adventure. The joy of life comes from our encounters with new experience” (Krakauer 57). People need to live a life outside of their comfort zone because joy in life comes from new experiences and adventure. We learn from Chris that we need to escape our comfort zone.
In chapter 2, he expounds that in order to achieve success, you must have provided 10,000 hours of attentive work. Throughout this chapter, he goes through successful stories of businessmen and musicians, who have earned the title of a professional. Gladwell introduces us to one of the most “influential people in modern history of computing”,Bill Joy. Joy studied at the University of Michigan, where he collected most his 10,000 hours of intensive work. Without the completion of his hard work, he would have not been able to become a prosperous programmer who would one day cofound the Silicon Valley firm Sun Microsystems.
In his essay, Mike Rose focuses on three personal references to allow his reader to understand the purpose of his work “Blue Collar Brilliance”. To begin, Mike Rose introduces his mother, Rosie, who was a waitress at coffee shops and family restaurants. By allowing the reader to be familiar with
One individual named Joe became to love his work and found his passion loving what he did best. By using this experiment he shows that even though
mentions that we are not special because everyone is. He points out, “... even if you’re one in a million, on a planet of 6.8 billion that means there are nearly 7,000 people just like you” (McCullough Jr). He encourages the graduating class to seek out opportunities, and find unique paths because everyone is ordinary. Being unique in this world is important because it enforces the world to be different, if everyone was the same no one would live a life of their one and have experiences. Being different in this world is good, you just have to go out and achieve it.