How Does Elie Wiesel Use Ethos In The Perils Of Indifference

445 Words2 Pages

The dangers of apathy were stressed by Wiesel in a 1999 address he gave at the White House titled The Perils of Indifference. According to the speech, "to keep quiet when injustices happen is to condone injustice and to undercut human rights everywhere." This statement shows that not stopping racial discrimination when you see it; means that you support it. With his Holocaust experience and the approaching future, Elie Wiesel expresses the need to stop indifference to provide future generations with renewed desire and promise.

Elie Wiesel emphasizes throughout "The Perils of Indifference" how choosing to ignore the suffering of others only produces more misery, more prejudice, and more grief—and it also imperils the very humanity of those who choose to do so. Wiesel also noted that in the …show more content…

Elie Wiesel addresses the audience by saying, "Mr. President, Mrs. Clinton, members of Congress, Ambassador Holbrooke, Excellencies, friends," in an effort to get their attention. He also utilizes Ethos by referring to "my friends" to demonstrate how he is attempting to win the audience's trust.

One method of persuasion is pathos. It's intended to impact the audience's emotions when making an argument. When talking about his early years and his life, Elie Wiesel employs pathos. An example of a Patho is “so much violence, so much indifference.” This is considered a Patho because violence can affect others' emotions in many ways.

Logos is a rhetorical device based on reason and logic. In The Perils of Indifference, Wiesel limited his highly impassioned speech to mainly factual information, which may be quite challenging to accomplish when you were actually present for the incident. For example, when Elie says, "It is so much easier to look away from victims. This is an example of a logo because it is factual that it's more uncomfortable to help others that are victims of racial discrimination and

Open Document