Hillary Rodham Clinton spoke at the U.N 4th World Conference on September 5th, 1995 in Beijing, China. She discussed the approval of women worldwide in regards to decision making, poverty ,violence against women, and the separation of women's rights and human rights. Many people, mostly women, strongly agree with Hillary. She definitely appealed to the women who believe in equality. She uses pathos, logos and ethos to enhance her argument and persuades the audience that women’s rights matter and they should not be violated. Logos. To logically appeal to the audience, Hillary uses logos. “It took 150 years after the signing of our Declaration of Independence for women to win the right to vote. It took 72 years of organized struggle, before that …show more content…
This is a powerful statement because it shows how far we have gotten since then. Hopkins 2 Pathos. “Women are also dying from diseases that should have been prevented or treated. They are watching their children succumb to malnutrition caused by poverty and economic deprivation. They are being denied the right to go to school by their own fathers and brothers. They are being forced into prostitution, and they are being barred from the bank lending offices and banned from the ballot box.” This quote provides some of the many struggles that women face daily. It uses the topic of motherhood, which is an extremely emotional topic, and the complications women have watching their children suffer as they try their best to provide for them. This quote also addresses the fact that fathers and brothers of women, or men in general, deny them the right of getting an education. At one point, simply because the gender roles, women were denied the human right to an education and the right to vote. Ethos. In the speech Hillary uses ethos to make herself seem more credible, so more people would believe she knew what she was talking about. “Over the past 25 years, I have …show more content…
“As an American,” (Clinton 3) Clinton starts off one of her sentences by stating that she in fact is an american and she seems proud to be one. Americans are known for their hard work and dedication. So by confidently stating this, it supports the argument that she is passionate about this topic and most likely will not misinform, or mislead the audience. CONCLUSION Hopkins 3 To conclude, this speech was an extremely powerful, and emotional speech. The use of Logos, Pathos, and Ethos made this speech more moving to the audience, the majority of it being pathos. Hillary discussed the issues women suffer through and the excruciatingly painful experiences women have endured. Hillary used tactics that allowed her to related to women, since she is one herself. She aims to encourage people to halt the violations on women's rights. She appealed to the women who believe in equality, and people who want to make a change to better the lives of women. She believes if we treat each other equally, ideally we will live in a better world. The argument was definitely a worldwide and relatable topic. And the logical, emotional, and credibility used in this speech, strengthened many hearts of the American
Susan B Anthony a woman worthy of praise How did we get to where we are? What makes today so different from yesterday? The people from our past have changed our future. Without Susan B Anthony women today might not be able to vote, because of Susan we all have different views on women, but she has impacted us all not just women. She shows us that one person can change the world.
An example of this would be when Anthony questioned, “Are women persons?” to which she answered immediately after to say that women are, although they are not treated as such. Anthony’s strong use of her rhetorical devices, and use of her ethos, pathos, and logos, is what made the speech so powerful and well-remembered. Anthony’s speeches, along with several other speeches from several other women and their peaceful protests, encouraged America to move forward past their prejudice and accept the fact that women are in fact citizens, and deserve to exercise every right the founding fathers granted
Women’s Suffrage: did or did it not change in America? Alice Paul, a young women fighting for rights, went on a hunger strike in prison to stand up for what she believed in. Paul and other suffragists were arrested and sent to Occoquan Workhouse, in Virginia. These women were fighting for their rights to vote, to be as equal as men.
In 1972, Shirley Chisholm stood before thousands of people and presented her presidential bid declaration speech. Chisholm uses all three of Aristotle’s persuasive appeals. Throughout Chisholm’s speech, she used logos, pathos and ethos. Logos is the appeal to logic in which reasoning and facts comes into play. Then pathos is the appeal to emotions in which she uses words to pull and the heart strings of her audience.
Today, millions of women can implement their rights to vote in all elections in the united states of America, but this (rights) did not come easily to those women who sacrifice their lives to make this happen. In the speech “Address to Congress on Women’s Suffrage”, Catt delivered her message for women’s right from a firsthand account of what she had experienced as a woman living in the United States of America in the 19th century. She advocated for the rights of women to vote because she believes in equal rights and justice for all citizens. The speech was very successful because of the use of ethos, pathos, and logos.
On March 23, 1775, Mr. Patrick Henry made history when he delivered a speech at the Virginia Convention. Mr. Henry's purpose in his speech was to convince the Virginia patriots attending the convention that the only option with Britain remaining was war. Mr. Henry used many rhetorical devices throughout his speech, and with the use of pathos, ethos, and logos he had an effective advantage that appealed to almost every person at the convention. To begin with, Mr. Henry’s speech contains much use of pathos as he relates to the emotions of the people of Virginia. An example of Mr. Henry's use of pathos is when he states, “I consider it as nothing less than freedom or slavery...”.
In nearly all historical societies, sexism was prevalent. Power struggles between genders mostly ended in men being the dominant force in society, leaving women on a lower rung of the social ladder. However, this does not always mean that women have a harder existence in society. Scott Russell Sanders faces a moral dilemma in “The Men We Carry in Our Minds.” In the beginning, Sanders feels that women have a harder time in society today than men do.
She also mentions that women’s rights should be equal to Human rights. This speech was given at the United Nations Fourth Conference of Women on September
Clinton attempts to use propaganda, empathy, and logic to present her point, that women to her audience, and succeeds at it. Overall, the speech is balanced in its argument style and use of rhetoric, such as the factors mentioned above. At this point, Clinton was not a New York senator yet, but only First Lady, yet she used her position to go to conferences, such as this conference, and speak out for women’s rights, as they are the same as human
Caroline Chisholm was an English philanthropist known for her work of female immigrant welfare in Australia. From a young age, she knew she was destined to work for humanitarian causes. She commenced several schools for less fortunate girls overseas and in Australia. Caroline was known as the Mother of Australia and she helped transform the state of life in early Sydney and later influenced Australia more broadly. Caroline Chisholm definitely left a prominent legacy by starting the Australian colonies first employment office for women and later introducing work contracts to Australia.
For example Anthony says, “but this oligarchy of sex, which makes father, brothers, husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and sisters, the wife and daughters, of every household” This is very sad since women and girls should not be ruled or told what to do because they are thought of to be less than man. The constitution is in place to have a unified country not to have an oligarchy of men lead households. The pathos appeal is used to show what suffering women are going through due to men ruling them, and not knowing how to fight back. Susan B. Anthony in her speech also says, “Are women persons?.....and no state has the right to make a law, or to enforce an old law, that shall abridge their privileges and immunities.”, which also connects with the emotions of the audience. She is trying to make people feel bad that women are treated less even though they are just as righteous as men to have the same privileges.
She wants her audience to see how much this means to women in society and how it is a dream for women. She wants them to see it is bigger than many things and not something to ignore. She is effective also in the sense that she is referring to MLK’s speech and thus showing the importance of her words she is stating. She also uses power in her tone to almost attack the values of the members on the International Olympic Committee. She does this by saying that the “IOC’s vote will be a fundamental test of its commitment to women and its own core Olympic values, particularly equality” (Finch).
Hillary Rodham Clinton delivered her speech “Women’s Rights are Human Rights” September 5, 1995 while speaking at the United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing, China with the intent to educate and spread awareness in regards to the rights and treatment of women around the world, while encouraging women to take initiative and highlight the potential women have if presented with the opportunity of equality. Early in Clinton’s speech, she uses the power of ethos to establish her credibility and continues to build upon it throughout, bringing attention to the fact she has had years of experience fighting for change among people of all kinds. Clinton convinces listeners that she has made women’s rights a priority in her life
Then by appealing to pathos, she reminds the world of the horrendous events that occur every day as a result of the inability of girls to speak up for themselves. Finally, she ties in a sense of hope through a shift in tense, as to present that together, everyone can aid in the success of the program in the end. Overall, Michelle Obama’s speech unites the world in supporting the cause for not only a woman’s right to education but also the right to speak up against those who shame them for being a part of the female
Women have basic rights to choose what kind of work they would like to do. Clinton believes that people do many things about women’s rights, but we still need doing more useful things. Sometimes, people cannot find good ways to solve issue of women’s rights. For example, in China, more and more women do not have sufficient rights. This issue cannot be solved easily, because of society and history.