The election of 1800 was a crucial turning point in America’s history. This election was different from the start, Thomas Jefferson and Burr began campaigning against John Adams and Pinckney thirteen months prior to the election; there were campaign attacks, counter-attacks, political mudslinging, and personal attacks from both parties. This election completely changed presidential elections and the method in which we vote for president and vice president. The Electoral College went through a significant change after the government saw the holes that were left in it by this war of an election.
The Electoral College condenses the population’s vote for the President of the United States into 538 electoral votes. After all the votes are tallied,
…show more content…
The candidate with the most votes became the President, and the runner-up assumed the role of Vice President. The first design of the College lasted through four presidential elections before political parties began emerging in the United States. The 12th Amendment changed the College to take into account political parties overriding state loyalties. Because the President and Vice President could have opposing political ideologies, cohesiveness executive branch was non-existent. The only portion that has not changed within the College is each State’s legislature has the power to choose its electors …show more content…
Thomas Jefferson and Burr ran against John Adams and Pinckney, Jefferson and Burr had more support because America began to lean away from the conservative view for a more democratic party. Because Jefferson and Burr each received seventy-three electoral votes, Adams and Pinckney were out of the running. At first, it seemed to only be a small electoral technicality, but when the Federalists began to back Jefferson’s running mate, everything changed. The general public sided with Jefferson, but the federalists backed Burr because of his belief in a strong central government. Because they received the same amount of electoral votes, a tie breaker in the House of Representatives was required. Jefferson won the presidential election of 1800 by 10 votes in the House of Representatives
There are many proposed plans to run the government and decide the next president. Ideas including the District Plan, the Proportional Plan, the Direct Popular Election, the National Bonus Plan, and the National Popular Vote plan are in mind to fix the current system yet none have been decided. Currently, the president is decided by a method known as the Electoral College; however, this method has many disadvantages. In the United States today, the government runs a system known as the Electoral College.
Some similarities and differences between Thomas Jefferson’s election and those of today are; back then who ever got the second most votes became vice president. Unlike back then the president now chooses who he wants as his second in command. This is important because it means that the president and vice president can mesh together more and be a better team. Another difference is each party used to nominate 2 candidates for presidency. Today each pery chooses 1 candidate to run for president.
Trump won 306 electoral votes and 46.1 % of the popular vote (62,979,879 votes) over his running mate Hillary Clinton, according to CNN. In the 1800 both Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr were tied at 73 electoral votes, recorded from 270towin, but Thomas Jefferson ended up being declared the presidential winner. In order to accurately compare the elections of 1800 and 2016, it is necessary to compare the candidates of both elections. Frequently people draw similarities to Trump and Aaron Burr, as both are portrayed with the same characterization.
A book by Edward J. Larson, tells about strange and one of the biggest effective elections that ever held in United States of America history. The campaigns was first all Americans. the campaign and the competition literally was creating the new future. As it been said by Larson it is ‘The Second American Revolution’ since it solved many unresolved issues about the government to be formed (Larson ). The competition of the election caused a lot of tension between the two parties.
Should the Electoral College be replaced with a direct national election? In order to understand this question, we must first understand what the Electoral College and a direct national election are. The Electoral College is basically a body of people representing the states of the US, who formally cast votes for the election of the president and vice president. This group of people is made up of 538 electors who are chosen or appointed by a larger group and a majority of 270 votes by these people are required to elect a president or vice president.
Change in the United States After The Election of 1800 The newly formed United States faced an pivotal moment for the political system during the election of 1800. With the rise of political parties, politicians, citizens, and the media pushed for their party’s candidates to receive the most elector votes. The House of Representatives eventually decided the outcome of the election due to the unforeseen equal number of votes to Republican running mates Jefferson and Burr. Consequently, important congressmen, both Federalist and Republican, faced the challenge of deciding the new President of the United States.
The Electoral College had an interesting part in the election of 1824. By this time, the Federalist Party was no longer, which meant the United States was being dominated by the Democratic-Republicans, who led the one party system. There were four candidates running for President in the election of 1824. These candidates were Andrew Jackson, Henry Clay, William Crawford and John Quincy Adams. Andrew Jackson was the winner according to the Electoral College, with ninety-nine votes.
The President is chosen from a group of electors which are picked from the states. Each state gets an elector for every member that state has in congress. The presidential Candidate who receives the state's most popular votes receives electoral votes. The framers were afraid of the public being manipulated by a tyrant and wanted to prevent them from coming to power. (Patterson, 2015, p. 378.)
Consisting of 538 electors, a majority of 270 electoral votes is required to elect a President (NARA). Representation in the college is directly proportionate to the number of Congressional members your state has, one for each Senator and Representative. When a citizen casts
The Electoral College system is the method by which the President of the United States is elected to office. Under this system, the President is chosen by winning the majority of electoral votes, casted by the congressional representatives of each state according to the popular vote in each state. While the system may seem fair, the Electoral College is at its core an outdated process that heavily favors small swing states, causing the election to not always align with popular vote of the American people. The necessity of the Electoral College for the means of electing a President is no longer relevant in the United States, as the motivations for establishing the system were specific to the time of early America.
In the United States during a presidential election the Electoral College is used to formally vote on who should be president and vice president. The United States uses the Electoral College was designed to prevent repetitions of inconclusive elections and was written in the Constitution under the Twelfth Amendment, in 1804 (Ginsberg 386). There has been controversy concerning the Electoral College however with some candidates winning the national vote but losing the Electoral College vote. The Electoral College is defined “the presidential electors from each state who meet after the popular election to cast ballots for president and vice president” (Ginsberg 386). The Electoral College is comprised of 538 electors that have been selected from their designated party.
In short, the Electoral College was a solution to the question: “How should we pick our president impartially?” Much like any other point in the early American Government system, there was a long, arduous process of deciding who should be able to choose. Congress, State legislatures, and popular vote were all considered for the job, but none of them would suffice (Kimberling). This was because there was a definite threat of corruption in the government in its early stages of implementation in all three options. And so, a “Committee of Eleven” was created to provide an “indirect election of the president” (Kimberling).
Electoral College has maintained for hundreds of years and it’s time for a change because of the more and more serious problems it is causing. These are some reasons why we should consider replacing this system with a new more efficient one. Firstly, Electoral College creates the possibility for the candidate who loses the popular vote but wins the electoral vote to become president. In the much-publicized election of 2000, Vice President Al Gore beat Governor George W. Bush by more than 500,000 votes in the national popular tally but lost in the Electoral College because of a last-minute, 537-vote margin in Florida .
Each elector must cast one vote for President and one vote for Vice President. In order to win the electoral college, and be nominated as President of the United States, the candidate must gain 270 of the 538 electoral votes. In an instance where no candidate receives the 270 votes needed, the House of Representatives
Electoral college has been with us since the birth of the constitution, and to this day we are still using this type of system to this day. The Electoral College is a system that the United States uses to elect our upcoming presidents and vice presidents. Each state has electors equal to their senate member and house of representatives, however who ever gets the highest popular vote in the state gets the electoral vote. The issue is the Electoral College do not give votes to the people, but to the states. Which has some unfair consequences.