In the year 1981 America lost a beloved actress, Natalie Wood. Her death was ruled an accident by the original coroner, but upon further investigation the case was reopened. New evidence was discovered that changed the way the case was looked at, including conflicting reports, new analysis and new evidence. These factors could change the initial ruling and put to rest a case that has been dormant for 30 years. One of the first new pieces of evidence was a new analysis of the bruises on Natalie Woods arm, neck and wrist. These bruises were first thought to have been acquired by the actress trying to climb into an inflatable lifeboat, but upon further investigation, it appears that they may have been sustained before that. According to …show more content…
First of all, when it comes to determining where the bruises on Natalie's arm, neck and wrist came from, there should've been the use of another medical examiner as well as the one previously used. This would have brought in two separate opinions and could have possibly opened a new avenue for investigation. Along with this point of the investigation, it seems as though the captain of the yacht was not interviewed as a witness to begin with. With his statements about foul play and the use of drugs and alcohol that night, this also could have helped push the investigation further and open up additional leads. Also, the fact that he overheard arguments and foul language could have been a sign that things escalated into violent behavior. Throughout the investigation, you can also see some tunnel vision right from the start. As soon as the investigation began, the police immediately assumed that it was an accident, simply because the story seemed to fit. The deck of the boat was slippery, Natalie was drunk making her balance questionable, the boat was moving, and so on. Investigators didn't even think to begin questioning any witnesses simply because of this. As stated earlier, the lead detective stated that he had no reason to believe it was a murder. He immediately assumed that the story fit into place and that everything played out just as it was described to him. Speaking to the witnesses, it took more than 30 years later for anyone to begin taking statements from witnesses, such as Marilyn Wayne. Her and her boyfriend were on a boat just miles away from the “Splendour” and heard someone crying for help and other voices coming from the boat. The Wayne’s accounts, along with the captain of the boat who heard the sounds of discord and fighting before hearing that Natalie took off in a life boat and didn’t return, are all signs of potential foul play or at
Although the autopsy performed at 11:00 am on August 15th leads investigators to believe that the manner of death is natural, there are motives gathered from each person. Alex Garcia’s fingerprint matches the minutiae of the one found at the scene. If the death was unnatural, he would be a top suspect, because he was seen with Garcia the night before her death discussing paperwork. He is in fact, Garcia’s former husband and remarried to Piedmont soon after the falling apart of their relationship. During the autopsy, Garcia had her ring on the right hand, signifying that there was no tension between the two.
The police investigation was weak, investigators focused on the idea that the murders
Claiming that the coroner's classification of a suicide was “no more than an extremely improbable theory, yet he had advanced it as a solid ‘finding’.” Peter White’s findings could only be justified by the proof that no other party was or could have been involved. However, Campbell pointed out that “... there was no evidence positively precluding the involvement of another party. There are too many uncertainties in the evidence (due largely to deficiencies in the police handling of the case) to allow any positive finding as to whether or not another party was involved.” Campbell said that right from the start “I believed she had been murdered”
Essay Response #11 Equivocal death investigations are generally open for further discussion because the case could be either a homicide or a suicide based on the crime scene and how it is presented (Geberth, 2015, pg 1055). A lot of the times in these situation the crime scene is staged and not what it appears to be so investigators, medical examiners, and forensic pathologists must evaluate the situation in a critical manner hoping the conclusion they come to will serve rightful justice to those who were wrongfully done. Geberth’s Practical Homicide Investigation provides a few cases that were undetermined and considered equivocal death investigations like case 2.
There have been many people who have looked into the case of Karen Silkwood. One investigator had seen skid marks along with the incredulous dent in her back bumper. That indicated that another car had forced Silkwood into a culvert (“November 13, 1974). Considering the fact that they was evidence that there was another car many people said that is was indeed murder. Even Bill Silkwood,Karen Silkwood’s father, deducted that she was murdered exclaiming that he needed to learn who killed his daughter (Bashke 194).
The case of the Borden’s is a spider web of mystery. There’s so many different possible things that could have happened. From the documentary titles, and even a few movies it’s easy to see that most lean towards the assumption Lizzie Borden is guilty, but I hope to change that today. Yes she has done some suspicious things after the event that has her up on the podium as an axe murderer, but would a woman of her stature be able to swing an axe at such a close range? And with such force?
James previous felonies did not help with convincing them of his story. “..a career criminal who’d been convicted at least four separate times for robbing a cafe, a taxi, a post office, and a grocery store.” With his bad record, it didn’t suit him at all for him to say that he is innocent. These previous felonies were not good at all for backing up his story. With this being said, James didn’t have proof that he wasn’t the killer but never stopped trying to prove otherwise.
The Case: There are cases that could be quite simple to determine, but due to insufficient know-how and equipment, various parts of the case are left unsolved, or investigated in a rush with the aim to perhaps prevent case backlog. While backlog is a huge impediment to the judicial system, justice is in fact fundamental and thus more important. This case involves a murder charge that might have been overlooked due to unexplainable ineptness of the investigators who failed to handle things in the right manner. Pam Shelly and Ronnie Hendrick had an unhealthy relationship which might have been abusive. Pam dies in mysterious circumstances, of a bullet wound.
Guess what Bridget was not questioned. Lastly, little was known about the murderers, but they just assumed that she did. There was no evidence that she did it she was just blamed. People might say that she had a motive and that is enough to prove it.
After a twelve-hour interrogation, Brenton Butler confessed to the murder of Mary Ann Stephens. A key claim made by the defense attorneys in this case was that this was a false confession, and after reaching a verdict of not guilty, the jury clearly agreed. The factors that led the false confession were laid out in a scene during the documentary. Instead of using the interview to discover the truth, the interrogators specifically sought out a confession from the suspect. They began the interrogation with the presumption that Brenton Butler was guilty.
The first big hole was the fact she slept through the murder. One would surely have to be a sound sleeper for that to be true. Yet, she goes onto claim how she woke up two different times
“Black Dahlia murder solved? Shocking new details about aspiring actress Elizabeth Short’s life and gruesome death.” Foxnews, 21 December 2107, http://www. foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/12/21/black-dahlia-murder-solved-shocking-new-details-about-aspiring-actress-elizabeth-shorts-life-and-gruesome-death.html. Accessed 17 February 2018. “Patrick S. O’Reilly.”
There have been numerous cases where false conviction has ruined someone’s life. This too, happened to Tammy Marquardt (Wynne), a middle-aged woman currently 43, who had lost all three of her sons during her early twenties due to the false charges of smothering and murder that imprisoned her. It changed her life completely. She would have never expected to go from being a regular single mom to being a criminal, but she did. This is her story.
Pamela Foddrill: Examining the Investigation Introduction The tragic abduction and death of Pamela Foddrill beginning on August 18th, 1995, relied on investigators from the Indiana State Police, FBI, multiple Greene County police agencies, and Greene County Prosecutors to arrest and convict the five individuals who committed this heinous act. Those who were arrested and eventually convicted for different criminal offenses are Roger Long, Jerry Russell Sr., John Redman, Wanda Hubbell, and Plynia Fowler. One could look at the investigations these agencies completed and evaluate them in two phases, forensic evidence and investigative processes.
Throughout history the Legal System has faced many cases dealing with poisonings. In 2003 the case of Cynthia Sommer and her husband Sgt. Todd Sommer of the United States Marine Corps finds a contradicting case of poisoning. You will see the main problem is that the study of the body shows there must of been a poisoning ,but in the trial itself there is no evidence of the poisoning. doctors initially said that Sgt.