How the Healthy-Hunger Free Kids Act of 2010 Changed American Views of Nutrition In 1991, the USDA announced the Eating Right Pyramid. It was made to be a visual representation of what a person’s diet should consist of as recommended by the federal government. This so-called food pyramid received criticism before it was ever revealed and long after. Despite this, it would serve as the model for the United States for 20 years until the advent of MyPlate in 2011. The switch to MyPlate was part of American schools' much larger nutrition reform. The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids act of 2010 sought to increase the quality of nutrition children received from school lunches. This reform and the food model change that came with it shifted the American …show more content…
It is not shaped like a pyramid, but rather depicts two circles; one represents a plate that is split into four quadrants of different food categories, and the other to the side represents a cup of milk. One major emphasis of my plate was the visual representation that it served as The MyPlate model changed a lot of the things that the previous pyramid models had received criticism for. It was made to be easier to look at and visualize next to a real plate of food, especially for children or their busy parents. It is not made to be a 3-dimensional model and has no hierarchy between the food groups. While it can't be said for sure, it is likely that this was a direct response to the HHFKA. The dramatic change in school nutrition standards sparked a need for a food model that matched and was easy for children to …show more content…
The plate design is a better model for ease of use when compared to the previous pyramid-shaped models. The simple graphics used for MyPlate make it easier to understand. As a result, it is more likely to be used and the impact food models are supposed to have will be more effective. If it were not for the HHFKA MyPlate may never have been made and nutrition guidelines may still be the more complicated and controversial pyramid
Also the websites states the need for plenty of healthy food choices for children instead of cheaper, more calorie-packed alternatives (“Looking for Info?”). This is where federal food programs come into play and can make a difference in children’s lives. Children are dying day after day due to hunger and these food programs can stop that. These federal food programs can keep kids healthy and can make a difference in the future and life they will continue to
Sometimes, it is as if we’ve truly forgotten the true purpose of why it is that we eat. With this section, Pollan continues to add onto the doubt and uncertainty of the way that food is in modern times, based upon how it used to be. Slowly, he is beginning to warm up to his main
“The school lunch program, begun in the 1970s as a result of bipartisan federal legislation, has been by most measures an enormous success. For lots of poor families it’s become a way to count on at least getting one decent meal into their children, and when it disappears it’s catastrophic,” (page 224) In the essay “Schools out for the Summer” Quindlen writes about the problem of hunger in the USA.
This shows the impact on how important it is to make a priority in eating and making well balanced meals. Being able to see the history in how eating habits have changed generation to generation gives an insight on what we need to change. Many people such as Mark never ate a fresh vegetable until 19 years old. This shows that there is a big gap in eating balanced and healthy meals because of the mass production of frozen and canned foods. Mark Stated that, “it cut down on the variety of food we ate” (Mark Bittman 2007 Ted Talk, transcript 10:17).
As Woolston (2015) clearly conveyed, “Fatty, unbalanced, and oversized: That, in a nutshell, is the American diet.” With an escalation in fast food restaurants numbers, health food prices, and portion sizes, the typical American diet relics as a death sentence, encompassing fat, cholesterol, and sodium filled meals. Americans typically consume food that occurs quick and inexpensive, not comprehending the effect that this food deposits on their health. Apprehending the impact that the American diet places on health, the “Dietary Guidelines for Americans" serves as a guideline to help Americans rid of their old habits, reaching towards a healthy diet and weight.
Over 30.3 million kids in the U.S. alone eat free or reduced price school lunches, these lunches were meant to keep kids full and happy through the day but that might not be the case anymore. Millions of kids go to school every day and a big part of the day is when the students are able to eat lunch and socialize, but a problem not many people think about at school plagues the lunch room. Schools offer many different assortments of foods, including the high processed and fatty foods and snacks that not only can cause health problems, but can cause kids to feel sluggish throughout the day. School lunches need to include more organic and locally grown options instead of the highly processed foods currently served, because the it does not provide
During President Nixon’s term he strengthened the school lunch subsidy program up to 25 million children. Subsidies were given to school districts to make sure that every child was fed at lunch time. Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan both made cuts into the National School Lunch Act that led to school districts having less money to spend on lunches. This was in line with their party’s political stance which was to lessen the central government. The lower amount of money led to a decrease in nutritious food and an increase in processed food meaning higher caloric and sodium intake for children across the
Also, it lowered the amount of processed foods and sodium in school lunches (Hirschman & Chriqui, 2013). In addition, the number of eligible children registered in school meal programs was raised by about 115,000 children (Hirschman & Chriqui, 2013). The most significant positive outcomes of the HHFKA was the addition of a nutritional education requirements, inclusion of local school wellness policies, and appointment of an official to each educational agency to implement and enforce local wellness policies (Edwalds,
Many children just eat what they want, they often do not put much thought as to what exactly is going in their mouth whether it will make them sick and drowsy or not they simply eat what their mouth desires; which, in most cases among children is not necessarily the healthiest. Which is why people like Michelle Obama has decided to act on the topic of child obesity “over the past three decades, childhood obesity rates in America have tripled; that nearly one third of children in America are now overweight or obese—one in three” (Obama 350). These statistics are terrifying as they are but the fact that they will continue to rise if people don’t begin to educate children is perhaps even more alarming which is why we need to increase the education among children as soon as possible. But the education of children doesn’t start at school it starts with the parents who are choosing what to feed their
It recommends meals containing fewer calories, less fat and salt, and more fruit, vegetables and whole grains. Most parents would agree these are excellent goals. This shows that 1 in 3 American children were overweight. Although the program that Michelle Obama made is helping kids eat more fruit and vegetables so they could grow healthy. In conclusion, American parents should enthusiastically join first lady Michelle Obama’s campaign for healthier school lunches.
The Child Nutrition Reauthorization Act (also known as Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act), established in 2010, is a 5-year renewable act that strengthens nutrition levels throughout schools. It imposes new restrictions on certain foods that could lead to childhood obesity across the United States. Since 2010 there have been limitations on milk, whole grain, and sodium. The Child Nutrition Reauthorization Act is constantly working to improve the health and eating habits of millions of public and private school students.
Obesity rates have risen, our food has been modified, and production in America has drastically changed. This book has open the eyes of many Americans, so that they may take a stand and fight for what’s right. The people deserve to know what they are buying and what they are eating. And that's exactly what they don't want you to know.
In the article, “Are Our School Lunches Healthy Enough?” by Rice William, the author question whether our school lunches are healthy enough. He discusses the Hunger-Free Kids Act, a campaign originated from first lady, Michelle Obama, in 2010 to help fight childhood obesity, which affects 1 in 3 Americans . It can escalate into diabetes and heart disease, which can make a childs life worse and cost the nation millions.
Intro Name: Natasha Torres In the nonfiction article, “ Are Our School Lunches Healthy Enough?” by McClatchy-Tribune News Service. This article is about how the first lady wants to change school lunches to be healthier for children although the school nutrition do not like her campaign. Michelle Obama’s program should be banned because the school’s lunch is already healthy enough for example, some people are grossed out by the school lunches, some are disappointed, and some say parent can not be trusted.
It is clear that the new food is not reaching the children’s standards. Schools face the challenge to serve healthy foods appealing to the students on a budget. According to Elizabeth Harrington, in the article “1M kids stop school lunch due to Michelle Obama’s standards”, The Government Accountability Office (GAO) “released a wide-ranging audit of the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act nutrition standards last week, finding 48 out of 50 states