The United States is an ever-evolving country that learns and benefits from not just its mistakes but right doings as well. Imperialism is the policy of extending the rule or authority of an empire or nation over foreign countries, or of acquiring and holding colonies. Many imperialists claimed moral responsibility as the reason to expand American land claims, the anti-imperialists decried it because of the negative effects on the colonized. In both camps, the issue of race relations was the source of most similarities and differences. The pro-imperialist group felt it was the duty of the American race to colonize others and subjugate those peoples without offering citizenship, while the anti-imperialists felt it was unfair to foreigners to …show more content…
A generation earlier, the American idea of manifest destiny fueled American colonization of the West. At that time expansion fever exploded for reasons of national pride, acquisition of resources and foreign competition for the land. Around that time the American border reached the Pacific coast, European nations started to colonize much of Asia and Africa acquiring the resources and global power their countries desired. The American imperialists believed it was their duty to join in the frenzy or lose any opportunity for expansion to foreign competition. Imperialists also cited an alleged duty for whites to colonize others. They felt that a mission to civilize and Christianize others was a perfect justification. (doc 3). They also believed that other races were unfit for self-government (doc 5). The belief was often held by Republicans, like McKinley and Roosevelt, who supported big business as a party policy. Big business would appreciate political imperialism to aid their economic imperialism (the dominance of foreign markets and production by American companies). These paternalistic attitudes towards colonized people made it easy for imperialists to justify taking the territory and not granting citizenship to the …show more content…
These anti-imperialists feared a lack of freedom for other races and for their own democracy. Many believed that the steps necessary to enforce government on foreign people was undemocratic and opposite to true American ideals. In doing so to the Philippines, Cuba and Puerto Rico, Americans were acting like the Spanish oppressors they fought to remove (doc 2). Although some considered the foreign subjects less civilized, they still considered moves like the Platt Amendment (which subordinated Cuba to the US for a time) as unfair. Progressive thinkers and reformers, like Jane Addams, also feared what might result at home (doc 4). The spirit of war had so filled America through the hyped yellow journalism and government propaganda, that crime was on the rise. The militaristic, despotic policies that were instituted in the colonies could have crept their way into domestic American law. In a time when the workers were being oppressed by the Captains of Industry, it seemed likely that if this coupled with a militaristic attitude that American democracy would be lost. The US had so stretched itself that a uniform policy of oppression could have taken hold (doc 7). Reformers, educators and writers with progressive mindsets called out to an America wrapped up in nationalistic pride and glory to beware the dangers of an
Stephanson uses Josiah Strong, who is instrumental to the thought of American religious imperialism. Stephanson states, Strong’s ideas were central to the want to conquer particular social ills. In order to do so, Strong utilizes “three important strands of late-nineteenth-century U.S. Protestantism: ‘liberal’ theology; mission at home and abroad; and the social gospel ”. Liberal theology was a reinvention of natural theology in order to fuse God and history into a progressive evolution of the fittest individuals. Missionary activity was key to American church life, these organizations reached their peak toward the end of the century because of the following: the necessity to maintain a firm position while being against the changes of corruption, filth and aliens at home.
They felt empowered by the thought of expanding American westernization and democracy to other countries. Americans, almost as a whole, supported the annexation of the Philippines. However, others still disagreed. Subsequently, Norton and Beveridge had key roles in American’s view after the Spanish-American War.
There were many acts and laws that angered the people. When a lot of these laws and acts came out, the people reacted with violence. They reminded them of the British government, with unfair laws. Two of the acts were the Alien and Sedition Acts. The Alien Acts say that the President of the Untied Sates can declare that people who are from other countries that we are at war with can be jailed or kicked out of the country.
It is against the Declaration of Independence to inflict the democratic government on a group of people who do not have the wish to be governed, therefore denying the basic human right of liberty (Document 2).Sumner was a strong believer in Social Darwinism, which accredits his issues with helping the people of the Philippines adopt a democratic government. Mark Twain, great American author- thought that the United States should be given consent to govern by the governed, rather than placing unfamiliar customs on the Filipino people. There was also concern as to the spread of foreign expansion. The Philippines are geographically located a great distance away than any other territory acquired by the United States (Document 7). The location of the Philippines worried some because it had the potential to make the United States involved in affairs in the eastern hemisphere.
Imperialism allows countries to extend their power through a policy and influence through diplomacy or military force. The late nineteenth century was known as the “Age of Imperialism” a time when the United States rapidly expanded, defending many countries with not enough power to defend for themselves. United States was on a specific world mission to spread liberty and democracy. Along the way America came across China and it’s valuable resources, U.S. could trade for. Imperialism is a positive policy for the U.S.A. because it enlarges trade, helps weaker countries allowing them to spread culture, and expands industry.
1. When did the “Aroostook War” occur & what was its cause? An explosive controversy of the early 1840s involved the Maine boundary dispute. The St. Lawrence River is icebound several months of the year, as the British, remembering the War of 1812, well knew.
Republican? Democrat? During the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, it didn’t matter what political platform you were on, all that mattered was the U.S. expansion to new territories and whether or not the U.S. should have stayed within its boundaries. After the U.S. won the Spanish-American War, attention was placed on new countries, such as the Philippines, and the benefits, or downfalls, of American Imperialism. Imperialism is the policy of extending a country’s power and influence through diplomacy or military force.
Gail Bederman from the university of Notre Dame claims that Theodore Roosevelt, who was the greatest supporter of the attack on Spain and Philippines, had it engineered by both race and gender. These two concepts made him perceive imperialism as being the next stage of growth in a healthy republic. To him, expansion and domination were necessary if America was to civilize the world. For people like Theodore Roosevelt, as the United States advanced, the democratic vision was also progressing (Bederman, 1996). Theodore Roosevelt, just elected to office in 1882, felt that he was very important and had many ambitions.
Imperialism In American Policy After reading these sections in Voices of Freedom the sense of conquering came to me. Seeming as if the United States was in a state of becoming the strongest and securest country at the time. The United States economy needed foreign markets to other words keep alive and progress as a country. Seemed like the federal government was under pressure to secure its power. Also be a prestige country in the world.
At the start of the 19th century, America was already expanding its territory. In 1803, the United States of America had bought the Louisiana Territory, it was bought from France which had made the country two times larger. In 1819 Spain had given up their territory of Florida to the United States. President Monroe issued the “Monroe Doctrine” in 1823, its main purpose was to warn the European countries to not enter the Western Hemisphere. In order for America to achieve its goal of becoming an imperialist nation they had conquered other countries economically, culturally, and with a strong military in the late 1800’s.
However when it came to America’s decision to annex the Philippines, the despotism that came with it appeared to not be an issue to them at first, but anti-imperialists strongly gave their statements as to why it was a bad idea. For a first example, in October of 1899, the American Anti-Imperialist League created a platform, which was a series of beliefs that the entire party supported. The platform advised against the United State’s dictatorial presence in the Philippines, stating “We earnestly condemn the policy of the present national administration in the Philippines. It seeks to extinguish the spirit of 1776… We protest against the extension of American sovereignty by Spanish methods…We hold with Abraham Lincoln, that “no man is good enough to govern another man without that other’s consent” (Document A).
Supporters of imperialism believed in making America a global power; that American control would be beneficial to the world. This conceited idea stems from the very principle nativists built their entire ideology upon, the superiority of the United States. To imperialists and nativists the “most fit” race was was the white American. Nativists believed that American born people, excluding people of color, should receive priority over immigrants. Along with this came many pieces of nativist propaganda implying that other races were to incompetent to participate in civilized democracy.
In this time period industrialism was very prevalent. The first Industrial Revolution consisted of worker abuse, outbreak of diseases, and gender exploitation. Throughout this period there were many reforms and changes made in order to ease people’s comcerns and issues. Afer the reforms were made, there was a period known as the Second Industrial Revolution. Throughout this time, Germany was also progressing at a great speed , and Henry Bessemer figured out how to mass produce steel using super heated air to melt iron’s imperfections.
In being an anti-imperialist the worrisome is not that one opposes the idea of expansion of religion, commercial, and constitutional. It’s that with the annexing of these tropical islands would come to a result of the American system of self government would be that America might abandon this idea that makes America that nation it is to this point. Three reasons why the U.S should avoid imperialism is because it fails to follow that criteria of the constitution, could lead to tyrants like behavior, and could lead to conflict One argument that can’t be missed is the fact that the constitutions sets forth a principle that states “consent of the governed” after further research this means that to imperialize and annex other islands would violate
Imperialism is the act of creating an empire, through extending a country’s power by force, often military, or forming international relations. In many cases the imperializer country reaps financial benefits and extracts resources and raw materials from the country that is colonized, leaving the natives with little to no resources or the ability to advance and develop. When, one country enters another and takes over, it silences the people living there, forcing their voices and their opinions, on how their country should be governed, to be silenced. In many cases this lack of listening to the people’s needs, by the colonizing country’s leaders, has disastrous results: destroyed economies, lives lost, and broken alliances, like the relationship between the British and the Chinese from early 1700s until around 1912.