In history, it is evident that Imperialism has direct implications of industrial advancement; however, when discussing the topic of moral stature, it is clear that imperialism is a damaging force. Document 1, document 2, and document 7 all discuss the industrial aspect of imperialism. Document 1, written by Parker T. Moore, a white man, talks about exporters and manufacturers. Moore states that colonial markets require political control and imperialism to thrive. The British come in and set up their markets, pushing the natives away. This is a way of industrial advancement, but certainly not moral. Document 2 discusses how tropical—and uncivilized—nations and modern nations have a mutualistic and symbiotic relationship. The foreigners come …show more content…
Document 7, written by Romesh Dutt, and Indian, explains how the Englishmen had brought them the greatest gift: peace. The westerners brought education, science, and social systems. This passage was written by someone who was being conquered, so he has a unique perspective. His optimistic outlook on the industrial advancement is prominent in the passage. All the rest of the documents discusses the moral implications of industrialism. For example, document 3 is a political document depicting a general being pulled by natives. The general represents the industrialists with their military power, while the natives are forced to pull him. The natives do all the work while the general sits back and relaxes. Document 4 is a poem written from the perspective of an African. In the poem, the White Man kill a boy’s father, seduce his mother, and work his brother to death, with the audacity at the end to command the boy to get the White Man a drink. This poem perfectly shows the outlook of some of the natives. The White Man, imperialists, barge into a county and take advantage of the natives. There is no moral advancement here; in fact, there is moral degradation in …show more content…
This is absolute moral destruction on the side of the natives. Imperialists make them feel inadequate and irresponsible, which is no way to be forced to live. Document 6, written by an egocentric Briton. Cecil Rhodes blatantly states that “[Britons] are the finest race in the world, and the more of the world we inhabit, the better it is for the human race…more Angle Saxon race, more of the best, the most human, most honourable race the world possesses” (Rhodes). If this is not the most egocentric, racist statement, then imperialism has positive moral outcomes. This statement shows how imperialism causes not only moral harm to the oppressed, but to the oppressor as well. Rhodes has an ego larger than the territory Britain conquered. Document 8 is a picture. The picture shows a slave being flattened in a machine, with money coming out, and a white man pouring a small amount of water in his mouth. There is also a priest or religious figure in the corner. This is a metaphor to the imperialistic attitude. The Westerners come in and abuse the natives for the sole purpose of monetary value, completely supported by the religious
Not to mention the damage the European agriculture and construction have done to the native species. One might receive the same message when looking at R. C. Bowman’s political cartoon titled, “Joseph Chamberlain mounts a new gun.” This image depicts the English leader of foreign policy, Joseph Chamberlain, firing different guns labeled, “extermination,” “conciliation,” and “intimidation” from a cannon labeled “parliamentary majority.” Bowman created this image to convey the message that imperialism cannot be justified by the claim that it seeks to civilize underdeveloped people, because, in their efforts to “civilize” them, the English invaders are doing nothing but killing countless native people. Not only are they killing natives, this image suggests that anyone in the battle for “civilization” is at risk of being killed, this includes the
Indeed, from their first arrival in the New World, the European explorers treated the native people, and the slaves that they brought, as barbarous heathens, incapable of higher thought or civilized behavior. For example, Christopher Columbus’s letter to the King of Spain from his first voyage intricately shows these original encounters. In this letter, he carefully describes the people of the island, pointing out that they “all go naked, men and women, as their mothers bore them” and that they “are very marvelously timorous.” He then adds that he “gave them a thousand handsome good things, which [he] had brought, in order that they might conceive affection for us and, more than that, might become Christians and be inclined to the love and service of Your Highness.” Though he is not describing forced religious conversion, he is undoubtedly showing how the Europeans treated people with religions that were different from their own.
Perspectives To imperialize is to take control of a culture or a group of colonies and teach them the value of another culture. Historically, Imperialism began in Europe because of Social Darwinism, the desire for humanity to make the best possible traits. Therefore, Europe began the idea that it was their duty to influence other colonies and help civilize them. However, imperialist took control of the power they gained and it later became a controversial topic. Imperialist gained power and control economically, politically and socially over the colonies while the colonized people lost cultural values and wealth.
Throughout the turn of the 19th Century a big question was raised among the American people and their leaders, was America going to become an Imperialist state or not? The question was not really raised previously during the 1800’s. The people of America were previously occupied colonizing its own land and settling towns throughout the area. However, once they reached the end of their exploration, which ended at the Pacific Ocean, where would they go? Should they start to colonize other islands around the world, or shall they be content in their own little world?
After the Civil War, the United States had begun to prosper because of this second industrial revolution. With this property, the people had begun to expand across the whole of the United States causing the frontier line within the US to disappear, which lead to the rise of the idea of imperialism and stronger foreign policy. Because of the rise of yellow journalism, the closing of the frontier line, the expansion of the United States Navy, and the rise of colonization of foreign European powers within Asia, debates and conflicting views had begun to arise on the idea of imperialism and whether or not it is a good idea to expand overseas and become a world power. Advocates for the expansion of the United States argued that it was the duty of
In the late nineteenth and century, many Americans agree with the view of imperialism, but in the early twentieth century America disagreed with the overseas expansion because they believed it went against the whole U.S. believe in freedom and self-rule. Many Americans believed it was the U.S. burden to teach undeveloped countries into civilization; therefore, the U.S. helped Cuba and the Philippines after the and during Spanish-American War. As Time progressed, Americans did not want to get involved in any other war. As a result, the U.S.passed the Espionage Act of 1917 to avoid entering future warfare.
During the time of exploration of North America, questions arose of the Native people that inhabited the land, if they were or not capable of learning European cultural values, government, and converting to the faith of Christianity, and if not they should be enslaved to the Europeans. The primary document of “In Defense of the Indians” focuses on the argument between Bartolomé de Las Casas, an advocate for Native Rights, and Juan Gines de Sepulveda, a Spanish humanist, with opposing opinions on the enslavement and conversion of the Amerindians. The document focuses primary on Las Casas response and argument towards Sepulveda, Las Casas opposed his position and fought for his beliefs that the Natives deserved rights, protection, and were civilized beings. Las Casas often refers to Aristotle’s notions, as he believes that the Native people are capable of learning, are willing and able to convert to Christianity and should not be enslaved. Sepulveda argues that the Native people are “barbaric”, are lesser beings than the Europeans and should be enslaved for these very reasons.
How i feel about about imperialism you say .? The earliest 19 century was known as the “Age of Imperialism” Americans was refers to economic meaning business . Military and cultural influence of the united states worldwide. Native americans have a good relationship with the United States because they may be members of nations, tribes, or bands also treaty rights . The imperialism state took away from it belief in time found itself involved .
With open sea's and whirling winds, one could taste adventure in the air, or rather the profits. A land of gold and prosperity were promised to those brave few who dare travel into the newly discovered world. Many answered the call of promised riches leaping into this untraveled land. However they know not the disease and blood that lie ahead when no claim to this land be give to the native population. Imperialism has lead to the destruction of culture and people, torn down empires and human decency is thrown to the wind.
The first source is a quotation delineated by Joseph Chamberlain 's, who is a British Colonial Officer, eurocentric perspective. He clearly views the British culture as prevalent (or further developed) than different cultures, for example, the indigenous culture. That is the reason he alludes to the colonial enterprise as "carrying out the work of civilization.." This source can directly be associated with the demonstration of eurocentrism. Eurocentrism is the worldview that European culture, beliefs and values, were the "correct, proper or rightful” way.
In being an anti-imperialist the worrisome is not that one opposes the idea of expansion of religion, commercial, and constitutional. It’s that with the annexing of these tropical islands would come to a result of the American system of self government would be that America might abandon this idea that makes America that nation it is to this point. Three reasons why the U.S should avoid imperialism is because it fails to follow that criteria of the constitution, could lead to tyrants like behavior, and could lead to conflict One argument that can’t be missed is the fact that the constitutions sets forth a principle that states “consent of the governed” after further research this means that to imperialize and annex other islands would violate
Mikaal Khalifa Ms. Sobiera NBE3U1-02 30 January 2023 How Indigenous People Have Been Oppressed and it Negatively Affected Them Picture This. People come into your house forcefully, take your thing, eat the food in your house, and then section off part of your house where you have to stay. This is what happened to Indigenous people when the Europeans came to their land. In the text “The Inconvenient Indian” by Thomas King, Thomas King talks about how Indigenous people have been oppressed throughout time by the Europeans or Colonizers. These events show how being oppressed can lead to a worsening quality of life for the Indigenous people.
Imperialism has caused an immense amount of difficulties for people either individually or with their families. The age of imperialism started around the late 1700’s with European industrialization. This movement engaged the movement of colonization and annexing different parts of the world. In “Back to My Own Country: An Essay” and “Shooting an Elephant '' demontrates the different movements of discrimination, exploiting, and mistreatments in people’s own homes. British colonialism discriminated and
This colonial norm is an essential factor that critically influences colonized populations because it opposes any prospects of autonomy and self-rule. This perception of what Great Britain’s role ought to be, as a regulating force with control over the economy and
Chapter 1 A discursive on minority studies would suggest that power in the form of knowledge was what created hegemony. So also when we look at the colonial discourse, we have come to an understanding or rather it is understood that one of the pertaining factor that sustained the domination over the colonies was ‘power’ in the form of knowledge. That very knowledge further gave the colonizers the power to ‘represent’ the colonized. Edward Said says, Orientalism is the colonizers way of, “dealing with the Orient by making statements about it, authorizing views of it, describing it, teaching it, ruling over it,” or rather, “Orientalism as a Western style for dominating, restructuring and having authority over the Orient.”