In Cold Blood Essay
The actions of Perry Edward Smith and Richard Eugene “Dick” Hickock on November 15, 1959, will forever be remembered and gives the state all reason to why they deserve the death penalty. Herb Clutter, Bonnie Clutter, the father and mother, Nancy Clutter, Kenyon Clutter, the children of Mrs. and Mr. Clutter were the four citizens that tragically lost their lives. Smith and Hickock deserve the death penalty for the crime they committed.
The Clutter home is located in Holcomb, Kansas. In that home, four innocent lives were taken by Smith and Hickock, who had no business being in the home in the first place and had left with only $40-50. Al Dewey had said, "The suffering. The horror. They were dead. A whole family. Gentle,
…show more content…
Any one person, or in this case two people, that kill another human being should deserve the death penalty. Duntz said, “‘You were killing the Clutter family.’ Smith swallowed. He began to rub his knees. You were out in Holcomb, Kansas. In the home of Mr. Herbert W. Clutter. And before you left that house you killed all the people in it." (Capote, 144) Being murdered is one of the most harsh ways you can pass. Bonnie said, “To be murdered. To be murdered. No. No. There's nothing worse. Nothing worse than that. Nothing," (Bonnie, 96) Both men should be counted as equally guilty no matter who did the killing. Both Smith and Hickock were at the scene of the crime and the reason it took place. "Can there be a single doubt in your minds regarding the guilt of these defendants? No! Regardless of who pulled the trigger on Richard Eugene Hickock's shotgun, both men are equally guilty," (The Corner, 192). Regardless of which exact man who did it both were equally in the wrong for the actions they committed. Perry Smith and Richard Hickock do in fact deserve the worst punishment, the death penalty. Both men were at the scene of the deaths, both men deserve the
1. The comparison between grain elevators to Greek temples is how the Greek temples are like the elevators but way before tourists reach them. Capote uses imagery to get his point across that the land in Holcomb is extraordinary. 2. To emphasize that they didn't really know who their neighbors were.
Capote, with the intention of breaking the stereotype that murderers have no moral compass, describes the two murderers, Perry and Dick, differently. Capote includes that Wendle, one of the first people at the Clutter house after the murder, said that Perry and Dick would “cut out your heart and never bat an eye” (254). Capote illustrates that Wendle’s claim is not credible since Wendle drew his conclusion against Perry and Dick solely based on one source of evidence--the crime scene. Moreover, Capote utilizes Wendle’s opinion as a vehicle to establish that many, because Perry and Dick committed murder, immediately assumed that Perry and Dick do not value life, a typical stereotype of murderers. In defense of his virtue, Perry recalls “as we’re
After most people hear what Perry has gone through you immediately give him a get out of jail free card right? You think that since he had a difficult upbringing he should be exempt from receiving the death penalty? Although you may think this, this is certainly not an excuse for such a violent act. Throughout In Cold Blood, Capote attempts to portray to the reader that Smith in a way should be exempt from the crime he commited and how one should not blame it on Smith himself, but his psychological background. Specifically when Al Dewey, the head of the Clutter murder investigation, states how the crime was not in fact Smiths fault.
Five years after the brutal executions of the Clutters, the callous perpetrators, Perry Edward Smith and Richard Eugene Hitchcock were executed for their heinous crime. Due to their many appeals, Hitchcock and Smith managed to prolong their demise by several years. Hitchcock filed all those appeals on the grounds of a biased trial, jury, and judge. However, each appeal lead to the conclusion that the trail was unbiased and lead to the same sentencing. On April 14, 1965, Both Perpetrators were executed by hanging.
The book In Cold Blood highlights many societal and personal issues which in all honesty have never crossed my mind. Regardless, not one of these resonated with me more than the death penalty, which in my mind was without a doubt Capote’s intent. In specific the death penalty existing for individuals proven to be mentally insane or deemed mentally unfit, in other words they truly did not know any better. Capote indirectly argues the death penalty throughout the entire novel. An example of this is when Capote talks about the family members of the Clutters not wishing for the death penalty on the duo as even they believed it was too harsh a punishment.
In the novel, In Cold Blood, Truman Capote chose his words in a subjective manner. Capote inaccurately described many characters in his novel. He based his writing on his feelings and emotions rather than facts and evidence. Capote characterized Richard Hickock, Perry Smith, and Bonnie Clutter falsely. Capote described Richard Hickock as a bloodthirsty, violent person yet he did not actually kill any of the Clutters.
It is widely accepted, both in the legislature and in family values, that killing other humans is wrong, but what about the innocent man that was forced to kill a someone while being
Why take someone’s life for money or even worse than that why would you take a whole family’s life? It’s not right to kill someone for no reason, in fact it’s not right to kill anyone. Anyone who killed someone should get the death penalty because they deserve it. They just took someone’s life for no reason at all. So Perry and Dick should get the death penalty for killing an entire family for no reason at all.
Each a part of Canada 's most notorious serial killers; all whom have multiple counts of rape, murder, kidnap and torture. Although they have all committed horrendous crimes, does that mean we can sentence them to a death penalty? If taking someone else 's life is immoral, why should we choose to to take another person 's life in return for
Because of the arguments hinted at by Truman Capote in In Cold Blood, there will always be debate on whether capital punishment should be used for certain crimes. One can never be sure if a punishment, whether as mild as jail time or as severe as the death penalty, is justified for the crime
Now, there is no direct quote from Capote discussing his view on this issue, but it can be reasonably inferred by the quote’s presence in the novel that he would argue each citizen to think about how and why the death sentence is actually used. Capote himself would most likely not agree with this stance, but it seems to be the way it is. The innocent men and women of the town were baffled and torn by the scene of the gruesome murder, and they needed a relief, which in this case, was the death of Perry and Dick. Clearly, the death penalty can be used as a way to comfort the people in a time of distress.
Mark Smith the author of “The Road to Winter” displays that affliction brings out the very finest and least in people. The story is centred the main character Finn. He survived a deadly virus that wiped out his entire town and he has to adapt to a life by himself. Finn lost his family and friends and had to survive on his own. He learnt to kill animals, defend himself and a whole lot more.
Dick from In Cold Blood maintained that he was less guilty and did not deserve the death penalty. In stating this, Dick was not correct that he was less guilty. There are justifiable proofs that diminish his chances of being less guilty. These proofs are found within the book and can be represented through his demeanors and actions prior to and after the night. Richard Eugene Hickock (Dick) in In Cold Blood is just as guilty as Perry in that he had clearly displayed his intent for killing the Clutter family.
In the story “In Cold Blood” Truman Capote uses a tone of “somber” by expressing how death causes the reflection of life. Capote uses the word "life", something that we all know is a grave matter that we wouldn't want to lose. The confrontation towards the man’s feelings of the passing of the Clutter family makes him feel melancholy. He says “it was a melancholy task” knowing that Kenyon was no longer there to help.
Also, if society does not sentence an offender to death, they are an accomplice to that crime (Avaliani, 2004). Criminals that kill should suffer the same fate as their victims. The punishment should,