The Search for Refuge: Is it the Same for All Individuals? For every individual, the correlation between oneself and where their refuge is found varies. Principally, the concept of refuge solicits questions such as “refuge from what?”, “refuge from who?”, “refuge found where?”, “refuge found with whom?”, “why refuge?” and so on.. Refuge can be found in the rush of climbing the Devil’s Thumb, feeling the harsh breeze and the consciousness of the nature surrounding oneself, train hopping freight trains moving faster than cars on freeways, etc. Mainly, refuge should facilitate one’s diverse struggles. However, finding refuge may require danger, safety, or another alternative that provides comfort and clearness of mind to oneself. People may have …show more content…
We see this in Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer, when Chris McCandless leaves behind his relationship with his parents, his peers, his sister, his education, alongside abandoning many possessions that were once important to him on his dangerous journey to find refuge in the Alaskan Wilderness. His reasoning for having hitchhiked across a good deal of miles on his own being that he wanted to elude himself from the societal norms of needing safety and security when it comes to what lies ahead oneself, along with present occupations. McCandless’ desire for constant escapism was found through the adventurous, but precarious, dangers of nature. Figuratively, in the unforeseen conduct of one living in the wilderness rather than the likely path followed by those living the “nine to five life”. The riskiness in question of going into the wilderness alone involves hypothermia, starvation, injury, depression, and many more negative effects. Nonetheless, McCandless was able to find refuge in this foresighting. In page 182 of Into The Wild, the author, Jon Krakauer well describes why …show more content…
The experience of relentless action itself is where one could conceivably find refuge, as even when the destination is reached, no further refuge is found. Simultaneously, while the author of Into The Wild, Jon Krakauer, depicted his experience as an adventurous youth, he also mentioned his perspective of actuality concerning the journey’s real association with refuge when he emphasizes how “It is easy, when you are young, to believe that what you desire is no less than what you deserve, to assume that if you want something badly enough, it is your God-given right to have it. When I decided to go to Alaska that April, like Chris McCandless, I was a raw youth who mistook passion for insight and acted according to an obscure, gap-ridden logic. I thought climbing the Devil's Thumb would fix all that was wrong with my life. In the end, of course, it changed almost nothing. But I came to appreciate that mountains make poor receptacles for dreams.” (pg. 182). Similar to Krakauer, McCandless was always reaching for the goal, unknowingly having already found his refuge in the thrill of the journey. Although McCandless' first intentions were to explore the Alaskan wilderness in total isolation and to find the refuge he sought after in such circumstances, McCandless unknowingly established refuge in the course of his travels. It most likely did not cross McCandless’ mind,
Almost everyone can identify with the desire to travel entirely alone into the woods, away from the poisonous routine and materialism of daily life, and into an environment where your passion determines life or death. This was the reality for Christopher McCandless and Jon Krakauer.
Did McCandless find what he wanted to seek in the wilderness before he died? Krakauer recognizes his own particular fixation in the presentation, and his creating of the story brings up its
In Into the Wild, Chris McCandless serves as an example of what rediscovering the frontier can give us as he undertakes both a symbolic and physical frontier. He is proof of the adventurous spirit buried deep within every American, that draws them into the frontier, and into the wild. Taking the first step into the unknown is the most taxing step of the journey, which is why Jon Krakauer frequently returns to the end of Chris’s college experience, which is when he begins the first steps toward the frontier. Chris sees hope in an endlessly changing life. He sees adventure and new experiences where others might see danger and peril.
The Alaskan Wilderness: cold, lonely and, for some people, their final resting place. John Krakauer’s book “Into the Wild” describes the story of Chris McCandless, who was a normal American man on the verge of entering adulthood with a college degree, over $20,000 in savings, and a beloved Datsun car who met his fate in Alaska. One day, he dropped everything to live alone, and eventually die alone, in the middle of nowhere, Alaska. Chris McCandless believed that conformity was too restrictive. He trusted that anyone could find true happiness and passion by leaving everything behind and starting a new lifestyle, which would allow for him to become free and independent.
Have you ever wondered what it is like to live in the wild, and become a whole new person, or what it is like to live in the wild to find yourself? Well if you have then I recommend that you read the book titled ¨Into the wild¨ written by Jon Krakauer. In this book there is a man named Chris McCandless who left society and went into the wilderness of Alaska and cut off all contact with the outside world. He wanted to find himself, and become a better person. Some may believe that Chris went into the wild to escape a toxic relationship with his parents, but the real reason he left everything was he wanted to find himself, and he felt as if he could function without everyday things.
To conclude, Krakauer uses three valuable techniques to capture the meaning behind Into the Wild and McCandless’s journey itself: narrative structure, epigraphs, and tone. Chris McCandless was an intelligent young man who sought adventure far from his dull stable life. He essentially went off the grid to capture what he wished for the most, which was ultimate freedom and happiness. It was like a tag on a shirt that keeps bothering the tenderness of one’s skin. It was the reason why the tag was ripped off.
Hunter Roll Professor Swan ENGL 153 27 February 2023 Connection Narrative In Jon Krakauer’s Into the Wild, the main character Christopher McCandless is viewed by most as being a young man who wishes to break free from the chains and rules of society by escaping to the great and wonderfully vast outdoors. The protagonist felt that his best option was to leave our man-made world behind and head out into the wilderness with nothing but a couple of books, some rice, and a small rifle. Some may see his actions and desires as brave and romantic. However, this essay will argue the opposite and provide some personal experiences along the way.
This means that the mountains are about to give him the desire he is searching for by setting out into the Alaskan wilderness and temporarily separating him from society, an opportunity he took during the course of his life. All three of these men McCandless, Thoreau, and Krakauer shared this value in life, making this a suitable epigraph to include in this work of nonfiction, especially in this chapter for it ties many perspectives of the recurrent free-spirited
In the nonfiction novel Into The Wild by Jon Krakauer, the story of Chris McCandless and compares it to the stories of Chris McCandless, Everett Ruess, John Waterman, Carl McCunn, and his own, in the wilderness. All of their stories, with Krakauer the exception, end with death. This novel produces two themes: Nature holds the eye of man as a beauty that contains wonders and dangers, and people should go out and explore despite the risks. The other theme, however, both contradicts
Throughout the novel we are introduced to many travelers who share the same longing for adventure and freedom from the normalities society placed upon them, as McCandless. In the last letter received from Everett Ruess, another traveler who met the same fate as McCandless, he talks about his fascination with the wilderness and how he doesn;t see himself ever separating from it. The letter states, “I have been thinking more and more that I shall always be a lone wanderer of the wilderness. God, how the trail lures me. You cannot comprehend its resistless fascination for me.
Krakauer shows evidence of this in chapters 14 and 15 of Into The Wild when he uses these chapters to compare and contrast himself from Chris McCandless. The biographer touches heavily on their common ground, including unfortunate family history. Indeed, throughout later chapters of the book, Krakauer allows his audience a glimpse of what he believes to be true of McCandless and his unfortunate demise, particularly when he states, “When the adventure did indeed prove fatal, this melodramatic declaration fueled considerable speculation that the boy had been bent on suicide from the beginning, that when he walked into the bush, he had no intention of ever walking out again. I’m not so sure, however”(Krakauer 134). Consequently, this writing style is far from unbiased and continues to prove the idea that biographers cannot maintain
McCandless is, finally, just a pale 20th-century burlesque of London’s protagonist, who freezes because he ignores advice and commits big time hubris) .... His ignorance, which could have been cured by a USGS quadrant and a Boy Scout manual, is what killed him.” (Krakauer, 51). This added quote supports the claim that because of the underlying theme of McCandless’s arrogance it caused him to go into the Alaskan wilderness ill-equipped and unprepared which eventually led to his untimely
From younger age, we have been taught to behave in a certain way in order to fit in. When we grow up, our lives get automatically filled with growing amounts of responsibilities and expectations that we need to fulfill. It is a tough world to live in; its pressure and rules can lead so many people to run away from it seeking a peace of their mind. But where should we run to? The wilderness, as being the only alternative to the human world, seems to be an ideal place to take a vacation from all of the distractions of modernity, where all human problems seem to fade and become meaningless.
According to John Krakauer in Into the Wild, he shows how McCandless and others have a unique perception of the wilderness because they have this awareness of free belonging to the wild. Their perspective has them in a reassurance of capturing their life in the wilderness, thinking about how it will change their whole perspective from daily struggles. In agreement with Leo Tolstoy in Into the Wild, “I wanted movement and not a calm course of existence. I wanted excitement and danger and the chance to sacrifice myself for my love. I felt in myself a superabundance of energy which found no outlet in our quiet life” (15).
The Alaskan Bush is one of the hardest places to survive without any assistance, supplies, skills, and little food. Jon Krakauer explains in his biography, Into The Wild, how Christopher McCandless ventured into the Alaskan Bush and ultimately perished due to lack of preparation and hubris. McCandless was an intelligent young man who made a few mistakes but overall Krakauer believed that McCandless was not an ignorant adrenalin junkie who had no respect for the land. Krakauer chose to write this biography because he too had the strong desire to discover and explore as he also ventured into the Alaskan Bush when he was a young man, but he survived unlike McCandless. Krakauer’s argument was convincing because he gives credible evidence that McCandless was not foolish like many critics say he was.