When faced with difficult situations, Presidents throughout history have made questionable decisions over what is best for the American people. Whether faced with foreign or internal threats, the pressures of the executive office can lead to controversial choices. Actions that are initially viewed as necessary and justifiable, even applauded for their purpose, can become — in hindsight — unfair, unwise, and even unconstitutional. Often times, these lapses in proper judgement of what is lawful and necessary arise from trying times of high emotion, when the President believes that they are operating for the safety and preservation of the American people at the time of the conflict. Two such Presidents, elected during times of intense adversity …show more content…
President John Adams and the Alien and Sedition Acts
President John Adams was elected in 1797, as the second President of the United States. His inauguration came at a time of transition in American society, as the new nation was still adjusting to its independence. Political parties divided the nation, and citizens divided the parties. Federalists split between Conservatives and Moderates, as everyone had their own ideas on the limits of freedom. The Adams Administration represented this division as it was a mixed administration — Adams was a Federalist but his vice-president, Thomas Jefferson, was a Democratic-Republican with very different ideas about how government should be run. Additionally, Americans had varying ideas about the French Revolution, creating conflict in Europe. In addition to American power shifts, there was a huge growth of newspapers throughout the decade. Publishers sold issues because of their “intense commitment to a particular partisan view of the contentious events of the day” — most people at the time believed that their political opponents would “destroy the nation” if they
The Alien and Sedition Acts were passed in 1798 in preparation for an anticipated war with France. It interpreted the participation of immigrants in the Republican opposition party for evidence between foreigners and disloyalty. As an immigrant I really don’t think it should be so harsh on us foreigners trying to help our government. Since immigrants were trying to get in the republican party, Federalists made harder and tighter restrictions for us immigrants and all the critics also. The Naturalization Act was also passed in 1798 which increased residency on requirement of American citizens.
Moe and Howell offer compelling reasons as to why unilateral action is even a concern. They point to the combination of constitutional ambiguity in the level to which presidents are able to act. The multitude of statues, clauses, and loopholes give the executive room to take action in a number
This lead to what was called a “political paranoia”. This paranoia created a hiatus with Americans so it caused to stop anything that seemed or was French. Federalists found this to be threatening because it brought up a concern about the struggle between the rulers and
The 1800 presidential election between Thomas Jefferson and incumbent John Adams led Americans to make a decision between a Democratic-Republican candidate and a Federalist candidate. When making this choice it is important to examine the events of the time period, ideals of the candidates, and the states of the political parties. In this election one of the most important events of this era was the Alien and Sedition Acts passed by John Adams. Both parties possessed differing beliefs, with Federalists favoring a strong central government and the Democratic-Republicans favoring power to the states. Additionally, events during the Adams’ presidency had led to division within the Federalist Party.
On July 14, 1798, the federal government passed the Alien and Sedition Acts. Thomas Jefferson and John Adams are presenting their opinions on behalf of the Legislature on why the think these acts are good and bad. Thomas Jefferson believes these acts go against the Constitution while John Adams believes that they are justified in the Constitution. People may disagree with Thomas Jefferson and say that aliens have temporary rights that can be taken away. While others believe if the specific alien isn’t violating others peoples rights or being dangerous to others, they shouldn’t be thrown out.
The role of the president is an increasingly contentious subject matter, and is especially relevant in the late 20th and early 21st centuries due to an increase in partisan gridlock. The question surrounding how much power the President should be able to have has been a discussion in government dating back to the framers of the constitution. The framers purposefully did not want the President to have too much power due to their opposition to an all-powerful central government. The checks and balance provision between the Legislative, Judicial and Executive branch was implemented to ensure that no branch of government could obtain a disproportionate amount of power. The broad nature of the second article surrounding executive power has been used as a tool for presidents to
The United States walked once on unsteady grounds, leading to chaos and fear of the unknown. In the 1700’s the war between France and England initiated conflicts within The United States. Political parties from the same nation sided with different countries, which divided our nation and led to bigotries within legislations and government administration. The insecurity of the two political parties led to The Alien and Sedition Acts. The Alien and Sedition Acts became a polemic topic that leads to numerous
But it was strongly attacked by Republican parties, James Madison had said that the act was the “right of freely examining public characters and measures, and of free communication among the people." In 1800, the enforcement of the Alien and Sedition Acts ended after Thomas Jefferson's election as president. However, the restriction were resurrected in later
Washington, I would like to agree with you that the “ineffective” Alien and Sedition Acts are threatening the security of our government by causing useless domestic squabbling. Our focus needs to be moved from our own inner conflict to preventing war with France; we need to work on making peace with Europe if we want our country to have a future and not to be destroyed in unnecessary conflict. Mr. Adams argued that Jeffersonian ideals prevent national unity by directly repudiating the Federalist government’s beliefs. Contrary to his belief, I think that he is the one preventing peace and unity between the two parties. How could one expect for there to be peace when he just passed laws that attempted to weaken the Democratic-Republican party?
In 2017, history repeated itself as millions of people in America and around the world stood on the streets to protest President Donald Trump’s executive order to prevent immigration and people from entering into the United States of America. Trump’s order mirrored the Alien and Sedition Acts created in 1798 to hurt French immigrants and Democratic-Republicans. Similar to Trump's executive order, the controversial Alien and Sedition Acts disregarded the United States founding principles of democracy, rights, liberty, opportunity, and equality. The Alien and Sedition Acts violated the founding principles of the United States because they violated individual protections under the first amendment and they allowed the president to overstep his
The Alien and Sedition Acts were laws that President John Adams and the congress passed on 1798. These laws intended to stop Democratic-Republicans from gaining power. The first act, the Naturalization Law, mandated that any resident, in order to become a citizen of the United States of America, would have to live in the country for fourteen years instead of five. Another, The Enemy Aliens law, gave Adams the power to expel and imprison any enemy of the United States. The Sedition law claimed that it was illegal to talk negatively or criticize the government.
Other presidents such as Abraham Lincoln and Woodrow Wilson, choose to act as “the voice of the people” by understanding themselves to be the heads of their political parties and making executive decisions. It is important to understand that the symbolic importance of a presidency can lead to the transcending of formal constitutional powers. However, what happens when a president seemly transcends his constitutional power, by executive action? When President Lincoln employed a war power when he announced a blockade on Southern ports without the declaration of war (Baker 177), he caused much controversy. Although, the president argued that his symbolic importance as the voice of the people led to his actions, stating that, “as the only nationally elected official in government…he embodied the peoples will” (Baker
“The presidency has become the premier branch of government, even though it is listed second in the constitution,” says Sabato (198). “Presidents made clear that in their view they had full authority to make war whether Congress agreed or not, and that they reserved the right to move forward in the case of a contrary decision by the legislative branch,” thus backing his decision of limiting war-making powers of the President and expanding them to Congress instead (Sabato 199). Sabato notes examples of “police actions” by presidents in the past that includes Johnson’s Vietnam War, Clinton’s entry into Haiti and Bosnia and George W. Bush’s wars in Afghanistan (199). Each example given was a decision based on their judgment with no or very little advice from Congress, and even if they were to consult Congress on such decisions very few would listen. Though the Constitution gives equal war-making powers to both Congress and the president, it’s not always that
A hero is defined as a person who is caring, honorable, and put others’ needs before theirs. John Adams is a great example of a this. John Adams was born on October 20th, 1735 in Massachusetts. He graduated from Harvard University in 1755, where he earned his undergraduate and master's degrees. In 1764, John Adams married Abigail Smith and they had six children.
Leanna Kontos APUSH Per.4 9/30/15 Main Ideas of Unit One: Question #6 The First Continental Congress happened during the period of September 5, 1774 to October 26, 1774. This marked the first time that the all of the colonies, except Georgia, were together. The purpose of this meeting was to address the issues they had with Britain.