John Smith is expressing himself and supporting a figure that is known as an enemy to the United States: this is covered under the first amendment right for freedom of expression, religion, and speech. Mr. Smith is also protected by the Free Exercise Clause which “provides absolute protection for the right to express one’s religious beliefs and to assemble with other believers. It also protects people’s right to solicit funds and proselytize on behalf of religious organizations.” Likewise, John did not make any threats to the U.S Government by expressing his belief and support to Isis. He did not commit libel or slander; he did not use obscenity or fighting words. Additionally, Mr. Smith’s belief for Islamic Caliphate, meaning a rule of a Muslim ruling in the United States, is not indicating to overthrow the U.S government by violence. …show more content…
Smith, we are convicting every individual in the United States. We would be stripping them their natural born liberties given to them by the framers of the Constitution; a paper of laws that hold this countries foundations together. In conclusion, the Patriot Act would destroy every direction of defense for Mr. Smith. With charges being based on the Patriot Act of 2001, Mr. Smith would be charged with sedition for the following reasons, first for communicating and providing financial support to a known enemy of the united states, secondly for dressing publicly as a soldier that is an enemy of the united states ( which can be considered intimidating), and finally for speaking publicly about his desire to have a Islamic caliphate as a governing leader which directly relates to removing the current united states government. All of these acts can be proven with evidence gathered from phone records, financial records, computer record, searches, and information from other foreign countries. All of this evidence can be gathered without Mr. Smith’s consent or initial knowledge as covered by the Patriot
The Task Force Smith’s battalion were undermanned and outgunned from the beginning. The battalion consisted of roughly 400 soldiers and included 134 men from the 52nd Field Artillery Battalion. Task Force Smith’s arsenal included six M9A1 Bazooka rocket launchers, two 4.2 inch mortars, four 60mm mortars and 75mm recoilless rifles. The weaponry of Task Force Smith was obsolete compared to the NKPA however, they maintained the defensible high ground. It is unclear of the exact weaponry the NKPA had however, what is known, the NKPA brought a force of five thousand infantry soldiers and thirty-six T-36 and T-85 tanks.
While John Adams was president he was faced with a problem, American ships were getting taken and the sailors were not safe. Earlier the Americans had a problem where the British would not leave the Ohio River Valley, because of this problem the American’s chief justice was sent to Britain to propose a peace treaty, the Jay treaty. This treaty proved successful and in this treaty Britain pulled their troops from the Ohio Valley. The French considered this to be an act of betrayal and attacked the Americans. To end these attacks, three representatives were sent from America to France.
The 1st amendment “The First Amendment guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition.” (First amendment, 1789) Which means that he has his own freedom of what to talk. Moreover, there was a case in taxes that a man called Gregory L. Johnson burned the USA flag as a way of his protesting. This time, the Supreme Court stated that “In a controversial decision, the Supreme Court, by the closest possible margin of a 5-to-4 vote, held that a person has a right to express disagreement with governmental policies by burning the American flag.”
As the director for the following movies, "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington" and "Mr. Deeds Goes to Town", Frank Capra created and interpreted his own understanding of the American Hero. He describes the hero as an individual that is completely connected to his community and in the same manner the community trusts in him and cares about him as an individual. Also, the messages of these movies firmly resonate with the biblical and American values and principles. The first movie that I watched is "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington" that shows the story of a young politician, Jefferson Smith, who is chosen by the state's Governor, Hubert Hooper to go to Washington to replace a Senator who has just died.
The significance of the Compromise of 1850 lies on the continuation of peace accomplished by the Missouri Compromise of 1820, in spite of sectional contrasts. Opinions from the north and south were opposite, but the Compromise of 1850 made them achieve an interim political harmony. It fulfilled what it planned to accomplish at the time, to revive the Union and peace. Most politicians realized that the compromise was an interwoven and that it was an interim arrangement, best case scenario to delay the unavoidable Civil War.
Bache asked for a trial because he protested that his freedom of speech and press had been violated, but he died of yellow fever before his trial went to court” (Lynch, The Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, pg. 1 2007). Unjustly punishing those who disobeyed the Alien and Sedition further shows the violation of America’s founding principles. Punishing people for just saying what they believe in is unconstitutional and violates America’s founding principal of democracy and rights. It is impossible to have a democracy where citizens are punished for saying their
Richardson alleges they hid evidence of Zains Faked crime lab tests and false trial testimony four years before others uncovered the lie (Messina, Lawrence). This helps back up the information on Richardson’s case.
Was the United States Justified in Going to War With Mexico? Who started the Mexican-American War? Firstly, The United States went to Mexico in 1846. Texas declared its independence from Mexico in 1836. Certainly, Americans were being extremely greedy and wanted more and more land.
The second issue is that the court held the government to failure to reveal its promise to Robert Taliento violated John Giglio due process rights established in Brady v. Maryland to receive all exculpatory evidence from the prosecution before trial. In relation, Napue v. Illinois, the undisclosed information proved that the government violated Giglio’s due process rights by presenting a false testimony from
December 7th, 1941 is a day changed the lives of all Americans. It is the day Japan deliberately attacked the U.S. naval base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii killing many U.S. soldiers and destroying a lot of the U.S. naval fleet. This day which turned the tide of World War II, up until this point the U.S. had not chosen to intervene in the conflict overseas, but Japan’s attack had given the U.S. a reason to enter the fight. This speech given by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on December 8th, 1941 was his own passionate plea to the U.S. government and people to support the U.S. entering the war and fighting back against the tyranny occurring overseas. President Franklin D. Roosevelt effectively appeals to the emotions of the U.S. population by establishing trust with his audience through the use of emotional diction, and repetition which allow him to rally support for the war effort.
Bernard Lewis’, The Roots of Muslim Rage, begins with a quotation from Thomas Jefferson’s theory of the separation of church and state, in which Jefferson argues against government involvement in the establishment of a state religion. According to Jefferson, the principle of civil government should be reversed in matters concerning religion so that the slogan of Americanism is, “Divided we stand, united, we fall.” In other words, the formation and continued progression of America’s national identity is based on it’s ability to recognize cultural diversity, while also treating all citizens as equals, regardless of their gender, race, culture, or religion. To ensure that this form of inclusion was extended to religious institutions Jefferson
This also shows how he violated not only freedom of speech and thought, but the freedom
The Pearl Harbor Address to the Nation by Franklin Delano Roosevelt was delivered on December 8, 1941 in Washington, D.C., a day after one of America’s largest tragedies. The bombing of Pearl Harbor is an event that is unforgettable and President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s speech in response to this shocking attack is one of the most significant speeches of all time. The significance of the speech is the fact that America joined into the fighting of World War II, something the Americans didn’t want to do at first. This speech has a stark resemblance to the speech George W. Bush gave after the terrorist attacks of The Twin Towers in New York City, an equally shocking event. FDR’s use of ethos, logos, and pathos was extremely effective in spurring
In Chamberlain's speech, "Why we Fight," Chamberlain utilized many rhetorical devices but pathos is the most powerful appeal due to the fact that it reminded the mutineers of the pride, hope, and fear of join the army into war. The mutineers who are exhausted are wanting to give up the fight because they did not see the possibility of winning the war. Chamberlain reminded the people of what they did so far and brings out their pride through his statement believing that, "we are an army out to set others free (Chamberlain 11). " Chamberlain's description of the army that the mutineers were in made them feel their importance in forming a free country. This becomes a moral boost which makes them truly believe that joining the army for a greater
As humans, we are all dispositioned to feel fear, suspicion, and anxiety towards secrecy. These discomforts have led more than a hand full of people to speculate secret societies comprised of super elite politicians, millionaires, presidents, and influential public figures are working against the general public, and rather focus on manipulating politics, wars, and worldwide events in order to control the world and form a totalitarian one world government better known as the New World Order. Apart from conspiracy theorists, large religious groups such as Christians also claim a New World Order is in our midst since it is stated in scriptures in the bible. From my point of view, I believe secret societies are formed so that the rich and powerful