Jonathan Schmitz: The Jenny Jones Murder, and Legal Insanity On March 6, 1995, the Jenny Jones show recorded an episode on secret crushes, where a gay man named Scott Amedure confessed to having a crush on a long time friend Jonathan Schmitz. Schmitz, at the time the revelation was confessed, seemed to display no issues of the news his friend just shared, so it was a surprise to find out that merely three days later Scott Amedure was shot and murdered on the front stairs of his home by none other than his “secret crush”, Jonathan. Reports say that days after the show was recorded, Schmitz found a suggestive letter left taped to his door by Amedure, and it set him off to a “temporary case of insanity” where he ended up purchasing a shotgun as well as some ammunition, returned to the residence where his associate lived, and shot him after he answered. Later, in the case of “The Jenny Jones Murder” defense lawyers used “Grave’s Disease” (autoimmune disorder which leads to over activity of the thyroid gland) and the Gay Panic Defense (panic caused by the threat of homosexuality resulting in assault or murder caused by temporary insanity) to alleviate punishment to their client. Both excuses were under the demise that their client, Mr. Schmitz, was insane at the moment of the crime, …show more content…
The legal definition of insanity differs from the medical definition of insanity, and due to this, there have been ongoing debates on whether or not
In 1836, the gruesome death of a prostitute encaptivated the public eye and began a newspaper frenzy that centered on a morbid fixation of the life and death of Helen Jewett. Patricia Cline Cohen's The Murder of Helen Jewett pieces together the facts of Helen's life and death in an attempt to describe gender inequality in America by giving a meticulous account of life in the 1830s. (Insert small biography) Around three in the morning on Sunday, April 10, 1836 Rosina Townsend, the madam of the brothel, was spurred from her bed at the south end of Thomas St by a man knocking on the front door.
There has been many law changes for determining insanity in the legal setting. The first major law change was the case of Andrea Yates who pleaded insanity after killing her five kids. Ms Yate suffered from postpartum mental illness, which at that time qualified for insanity. Her case was extremely conversional because many people believe that she knew the differences from right and wrong. Therefore, resulting into an outrage of people and a change in the law for insanity.
Brendan C Lindsay author of Murder State writes about the early stage of California the violence that occurred, genocide of native people in the time era of 1846 to 1873. There are two claims that Lindsay makes in the book about the violence towards the native people and the genocide created by democracy of the Euro Americans. He demonstrates these two arguments by first the Euro Americans coming into the native people’s territory and taking it away from them and also the democracy that killed all the innocent native Indians. In Lindsay’s book Murder state there are three sections to the book “Imaging Genocide”, “Perpetuating Genocide” and “Supporting Genocide”.
(Jeffrey Dahmer). There was no question whether or not he committed the crimes, instead the defense and prosecutors argued about his insanity. The defense argued that he was mentally ill and the prosecutors claiming that he knew what he was doing at the time of the crime, regardless if he had a mental disorder. (Jeffrey Dahmer). One of the defense experts claimed that Dahmer’s mental illness was necrophilia.
Prosecutor Park Dietz had claimed in his testimony that Andrea had gotten her idea to drown the children from an episode of Law and Order, in which a woman drowned her own children but got away with it through the insanity defense. The producers of the television show later came forward and stated that no such episode existed, Dietz simply melded together parts of separate programs. The Texas Court of Appeals decided that was reason enough for a retrial, considering the jury’s difficult primary decision could have been biased by false information. So, on June 26, 2006, five years after her sentencing to life in prison, Andrea’s retrial began. The prime reason why it is so difficult to declare someone not guilty by reason of insanity in Texas is the M’Naghten Rule.
Despite the fact that Dahmer had confessed to the murders of seventeen victims, he initially pleaded not guilty, but eventually changed his plea to “guilty by virtue of insanity” (Biography). The judge wanted the jury to have an “objective” point of view, so he appointed two psychiatrists to assess Jeffrey’s mental state at the time of the murders. Dr. George Palermo, forensic psychiatrist, concluded that because Dahmer had chosen never to defend himself when he was teased as a child, he had internal feelings of hostility. He also speculated that because of his chronic inability to form relationships, his frustrated homosexual desires had developed until he turned into a sexual sadist. Jeffrey’s aggressive, hostile tendencies turned into homicide after a while, and he would channel all his sexual desires into the killing of his victims.
My client Calvin Smith is not guilty due to reason of insanity. Mr. Smith is schizophrenic, considering the fact that he was able to hear ersatz noises, he has anosognosia that results in him denying his mental illness, as well as schizophrenics are known to have voices that tell them to do certain things- such as harm others, and themselves. With this information, the allegation is correct, he did murder the man. Although, he is not in the right mind to know it was wrong. This is because Calvin Smith is schizophrenic.
Unlike serial killers with psychopathy they manipulate the system to benefit their own means to an end. Allowing this disorder to fall into the insanity defense would feed into their disorder in that it would allow for the manipulation of the system to
“It was discovered that one psychiatrist, Park Dietz, had given testimony that turned out to be untrue. He had claimed that Yates got her idea to drown the children from an episode of Law and Order. It turned out that he had confused the plots of multiple episodes” (Andrea Yates, 2021). It was during this trial that Andrea Yates was found not guilty by the reason of insanity and was sent to a maximum-security state mental facility. The M'Naghten Rule, which states “all defendants are presumed to be sane unless they can prove that–at the time of committing the criminal act–the defendant’s state of mind caused them to (1) not know what they were doing when they committed said act, or (2) that they knew what they were doing, but did not know that it was wrong”
In Suzanne Lebsock’s A Murder in Virginia, 2003, the judicial proceedings of a court case are depicted after a women, Lucy Pollard, was found brutally slain in her own backyard. Most would think this to be a simple illustration of a murder trial, but this case comes with a twist. The twist is that the murder took place in rural Virginia in 1895. This is a time period that is characterized as post Reconstruction but before the implementation of the Jim Crow Laws. Being a Confederate state shortly after the Civil War, one would believe that race relations in Virginia would be extremely tumultuous, but this case just happens to fall in a small window of time in which relationships were surprisingly harmonious.
Many doctors and jurors pointed out good characteristics Dahmer showed in court, and focused on his possible “...mental illness, treatment needs, and prognoses….”(Ullman). “Dahmer’s lawyer…and … Milwaukee District Attorney…” needed to deny their disgust of Dahmer and the deterioration the city had endured due to his deeds (Ullman). Groups orientated around mental health and legal matters recorded pieces of Jeffrey’s trial in order to teach about “mental illness and the insanity defense”(Ullman). Another Dahmer apologist had
The American legal system is complex and ever changing it requires several years to grasp, over so many years there have been many different legal strategies tried and implemented. When accused of a crime there is a number of defenses that can be used in order to claim your innocence or be used to try and receive a lighter sentence. In the case of Albert Fish, the defendant had already confessed to the crime he was accused of, however, his lawyers tried to prove him to be legally insane and as a result stay off the death penalty. Albert Fish case was truly strange and stunned everyone who became aware of the case especially since the murders occurred in the 1924 - 1934 which was a time where children were often unsupervised and the community
What exactly defines one as “insane” versus “sane”, and where is the boundary between the two? Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s “The Yellow Wallpaper” explores exactly that: the short story initially seems to be a tale of a 19th century woman forced into the notorious rest cure popularized at the time by male doctors--however, as the plot progresses, it becomes a much deeper commentary not only on societal limitations imposed on women, but also on the blurred line separating sanity from insanity. Gilman explores the boundary between sanity and insanity with the usage of different literary elements; she expresses how the boundary is “paper-thin” through the usage of symbolism, shows the subtle conversion to insanity by utilizing a stream of consciousness
In the book “One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest” Ken Kesey shows that the “insanity” of the patients is really just normal insecurities and their label as insane by society is immoral. This appears in the book concerning Billy Bibbits problem with his mom, Harding's problems with his wife, and that the patients are in the ward
The defence argued that Dahmer was mentally ill was compulsed to kill. The defence stated that Dahmer was insane because of his necrophilia. The prosecution rejected the defence because they thought that Dahmer was not a necrophilia because he tried to create a submissive sexual partner with muriatic acid. Psychiatrist Park Dietz did not believe Dahmer was suffering from a mental illness because Dahmer tried to get his victim alone and he had prepared evidence, like pictures, of his victims, so he was not impulse killing. Forensic psychiatrist George Palermo believed that Dahmer murdered because of pent up aggression toward himself and he killed men because he wanted to kill the source of his homosexual attraction to them.