. From those 500,000 laborers, 200,000 black soldiers and circumnavigators, a multitude of them were former veterans, served in the armed forces (Holzer). The North now had more strategies and tactics. The discharged captives could also barricade forts, positions, stations, and other locations, and to other mens bateaus (Emancipation Proclamation Civil Rights in the United States). The Emancipation Proclamation proved superior, Lee capitulated his army at Appomattox Court near Lynchburg, Virginia. This ended the Civil War (Bodenner). By the time the Civil War ended, Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation had freed many laborers. By freeing the slaves, Lincoln hoped to dispossess the South of its prime source of labor and inspire escaped slaves …show more content…
It altered the course of the war, led to the impartiality of all blacks, and changed the future for the posterity. The Emancipation Proclamation altered the course of the war for the better. It was now moral responsibility to triumph the Confederacy and unbind the millions of African Americans held in subjugation (Bodenner). This document also changed the Civil War from a war of troubles to a campaign of human freedom (Emancipation Proclamation History.com). Amongst the Civil War, General Patrick Cleburne had mentioned how, “slavery, from being one of our chief sources of strength," had evolved into "one of our chief sources of weakness" (Bodenner). When the Emancipation Proclamation was released, all the slaves were freed leaving the white men to do the work for themselves (Holzer). This changed the course of the war because the white men were no longer free to fight in the war because they had to do their own work (Holzer). This meant that the Southern army no longer had many soldiers. It also meant that the North now had many more soldiers, who were also former slaves (Holzer). In addition, the Emancipation Proclamation led to the equality of all blacks. However, the ending of discrimination took another century of violence and prejudice for the equality of blacks. Although this may be true, the proclamation was an vital step in the direction of the closure of captivity (Emancipation …show more content…
4, Gale, 2010, pp. 129-131. Opposing Viewpoints in Context, http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/CX1337701570/OVIC?u=hatf96401&xid=9cfe3c96. Accessed 11 Jan. 2018.
“Emancipation Proclamation.” Civil Rights in the United States, edited by Waldo E. Martin, Jr. and Patricia Sullivan, Macmillan Reference USA, 2000. Opposing Viewpoints in Context, http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/BT2338230759/OVIC?u=hatf96401&xid=2ef941e6. Accessed 11 Jan. 2018.
“Emancipation Proclamation.” History.com, A+E Networks, 2009, www.history.com/topics/american-civil-war/emancipation-proclamation. Accessed 10 Jan. 2018.
Hollar, Sherman. Biographies of the Civil War and Reconstruction: Abraham Lincoln, Robert E. Lee, Ulysses S. Grant, and More. Chicago, Britannica Educational Pub., 2013.
Holzer, Harold. “Emancipation Proclamation.” World Book Advanced, World Book, 2018, www.worldbookonline.com/advanced/article?id=ar179440. Accessed 10 Jan. 2018.
McNeese, Tim. Civil War Leaders. New York, Chelsea House Publishers, 2009.
“obligation”. Roget’s 21st Century Thesaurus, Third Edition. Philip Lief Group 2009. 03 Feb. 2018. (-- removed HTML --)
Allen Guelzo and Vincent Harding approached Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation and the eventual abolition of slavery from two very different viewpoints. The major disagreement between them is whether the slaves freed themselves, or Abraham Lincoln and his Emancipation Proclamation freed them. Harding argued the former view, Guelzo took the later. When these essays are compared side by side Guelzo’s is stronger because, unlike Harding, he was able to keep his own views of American race relations out of the essay and presented an argument that was based on more than emotion. Allen Guelzo
The primarily focus of this paper is to address the studies of the African-American views, conflict, and treatments from the Southern states following The Civil War. Documents include “Black Codes of the State of Mississippi” and the “Address of the Colored Convention to the People of Alabama”. These documents provide shaped rules, laws, and statutes for black society among whites. Between the years of, 1865 and 1867, both Alabama and Mississippi took action and state their thoughts towards the end of slavery in the United States.
The Civil War maintained the union and freed the slaves. Reconstruction excluded the political focus on certain areas. However slaves were freed. They gained civil liberties and lost long term racial action. The union needed to effectively bring the south back to position, and the interest in the economy.
This is very important because the Emancipation Proclamation did what most people know about what happened in the Civil war and what the North was fighting for, ending slavery. The Emancipation Proclamation ended slavery in America, and also ended the crisis that slave states and free states that caused the Civil War, and likely would have caused another Civil war if they kept the free and slave states; because Abraham Lincoln passed the Emancipation Proclamation there was not another civil war. To show how important these are some differences that would happen if the the Emancipation Proclamation was never passed, or Abraham Lincoln gave up after the first attempt the U.S potentially could have had a second Civil War or slavery could still be in those slave states, or the Confederate States of America could be its own
“Slavery: From Declaration to Civil War” Introduction: Slavery is a topic that has been one of the most shocking yet natural around the world. Slavery is defined as “Coerced Labor” and “The most important form of labor in New World”. (Roark 72) This idea and action provokes mixed feelings in the heart and minds of everybody and still people allowed it.
In September of 1862, after a draft of the Emancipation Proclamation was released to the public New York Evening Post Editor, William Cullen Bryant editorialized: "Its puts us right before Europe.. It brings back our traditions; it animates our soldiers with the same spirit which led our forefathers to victory under Washington; they are fighting today, as the Revolutionary patriots fought, in the interests of the human race..” Abolitionists rejoiced at the Proclamation, for it finally showed a glimpse of a possibility that one day slavery in the United Sates of America would be non-existent. However, in Eric Coker’s article, Acclaimed historian discusses Lincoln and slavery, he states
American society, over the course of time, has shown itself to be profoundly resistant to change. In order for real change to occur in this nation either of these two must happen; a benefit to those in power or a viable threat. This is especially true in cases of civil rights and the nation's treatment of African Americans. As evidenced throughout American history, political and social change has only been allowed when it is advantageous to the nation's leaders and/ or economy. The emancipation proclamation, for instance, was not a result of President Lincoln’s abolitionist beliefs or moral compass, but a political strategy to win the civil war.
By taking a clear stance against the institution of slavery, it laid the groundwork for a national narrative that prioritized equality and freedom. The proclamation exposed the hypocrisy of a nation that espoused liberty while simultaneously allowing millions of enslaved individuals to suffer. As a result, it propelled the United States towards a greater recognition of human rights, inspiring future generations to fight for social justice and
Emancipation Proclamation DBQ Essay By: Sofia Fornaca When I was little, I’ll have to admit that I knew absolutely nothing about the Emancipation Proclamation, and just the Civil War in general. I thought the Civil War was just “another war,” and I can’t help but feel ignorant for not educating myself further. I didn’t seem to realize that it was a pretty brutal battle. The North wanted to abolish slavery, agitating the South.
Keene, Jennifer D., Saul Cornell, and Edward T. O’Donnell. Visions of America: A History of the United States. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc., 2013. Trott, S. “A Pro Slavery Letter by S. Trott.” Edited by TeachUSHistory.org.
Sources Analysis Freedom During the Reconstruction era, the idea of freedom could have many different meanings. Everyday factors that we don't often think about today such as the color of our skin, where we were born, and whether or not we own land determined what limitations were placed on the ability to live our life to the fullest. To dig deeper into what freedom meant for different individuals during this time period, I analyzed three primary sources written by those who experienced this first hand. These included “Excerpts from The Black Codes of Mississippi” (1865), “Jourdan Anderson to his old master” (1865), and “Testimony on the Ku Klux Klan in Congressional Hearing” (1872).
African American majority in the Southern States even after the emancipation proclamation still encounter segregation, oppression, disenfranchisement and racial violence. (National Park Service) The “separate but equal” doctrine was the foundation for discrimination which shines light on the dilemma of the African American people. With white ultimatum to dominate society using their unsupported white supremacist belief to intimidate and dissuade African American from their rights civil rights activists had to take the necessary step to protect the black American
When the Confederacy did not yield, Lincoln put the final Emancipation Proclamation into effect. After it was put in effect with the civil war was concluded, Lincoln could not have been prouder of enacting the order. “Heralded as the savior of the Union, President Lincoln actually considered the Emancipation Proclamation to be the most important aspect of his legacy. “I never, in my life, felt more certain that I was doing right, than I do in signing this paper,” he declared. “If my name ever goes into history it will be for this act, and my
Somebody once remarked, “No man is good enough to govern another man without the other's consent” (“Abraham Lincoln Quotes"). At the initial view, the Civil War was going to be won by the South. Nonetheless, all that changed when Abraham Lincoln constructed the Emancipation Proclamation because it did not solely free slaves, it further altered antiquity for the salutary and assisted the North in the war, which led to their triumph. The Emancipation Proclamation was Abraham Lincoln’s greatest achievement as president.
On September 2nd, 1862, Abraham Lincoln famously signed the Emancipation Proclamation. After that, there’s been much debate on whether Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation truly played a role in freeing the slaves with many arguments opposing or favoring this issue. In Vincent Harding’s essay, The Blood-red Ironies of God, Harding argues in his thesis that Lincoln did not help to emancipate the slaves but that rather the slaves “self-emancipated” themselves through the war. On the opposition, Allen C Guelzo ’s essay, Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation: The End of Slavery in America, argues in favor of the Emancipation Proclamation and Guelzo acknowledges Lincoln for the abolishment of slavery through the Emancipation Proclamation.