In 1963, Lindon B. Johnson inherited the White House from John F. Kennedy as well as the Vietnam War. Johnson vowed to not lose the war as he saw a Communist Asia would form if he failed to act correctly. When the counter insurgency in Vietnam began to fail, due to the Diem Coup, Johnson immediately increased America’s political and military presence in Vietnam. While being fully aware of the reports and documents he was given, he decided to intentionally mislead Congress as well as the public on America’s position in the war. Johnson and his administration knew that entering the war would be expensive and consuming, but they had motives to do so anyways. Johnson and his advisors had motives for the misleading because they sought to protect …show more content…
The first option was to pull out the remaining American men in Vietnam. If he were to withdraw the remaining men, he’d be seen as weak and coward like. The U.S. would also watch as communism would continue to spread throughout Asia. This would also contradict Johnson’s vow he made that indicated he would not lose the war. The Republicans would hit Johnson hard with this when he would decide to run for office in the approaching election. The second option was to send even more men into Vietnam to prevent the collapse of Vietnam which would halt the communist plague. This option, however, was massively more expensive for the taxpayers and government and more emotional for the American people. This would also severely impact his chances for support on the expensive proposed Great Society program. Essentially, either option would force Johnson to watch as his approval ratings plummet and his chances of election …show more content…
Even though Johnson knew the outstanding costs of this war, he decided on misleading the public and quietly sent more troops into Vietnam. He figured the billions of dollars and thousands of troops didn’t compare to his domestic welfare and poverty plan. Around 525,000 advisors were sent in; much more than the 16,000 that were previously there. American casualties were also immense. Johnson may have also thought he could’ve controlled Asia, prevented the spread of communism, and maintained his approval ratings by quietly sending the troops in. Johnson essentially delayed the debate of his actions in Vietnam till after the election in order to gather support for his legislation. Johnson was able to carry out the military escalation so quietly because of his lies regarding the Gulf of Tonkin. Johnson told the American people via television that two U.S. ships in the Gulf of Tonkin had been attacked again by North Vietnam forces. Although, this was not the case. The U.S. ships were partaking in aggressive intel gathering and evidence uncovered suggest the second attack in the Gulf of Tonkin never happened. Johnson knew the misinterpretation of the Gulf of Tonkin was essential if he wanted to escalate military and political presence in
McMaster also talked about how president Johnson believed that he would be able to control the U.S involvement in vietnam and part of that belief is based of of McNamara's confident assurance. (McMaster 333) Because of Lyndon B John secret decision made in Washington between November 1963 to July 1965, he got the United States deeper and deeper into the war. President Johnson also believed that it would be possible to preserve American credibility even if the U.S armed force withdrew from Vietnam (McMaster 332). He was totally wrong. “After the United States become committed to the war, however, more American soldiers, airmen,... had died in the conflict, it would become impossible simply to disengage and declare America’s credibility intact…”
Before the start of the Vietnam War, Johnson was in a difficult position in regards to Vietnam. He knew that increased aid for South Vietnam would decrease funding for his domestic programs, which were among his top priorities. He also knew that if he decreased support, that the nation would most likely fall under the Communists and this would be perceived as a loss for the United States and the Democrats. One of the factors that contributed to the start of the Vietnam War was when the North Vietnamese attacked U.S. warships in the Gulf of Tokin on August 2nd and 4th 1964. This was a small engagement in which North Vietnamese Torpedo boats caused light damage to the USS Maddox, and light North Vietnam casualties.
All things considered, it is not a fair assessment to call it “Johnson’s war” bearing in mind Nixon interfered, but to a certain point it is reasonable to call it so, because of the Tonkin Gulf resolution and because of Operation Rolling Thunder. The Tonkin Resolution put too much power into Johnson’s hands and allowed him to start a war without officially declaring one. In addition, Operation Rolling Thunder was a fail and helped the Viet Cong in finding a way to attack the American troops without showing themselves. Nixon going behind Johnson’s back and making a deal with the enemy made the war, to a certain degree, his fault as well. All in all, the Vietnam War should not be looked at as all Johnson 's fault, the blame is divided between
Lyndon B. Johnson made the Vietnam War his own by using manipulating. He used the media to get the support of the Congress. Media helped him manipulate Congress into coming on President Johnson side, so they could continue the war. The misinformation leads Congress to believe anything President told them. He informed them that the United States were the victims.
The reason for this was failing military strategies and protests by the American people.. One of the tactics he formulated was Vietnamization. On November 3, 1969 Vietnamization was televised nationally after negotiation between Nixon, his advisors, and the Secretary of Defense, Melvin Laird. As the History.com Staff explained it “[Vietnamization was] a gradual, phased withdrawal of American combat forces, combined with an expanded effort to train and equip South Vietnam to take over military responsibility for its own defense.” (1).
It was believed that President Johnson was not going to win the 1968 election because the American people was disappointed with Johnson’s leadership in Vietnam. “Years later, Barry Goldwater judged that the angry disillusioned American people forced Lyndon B. Johnson to abandon his hope for a second term” (Bornet, P. 228). However, Lyndon B. Johnson argued that his decision not to seek reelection had nothing to do with the American people view on his leadership in Vietnam. For instance, Johnson had been thinking not to seek reelection since August 26, 1964(Bornet, P. 289). During his presidency he felt that he would not be candidate for the 1968
Answer: Johnson was made president after the Civil War and had to deal with issues arising from conflict between Northerners and Southerners. Contrary to what Congress wanted, Johnson easily forgave the Confederacy and allowed them back into the Union after they swore allegiance to the United States. Johnson vetoed many laws that Radical Republicans proposed, such as those protecting former slaves. These actions caused Johnson to be the first president ever impeached. What measures and policies emerged from that
Now, In my opinion the 36th President of the United States, Lyndon B. Johnson had the most significant role in The Vietnam War because when he assumed the presidency, he inherited the escalating crisis in Vietnam. Lyndon B Johnson failed to see the importance of the war, and actually escalated it even more. Despite promises
Johnson was a democrat and a previous slave owner, which didn’t make him an avid supporter of Lincoln’s plan of Southern Reconstruction. What Lincoln had previously intended on doing was have criminal amnesty to Confederates who pledged allegiance to the Union and allowed states to hold a constitutional convention along with setting up their state government. Though Johnson kept some of the plan intact, he called for there to be no limits on voter allegiance for the Southern states. This sparked opposition from the Radical Republicans, a group of congressmen who believed black southerners should be guaranteed equality with whites. They deduced that Johnson shouldn’t set legislative policy for reconstruction as it wouldn’t lead to a country of tolerance that they worked to achieve.
The Vietnam War is considered one of the most controversial wars in United States history. The United States is one of the greatest superpowers at the time and were seen as the helping hand for doing the right thing. The United States were dragged into this war in order to stop the spread of communism throughout the Democratic South Korea. Many Americans saw this as the United States intervening in another country’s civil war which is not our duty. Americans also used the draft in a poor way affecting the young and African American population.
Nixon issued a policy of Vietnamization, which he hoped would decrease the need for American troops in Vietnam. However, this did not limit the war nor end the anti-war sentiment at home. Nixon, hoping to end North Vietnamese supply lines, launched American troops into the neutral Cambodia. This failed, and in the end brought widespread massacres and destabilized the region. As the war escalated, so did protests on college campuses.
One reason that reveals President Johnson’s principled motivation can be found in Doc A. L.B.J first job after college was being a teacher in Cotulla, Texas. He was teaching Mexican children who were poor but tried their best to learn and look nice for school. He wanted to teach this school of 5,6, and 7 graders because at the time there was poverty and segregation and was willing help even if
Psychologist Irving Janis explained some alarmingly bad decisions made by governments and businesses coined the term "groupthink”, which he called "fiascoes.” He was particularly drawn to situations where group pressure seemed to result in a fundamental failure to think. Therefore, Janis further analyzed that it is a quick and easy way to refer to a mode of thinking people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members ' striving for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action. According to Janis, groupthink is referred as the psychological drive for consensus at any cost that suppresses disagreement and prevents the appraisal of alternatives in cohesive decision-making groups.
Johnson was not what the United States had expected;
What options were available to President Johnson? To President Nixon? What were the advantages and disadvantages? When Johnson took the presidency he could have stopped support to South Vietnam, but he didn’t.