In 1892, one of the most brutal and intense crimes occurred. Many suspects were involved in the crime, but they never found the murder of Andrew and Abby Borden. In 1892, Abby and andrew Borden were murdered with an axe/hatchet. Seventeen swings in the back of the head. There were many suspects involved in the crime. None of them had enough evidence to be proved guilty. However, Lizzie Borden had the most, the daughter of andrew and Abby Borden. She was believed to be the murderer, but she was let off innocent because she still didn't have enough evidence to be proved guilty.In my opinion, Lizzie did murder her parents and is fairly guilty. LIzzie Borden is guilty because no one else could have done it. The only one in the house at the time was Lizzie Borden. Also, they found no evidence that someone came in and just murdered mr. and mrs. Borden. Another reason why I think she committed the murder was because she was having conflict with her mother All in all, Lizzie had to have been guilty because she had the most evidence out of everybody else that was considered a suspect. …show more content…
Luckily, the person she asked refused to sell it to her. In the article, it says, “They did, however establish that Lizzie had unsuccessfully attempted to purchase prussic acid, a highly poisonous liquid, in the days before the murders.” The previous evidence tells you that Lizzie tried to get a hold for poisonous acid. This failed attempt made it a little suspicious. Especially because it was a few days before the murder. This explains why Lizzie could have been the murder. After all, she did have the most evidence out of everyone that was considered a
Evidence points to the fact that Lizzie Borden, a normal woman who people thought was not capable of such a crime, is guilty. Lizzie Borden was guilty because, besides the maid, she was the only person in the house. She also had a motive, a motive to get her wealthy father’s money. It could only be her. She was the only one who would have the motive and would have done the crime.
The police said it was a destruction of evidence. If Lizzie killed her parents and did not want to get caught, burning the evidence was the easiest way
Lizzie Borden is the main suspect of her fathers and step mothers deaths. Lizzie Borden lived with her father and step mother, Andrew and Abby Borden. When Emma and Lizzie were younger they went through two tragic lost in the family. There little sister died when she was only two years old, and there mother Sarah Borden also died. Lizzie and Emma lived with their father and step mother, they didn't really care for their step mother Abby.
It is clear that Lizzie Borden committed this crime because of the evidence against her, the rage in the murders, and
This may well prove her guilt in that she tried to find the least suspicious place to be during the murders. The police found a bucket of bloody towels in the basement of the Borden home, and they were told that Lizzie had been menstruating. The head of an axe was also found (“Vengeful Daughter”). While Lizzie could have been on her period, it is a shocking coincidence that the two events coincided. Perhaps the most suspicious evidence would be the fact that Lizzie burned a dress the day after her parents funeral.
Plus, she also tried to buy poison, but thankfully failed. Was that almost the way she was going to murder? Lizzie had an argument with her parents, just one week before the murders and chose to stay in a separate home for four days. Adding on to having an argument, just a few days before the murders, Lizzie tried to buy toxins. Although the police could not present the purchasing in the trial and the idea that all families have frenzied arguments, Lizzie definitely is guilty.
Which I think they could've found out who did it if it had happened in this time were we can use computers , criminal investigators, microscopes and forensics to research evidence and we have more education in the human body and education on causes of death that were not available in 1892.. One of the daughter Lizzie displays actions that would make her a great suspect in her parents due to negative behaviors and actions, according to her neighbors that lived near them. However they did not have enough evidence in the trial to convict the two sisters. (Conclusion)
Lizzie Borden is Guilty Many cases were named “Trials of the 19th Century”. Lizzie Borden’s trial was one of them. Lizzie was put on trial for the murder of her father and step mother.
She couldn’t be in the barn because Bridget Sullivan would have seen her whilst running between the windows and the barn to refill her pail. The same goes for if Lizzie was outside. All of theses defenses that seem to have all happened at the same time are proof that Lizzie is guilty for murdering her parents. Even if they were made up due to Morphine, the very first one she gave, being in the barn getting a piece of iron was definitely a white lie, because neighbors and the maid have seen
“Lizzie Borden took an axe, And gave her mother forty whacks, When she saw what she had done, She gave her father forty-one” (Linder). Lizzie Borden, daughter of Andrew and Sarah Borden, was born on July 19, 1860 in Fall River, Massachusetts. Her older sister Emma Borden was born on March 1, 1851. They lived a happy and normal life until the unexpected death of their mother, Sarah Borden. Three years later Andrew Borden was remarried to Abby Durfee Gray.
The Lizzie Borden case is popular and continues to keep our interest. Not only does it interest us, it keeps us guessing who did the crime. The public opinion that Lizzie Borden killed her parents is because she hated parents, the crime scene evidence, and her mental instability. Lizzie might have killed her parents out of hate.
Murderers are people who kill people and murders also are guilty. Murderers are usually always guilty. Murders sometimes get away with it if they don’t get caught and move to a different country or state to hide from the police and be around people you don’t know. Murders are usually caught. Murders are bad and there needs to be a stop.
Not much evidence was provided to believe such accusations. More of the idea of Lizzie experiencing child neglect was clearer to see through others eyes, therefore developing sociopathic behavior causing her to attack her father and stepmother. Prior to the murder of Andrew Borden and Abby Borden was an average normal day for the Bordens. The day start off with breakfast, although, Lizzie “Seldom dined with her father and stepmother,” (Douglas and Olshaker, 2000, p.98).
Lizzie kept changing her story every time she was interviewed for her family's murder. Despite the evidence, Lizzie was set free. There are many theories about what might had happened. Andrew Borden was a rich man, but was very unpopular. Lizzie, Emma, sister of Lizzie, John Morse, uncle of the two girls, and the family maid were all suspects of the murder of Andrew Borden.
I think that Lizzie borden is guilty because of these reasons. Her stories were all over the place and the details were always different. There was no scuffle or any kind of trying to fight back between either of them. The rooms were clean after the murder. How could anyone clean up so quickly without being caught?