I have chosen Chapter 69 of Unit 5, “Taking Action: An Insider’s View of Lobbying”. I chose this chapter in order to learn more about lobbying and lobbyist in general as well as how it relates to nursing. Merriam-Webster’s dictionary defines lobby as “an organized group of people who work together to influence government decisions that relate to a particular industry, issue, etc.” (Lobby, n.d.). The highly controversial phenomenon known as lobbying is associated with many negative connotations related to government. The very act of lobbying and the lobbyist has a preconceived notion that they are riddled with corruption and bribery. To society, they are the bad guys and cause the government to be dominated by powerful special interest groups that are only out for themselves and to increase their wealth. However, I wanted to get a fresh perspective on lobbying and to determine if its utilization has any positive attributes as it relates to nursing.
This chapter was very enlightening. It allowed me to view how lobbying as a Registered Nurse can help advance
…show more content…
I am no longer ignorant of many of the good policies and bills enacted that were assisted by the hard work of lobbyist and nursing political action committees. Prior to reading this chapter, I viewed many lobbyist as soldiers for a litany of corporatist that are greedy and only seek power without a care in the world for the average American citizen. Lobbying was making an attempt to overthrow democracy in favor of a plutocracy. However, I have learned that you cannot paint all lobbyist or the act of lobbying with a broad brush. Each of the lobbyist and their requests or positions on issues should be scrutinized and the focus placed on the probable outcomes as a result of what they are proposing. According to Dickson
Hamilton (2004) argues these opinions in saying, “ Lobbying is a key element of the legislative process- part of the free speech guaranteed under the constitution… lobbying is simply people bonding together to advance their interests” (p. 83). Instead of lobbying being manipulative, as people seem to think, Hamilton explains it as being helpful to Congress and an import part of debates.
Now that lobbyists cannot utilize earmarks, traditionally the most direct way for a member of Congress to do a lobbyist’s bidding, because of the informal ban in Congress on earmarks, lobbyists are no longer receiving this kind of direct funding for their projects. Nonetheless, the presence of lobbyists will not fade. Lobbyists serve a vast array of interests, and reflect the diversity of the United States in what they represent. Today lobbyists are more powerful than ever, attempting to buy influence on issues, and are also more accountable than ever before. Allen concludes with asserting that since lobbyists represent interests at least some Americans hold, Americans cannot think that lobbyists are the
Samuel Sierzega 10/7/2015 BUSN 118 Lobbyists: Kings of the Hill The United States ' political system has been abused by years of corruption. This corruption is not hidden by cover ups or even conspiracy theories composed by nuts wearing tin foil hats, it is in plain sight. Corporations, lobbyists and congress have been engaging in a vicious cycle of corruption. Congress has abused their power of public servants by accepting this legal bribery. An amendment to the constitution needs to be added so money can be taken out of politics to provide fair elections to elect congressmen that stand for the people, and not special interest groups.
FMLA and ACA in regards to APRN or NPs Introduction The Affordable Care Act created new health care delivery and payment models that emphasize teamwork, care coordination, value, and prevention: models in which nurses can contribute a great deal of knowledge and skill. Indeed, the nursing profession is making a wide-reaching impact by providing quality, patient-centered, accessible, and affordable care. - Institute of Medicine
Grants, Contracts and Interest Group Lobbying Behavior” Beth Leech tries to discover a relationship between organizations who lobby and the Congressional funding that comes along with it. There are laws put into place at the federal level to prevent corrupt lobbying; however, they are unsuccessful and these laws have loopholes that allow for corporations to have questionable lobbying practices. One of the major policies in place says that corporations cannot use their federally awarded funds to lobby; instead corporations use their privately awarded funds, often given through donations. This use of loopholes is the cause of much tension between Congressional officials and corporations and there is a heated debate as to whether or not to enact stricter policies in the lobbying world.
For this week’s discussion board submit I selected to discuss the lobbying systems in Congress for AARP (American organization of Retired persons). AARP is a u.S. Founded non-executive organization and interest group, its membership institution is for people who are aged 50 and over. The institution was once founded by using Helen Percy Andrus, PhD in 1958. Intently tied to congressional Democrats, AARP is the largest non-industry lobbying workforce in the United States, paying lobbyists large sums to petition Congress and federal corporations on issues of social and political import. In 2008, the businesses $27.9 million in lobbying bills have been passed simplest via those of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Exxon Mobil.
The following analysis will expand upon one of the congressional caricatures observed in Hamilton 's article: the act of lobbying misrepresents the public 's opinion and should not be endorsed. Hamilton proposes a precisely balanced approach to lobbying. He states that lobbyists are principled people who play a large part of focussing the public 's attention on significant issues and are key to helping Congress members stay informed. He emphasizes that those who practice lobbying do so, in the open, as part of "the broader policy debate" (as cited in Stinebrickner, 2015, p. 117). As a previous member of congress, Hamilton 's opinion on the matter is soon justified and I agree with him.
This essay will discuss the impact of lobbyist on legislation in Washington, DC and the amount of dollars spent to influence federal policies. Throughout a normal day in Washington DC, the hustle and bustle of lobbyist is taking place in the Capital building, White House and along K Street, which is the home of many of the lobbying firms. There are special interest groups, corporations and industries that hire in-house lobbyist or lobbyist firms to influence legislation to benefit their cause. For example, some of these causes may include, but are not limited to tax breaks, subsidies and changes to current regulations or laws.
Lobbying in D.C Lobbying in Washington, DC has greatly expanded over the last three decades and lobbyists spend a lot of money in this activity. In 2009 alone about $3.47 billion was spent on direct lobbying expenses by politically active organizations. This is three times higher than the amount spent in 2006, and almost 7 times the approximated $ 200 million spent in lobbying expenses in 1983. Way back in 1981, a total of 7, 000 organizations were listed in the Washington, DC Representatives directory. Currently, the number has doubled to 14, 000 organizations which indicates the high lobbying rates in Washington DC (Drutman, 2009).
Lobbying is the is the effort to influence policy formulation and decision-making with a view to obtaining some designated result from government authorities and elected representatives (Council of Europe, 2013). ' Pressure groups' are a key element of politics and their activity is an indispensable and legitimate aspect of the legislative process. However, in light of recent scandals involving lobbyists and legislators, the public perception of the phenomenon is highly-distorted. Lobbying is reduced to a grey area where individual interests meet those of the political class. This conception of lobbying is closely linked to the lack of effective regulatory regimes.
Nurses can offer their experience along with knowledge to make an impact on issues in health care. The lawmaking process is often complex and requires so much work and effort from many individuals. Vital information from lobbyist and advocates help shape legislations and forever change health care policies. When nurses unite as a group, they pose as a dynamic power so lobbying is a great way to have our voices heard. If we as nurses were to partake in policies that we feel passionate about, then we have power to change health care for the
4. They are source of ideas and innovations. Lobbyists can’t introduce bills, but they can introduce an idea to and politician who will be eager to attach the lobbyists name
Rhetorical Analysis on an Exposia of Nursing Ethics In the essay “ Nursing’s Code of Ethics, Social Ethics, and Social Policy,” Marsha D. Fowler explains the history of Nursing ethics and what should be utilized in today’s society. Fowler explains to her readers what nurses should promote within the healthcare field. The purpose of her essay is to persuade her audience, whom are Nurses or someone who has background knowledge, into taking action. In order to explain the importance of ethics, Fowler uses two primary arguments emphasising, nurses need to have a stronger voice in policy making and they need to follow the code of ethics which was set for them.
When you work in this field you can find yourself in meetings with lobbyists,
Lobby could be defined as the process in which a person or a group of people try to influence the government or the public institutions in order to obtain a public policy implemented. It is probably one the oldest occupation in the world. Everywhere there is power, and people in power, there are lobbyists. The lobby can be carried out by a person, a group of people (working for profit or non-profit organisation) or an agency working with various clients (for example Central Lobby Consultants –CLC- in England).