Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X are very important historical figures. Throughout the Civil Rights Movement they have created two different approaches. The beliefs grew from their childhood. King grew up in a middle class family and was well educated. Malcolm X however, grew up in a deprived atmosphere that was very harsh and he had barely any schooling. Throughout his Civil Rights campaign, Martin Luther King practiced nonviolence. No matter what he went through he would turn the other cheek. It was a successful strategy that earned him the publicity the movement needed. Martin Luther King Jr. religious preference was Christian and Malcolm X was a Muslim. He believed in Muslim laws. Malcolm believed in transpiring violence unlike the
They were both highly influential leaders who wanted equality for the African American race around the nation. Although Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X had few similarities , they also had many differences in their early life, ideology and achievements. Martin Luther King Jr. also known as MLK, was the son of a baptist minister from Atlanta, Georgia. He attended Morehouse College and graduated from Boston University
MLK VS. Malcolm X Revolution, rebellion, revolt, uprising, riot,, these words all mean the same thing. The dictionary defines revolution as a forcible overthrow of a government or social order in favor of a new system but also claims that revolution is a dramatic and wide reaching change in the way something works or is organized or in peoples ideas about it. Revolution is the idea that you can bring about change in order to fulfill your rights as a human being. Over the course of history there is been many revolutions, such as the American Revolution.
Civil rights has always been and will always be an extremly controversial topic. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcom X are both large figure heads in the progression of civil rights throughout the United States. Both of these men took very different aproaches towards civil rights; each benefiting the progression in many different ways. Martin Luther King Jr. taking a more subtle and less aggresive approach, compared to Malcom X's violent and aggressive approach. Although, they both took different approaches their work has many different benefits to the work they performed, but overall King had more of an impact on American society.
The last reason why MLK is better suited to be leader is because of MLK and Malcolm X childhood which may have affected them to become the person they are like MLK grew up in a safe and loving environment and Malcolm X grew up with racism and harassments which probably led him to see a different perspective as MLK who has grew up in a loving and secure environment. For example, “the family faced frequent harassment from white supremacist groups,”. This suggests that Malcolm X had a longer experience with harassment and racism which gives him a different side from MLK. An example of why MLK grew up safely is, “Martin Luther King Jr entered school at age 5, skipped two grades in high school, and entered Morehouse College.” MLK grew up in a different
Both Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X wanted to improve the lives of African Americans. Martin Luther King Jr. wanted to use an aggressive approach, but Malcolm X wanted to use his words to get through to his community. Although neither of them agreed with the other's ideas and goals, they both wanted to fight for the same reason, African Americans. Martin Luther King Jr. was always against violence, and he thought using a nonviolent arsenal weapon, like boycotting, and believed it would help create peace with all races. The text says, "Along with the march as a weapon for change in our nonviolent arsenal must be listed the boycott."
Malcolm X, who had come from a poor home in the North, had focused on the economic aspect of the Civil Rights movement through more violent take on getting his word out. Martin Luther King Jr was a major influence to the Civil Rights movement. Therefore, his non-violent
In document K, it states that he doesn't favor violence but condoned if necessary. This means that Malcolm X never wanted to hurt anyone, but he believed that we should protect ourselves from racists or other conflicts. Another reason would be from document I, it addresses that communication from all sides of a story is key. This statement means that if you explain
Both Martin Luther King and Malcolm X are good at presenting the solutions to their audience through their rhetoric respectively. Unlike Malcolm X who is a loyal believer in violence, Martin Luther King’s tactics appealed to the public through integrating Gandhi’s nonviolent ideas in the civil rights movement. His experiences did play a crucial part on the way when he explored and delved into the true meaning of non-violence (violence). In February and March 1959, King went to India to visit Mahatma Gandhi with his wife. During this trip, Gandhi’s non-violent thoughts had inspired King and it gave him confidence that his non-violent strategy could make a huge impact to both races in this civil rights movements.
Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X had been very important leaders to the Civil Rights movement. Their differing philosophies had made them unique, and brough differing perspectives to the 1960s. In the 1960s, society had been cruel in their treatment of African-Americans. Segregation was still in place, and hate and violence to African Americans had been at a high. The Civil Rights movement had been a big step for African-americans as they fighted for equal rights and the end of segregation.
One reason that people believe in Malcolm X’s greater leadership is his opposition to non-violent strategies as a way to make a change. Malcolm X pushed his fellow Black Americans to “protect themselves against white aggression by any means necessary” (Malcolm X). While having a strong public following that advocated self-defense, this leader demanded change in ways different from Martin Luther King. The audience in support of Malcolm X believed aggression was the best way to achieve a goal and praised that approach to end discrimination.
In the articles I have read about Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X I have noticed these men have very different styles on how they want to help with segregation. Malcolm was about self defence and to fight back. But Martin Luther King Jr was all about no violence and not fighting back. He believed that the best way to protest was to have a silent protest. This was when people would either go to diners or any public places and they wouldn’t get food, but they would sit on the bench and they wouldn't fight.
It took the military to allow nine African Americans students to enter a school in a white neighborhood. This is only one event, other events created riots, bombings, discrimination, poverty, and racism. This is why Malcolm X’s philosophy is much better for the sake of time and our nation. Malcolm X
Philosophical differences between martin luther king and malcolm X The philosophical differences between Martin Luther King and Malcolm X have to do with the their protest strategies. MLK never fought with violence. Although he would get physically attacked, he stood his ground and continued to fight for equality peacefully. King believed that whites and blacks should come together to end the hate and violence.
Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were two influential men who served as important figures for the Civil Rights Movement. The two men came from diverse backgrounds and had contrasting views in life about religion and African American’s stance in society. Malcolm X was born in Nebraska and had great amounts of exposure to racism. Martin Luther King was born in an educated family in Atlanta, where he experienced racism, but to a lower extreme than Malcolm X. Although they passed away long time ago, they continue to live on today in a world independent of segregation. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X used opposing principles to achieve equality for blacks; King utilized integration of both races and nonviolence as opposed to Malcolm X who separated the same races and employed non violence so as to achieve the same goal.
The men had contrasting ideas when it came to fighting for racial equality. Martin Luther King’s philosophies made more sense than Malcolm X’s philosophies, because King believed in working together and nonviolence protests to change the minds of the white society. Where Malcolm X believed in working separately to gain independence for the black communities, so