William Jennings Bryan once said, “Never be afraid to stand with the minority when the minority is right, for the minority which is right will one day be the majority”. Standing up to the majority is vital, it gives individuals the opportunity to express their individual, unique opinions and experiences. It allows the majority to become open to diversity and the cultures that come along with it. This has been shown throughout history, Martin Luther King Jr’s “I Have a Dream” speech, is an instance of this. This speech encapsulated all that he was fighting for, for the African American minority in America and their rights. MLK standing up to the majority of white people was a significant piece of American and African American history and was …show more content…
The play 12 Angry Men is about a jury of twelve men that are given the task of deciding the fate, guilty or not guilty, of a young boy accused of murdering his father. The theme of standing up against the majority is very prevalent in this story because of the decisions some of the jurors make throughout the play. Juror 8 makes the decision to vote not guilty, he is the one and only juror in this play that decides to vote not guilty for the boy in the beginning. The other eleven jurors decide to vote guilty because of the evidence that they have been presented with. The act of Juror 8 standing against the majority of the other jurors about the case, voting not guilty, allows the jurors to thoroughly dissect the case, understanding it fully and thoughtfully before making their decision of guilty or not guilty. Without this, the boy would have been given an unfair trial, and possibly had been prosecuted wrongly for a crime he didn’t do. The play wouldn’t have been able to continue without this, because the jurors would simply convict him as guilty and the boy would be put in jail. This play is a perfect example of how standing up to the majority is prevalent and …show more content…
Throughout time, there have been groups of people that have been mistreated, and have organized movements that they hope will help them get the rights they deserve. Not only has this happened in the past, it happens everyday across the world. There are many minorities in our society and each day, these minorities stand up to the majority in a variety of ways. There’s also groups of people that have experienced the same things that make a minority. For example, women have recently been opening up about experiencing sexual assaults, standing up to the men that have assaulted them. They have done this in a variety of ways, such as a coming from a legal standpoint in trying to get the men put in jail for the crime and posting about it on social media with the hashtag #metoo. These women are standing up to the men that have done them wrong, trying to find justice for themselves and the array of women across the world that have been through this traumatic experience. Another example is people of the LGBTQ community advocating for themselves in numerous ways. There have been numerous LGBTQ marches to spread awareness and their right to be equal to everyone else in our world. The people of the LGBTQ community are standing up to the majority, standing up to the people that don’t treat them as equals, or treat them unfairly. As a result of standing up for themselves, these women have received, or are in the
12 Angry Men, a short story based on bias and making rational decisions. When put in a hot airy room, tensions rise up for these men. In the play, the main protagonist is Juror No.8, he is also the hero. With that being Juror No. 8 could be a hero in many different ways. During the play he states “I don’t want to change your mind.
In, Twelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, there is a group of twelve jurors that are deliberating about a homicide case in New York. There are two jurors, Juror 3 and Juror 11, who have very different backgrounds and they disagree on a lot of things. Juror 11 is a German immigrant who views America as a new life of happiness while Juror 3 is an entrepreneur who is very proud of himself for having his own business. Throughout Act 1, the two jurors show how different they view America. For example, Juror 11 chooses to change his stance on the case to “Not Guilty” and when he does people start yelling at him.
In Twelve Angry Men written by Reginald Rose a jury of twelve men debate whether the young defendant will be acquitted or found guilty. Juror eight is the protagonist who supports the defendant and fights for what he thinks is right. With the sympathy, persuasion, and openmind of juror eight the young defendant was acquitted. Juror eight exemplifies a man of sympathy and consideration.
Imagine a world of complete segregation, where everything you do is with people only of your race. A world without freedom which is what our country stands for. It’s a ridiculous thought to have lived through. Such leaders of the Civil Rights movement thought that it was outlandish as well. MLK and Malcolm X, two strong leaders of the Civil Rights movement, had two completely different strategies for changing that reality in their day to day life.
In the play “12 Angry Men’’ by Reginald Rose, there are twelve jurors who are gradually revealed to have very different personalities, motivations and opinions. Juror #3 is portrayed as the main antagonist as his points on why the boy is guilty or innocent have a crucial role over the course of the play. We can say that Juror #3 has a rigid opinion and is not really used to people disagreeing or arguing with him as the play shows, as soon as he had an argument with Juror #8, he verbally attacks him and while some of the other Jurors are holding him back, he says “Let me go! I’ll kill him. I’ll kill him!”
These abusers are still not called out. They can afford the best lawyers and still get to keep their CEO positions. Therefore, it is laudable that the movement is getting attention as there is power in numbers, but we don’t want the light to be completely taken off the minority and shine on the women with influence alone. Furthermore, this brings home the point about women of color and ‘the voice,’ because the movement was started by a black woman in the Bronx, but is now popular on social media because an influential white woman tweeted
Twelve Angry Men was about a group of jurors struggle to come with a verdict for a murder case. In the beginning, all but one tenacious juror believed that the eighteen year old boy was guilty of murdering his father. The main problem of the story was that the jurors verdict had to be unanimous. Through the process of trying to get each other to change positions, the jurors face many arguments and disagreements. The jurors personalities clash multiple times because each one has a different view on things and are adamant in their decisions.
For example, Colin Kaepernick continues to kneel in protest during the national anthem when to everyone else, the words of the song touch their hearts. The football player has received death threats and fans have burned his jersey, but he has propelled through it all to protest the mistreatment of minorities in America, and he does it peacefully too. Just like the aforementioned hero, Kaepernick is using his platform to raise awareness for injustice and inequality. Although there are still many issues in America that need to be mended, Martin Luther King Jr’s actions continue to reverberate throughout society. He serves as a constant reminder that there will always be someone willing to fight tooth and nail for positive
However, in the play,“12 Angry Men”, the eighth juror sets prejudice aside and reexamines the testimony of the first witness, the second witness, and the direction of the stab wound, with an unbiased view. First, the old man claims that he saw the boy run down the stairs, right after he told his father, “I”ll kill you!”. Although he may have seen it, juror eight states, “The length of the hall is forty-three feet, six inches. Now he had to get up out of the bed, walk twelve feet, open the bedroom door, walk forty-three feet and open the door all in fifteen seconds.
‘Twelve Angry Men’ written by Reginald Rose, is based on the story of a jury who have to come together to determine the fate of a young boy accused to have murdered his own father. Initially, eleven of the jurors vote not guilty with one of the juror being uncertain of the evidence put before them. As the men argue over the different pieces of evidence, the insanity begins to make sense and the decision becomes clearer as they vote several other times. Rose creates drama and tension in the jury room, clearly exploring through the many issues of prejudice, integrity and compassion, in gaining true justice towards the accused victim. These aspects have been revealed through three character who are Juror 10, Juror 8 and Juror 3.
In 12 Angry Men, the movie begins in a courtroom where the case is being discussed by the judge, who seems fairly uninterested. The jurors are then instructed to enter the jury room to begin their deliberations. They take a vote and all but juror 8 vote guilty. The jurors react violently to the dissenting vote but ultimately decide to go around the table in hope of convincing the 8th juror.
All the victims speaking up for the movement indicates that they will no longer tolerate the silencing of their voices because of political and social power. The movement is a great example of how intersectionality is considered in modern day issues and is a very effective tool for creating consideration of all factors in
The justice system that relies on twelve individuals reaching a life-or-death decision has many complications and dangers. The play Twelve Angry Men, by Reiginald Rose, illustrates the dangers of a justice system that relies on twelve people reaching a life-or-death decision because people are biased, they think of a jury system as an inconvenience, and many people aren’t as intelligent as others. The first reason why Reiginald illustrates dangers is because people can be biased or they can stereotype the defendant. The Jurors in Twelve Angry Men relate to this because a few of them were biased and several of them stereotyped the defendant for being from the slums. The defendant in this play was a 19 year old kid from the slums.
Inequality and racial discrimination have been prevalent in the lives of the black community as well as others for many years. It is inequality that has deprived these minorities of the possibilities and opportunities to become someone in society. Yet, Martin Luther King sought to contradict these traditional norms of society and fight back with peace and kindness to give a voice to those who were shunned. Throughout history, black people were not able to do many things such as attend a school with white children, vote, sit at the front of a bus and have an opinion. Of course, they became tired of living a restricted life where they were oppressed and discriminated against for the color of their skin.
The movie “Twelve Angry Men” illustrates lots of social psychology theories. This stretched and attractive film, characterize a group of jurors who have to decide the innocence or guiltiness of an accused murder. They are simply deliberating the destiny of a Puerto Rican teenaged boy accused of murdering his father. Initially, as the film begins, except the juror Davis (Henry Fonda), all other jurors vote guilty. Progressively, the jurors begin trying to compromise on a point that everybody agree because the decision of the jury has to be unanimous.