Maryland Vs Pringle Case Study
Case Citation: Maryland v. Pringle 540 U.S. 366, Ct.795, 157 L. Ed.2d 769 (2003) Parties: Joseph Jermaine Pringle, Plaintiffs / Appellants State of Maryland, Defendant / Appellee Facts: Pringle, was a passenger in a car that was stopped for speeding. Upon stopping the car, the arresting officer after asking for a consensual search and found money in the glove compartment and cocaine in the back-seat armrest. The officer arrested all three occupants of the car and Pringle was convicted for possession with intent to distribute cocaine after he signed a written confession. Pringle appealed, arguing that probable cause to arrest him did not exist. Procedural History: The Court of Special Appeals for Baltimore County affirmed the conviction and …show more content…
The majority explained that the Fourth Amendment, as applied to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, allows for officers to arrests without a warrant where officers have probable cause to believe a suspect has committed a crime in the presence of the officer. In this case, the officers undoubtedly concluded that a felony had been committed, and the question for the Court was if the officers had sufficient probable cause to believe that Pringle had committed a crime. According to Chief Justice Rehnquist, that question was a fact dependent investigation as to whether circumstances allowed officers to conclude not only that a crime was committed but to have specific suspicion of Pringle. In the written opinion Justice Rehnquist stated that three men riding in a car where drugs are found, with all three suspects denying possession, affords officers probable cause to conclude that one or all have committed a crime. The Court rejected Pringle’s assertion that the probable cause in this case amounted to “guilt by association,” distinguishing this case from others in which searches of groups had been limited. As explained by Chief Justice Rehnquist the passenger compartment of the car was a small, confined area, adequate to assume knowledge if not a mutual understand of the presence of drugs within the vehicle. Accordingly, individual probable cause existed to support Pringle’s arrest by the police, and his confession was admissible, and his conviction should
Us Vs Clemons Case Study
514 Words | 3 PagesThey appealed the ruling. Issues presented or questions of law: (1) The first issue is whether the court had sufficient evidence to prove special agent Althouse was in the line of duty, in accordance with 18U.S.C.&1114. (2) Whether the court erred in improperly admitted evidence of an uncharged misconduct is relevant to this case (3) Whether the Plaintiff erred in cross-examine the codefendant about drug use. Arguments or Objectives of the parties: Plaintiff: The Plaintiff argues that Special Agent Althouse was in a duty status, according to 18 U.S.C. &1114, when carjacked.
Maryland Vs Pringle Case Study
217 Words | 1 PagesFacts: Police pull over a car with Joseph Pringle and two other people in the car, and Pringle was in the front seat of the car, when law enforcement officials search the car. Police officers discover in the car baggies of cocaine in the back seat of the car and $763 in the compartment up front. None of the three people in the car would confess to whom the drug belonged to and so all of them were arrested. When arriving at the police station Pringle admitted that the cocaine belong to him and then he was charged with intent to sell and possession of cocaine. Pringle then stated that there was no probable cause to arrest him, and the Maryland court system stated there was probable cause and proceed to convict him (Maryland v Pringle 540 U.S.
Case Study: Police Officer Vs. Rodriguez Car
135 Words | 1 PagesB. The police officer tried to make it look like he had a probable cause to search Rodriguez car. C. I believe that Rodriguez was to prevail in court, because the Police officer should not of allowed his dog to sniff Rodriguez car without a warrant and after the dog found something he said he had probable cause but without the dog he didn 't even had a probable cause.
Ronald Rompilla Vs Jeffrey A Beard Summary
890 Words | 4 PagesA decision held that under the Sixth Amendment, the defendant’s counsel had not met the standards of reasonable competence required of a defense. Even if a defendant and their family suggested that no mitigating evidence was available, it is required to use reasonable effort in obtaining and reviewing materials that the counsel expects prosecution to use as evidence during sentencing. The reasoning behind this decision argued that Rompella’s trial counsel did not make sensible efforts to examine the files on Rompilla’s prior convictions for rape and assault. The Court stated that the counsel should have known prosecution would present those files to the jury during sentencing, and that the information on Rompilla’s prior conviction would have found mitigating evidence about his mental health, childhood, and alcoholism that could have been used for a proper
Tennessee Vs Garner Case Study
260 Words | 2 PagesIn the case of Tennessee vs Garner 471 US 1 1985 Edward Garner a 15 year old young man broke into a house, he was found hiding outside in the backyard by responding Officer Elton Hymen. Gardner made a fatal decision to flee even after being ordered by the police to stop, Garner tried to climb a six foot fence at that point officer Hymen shot and killed Garner. In this case the U.S. Supreme Court declared the “Fleeing Felon Doctrine” unconstitutional in that it violated the Fourth Amendment in that it was an unreasonable seizure. In Justice White delivery of the Courts opinion they “conclude that such force may not be used unless it is necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant
RV Stinchcombe's Case: Precedent Set For Canada
880 Words | 4 PagesNow, after the case it is made sure that an accused person has a fair trial, the case established a right of proper information in criminal proceedings, which is essential to the fair trial of an accused person. The ruling has given better communication between the prosecution and defence and has given defence counsel the tools they need to represent their clients in a fair
Essay On Prigg Vs Pennsylvania
500 Words | 2 PagesThe Prigg vs. Pennsylvania case of 1842 is one of the most important Supreme Court cases over slavery. The case involved a black woman named Margaret Morgan, a former black slave that was freed by her master, John Ashmore, but was never formally emancipated. As Margaret settled down with her husband, a free-born black man named Jerry Morgan in Pennsylvania, John Ashmore's widow, Margaret Ashmore hired Nathan Bemis and Edward Prigg to collect the alleged fugitive (Armenti, para.3). The men followed the 1826 law of which they must apply to a judge to issue a warrant for fugitives. After the granted permission by Thomas Henderson, the group found and captured the entire Morgan family, including Jerry Morgan.
Analysis Of Maryland By James Ryder Randall
512 Words | 3 Pages“Maryland, My Maryland” is a nine- stanza poem written by James Ryder Randall in April 1861. Randall is most remembered for writing this poem, and on account of this he is known as “Poet Laureate of the Lost Cause”. This poem was written in response to the April 19, 1861 shooting of Baltimore civilians who had attacked soldiers from the 6th Massachusetts Infantry as they marched to Washington. At the beginning of the American Civil War specifically, during the secession crisis, President Abraham Lincoln commanded federal troops to be brought to Washington D.C. to protect the capital. (Library of Congress Poetry Resources.
Us Vs Walling Case Study
499 Words | 2 PagesAnd if those considered free of criminal involvement may nevertheless be searched or inspected under civil statutes, it is difficult to understand why the Fourth Amendment would prevent entry onto their property to recover evidence of a crime not committed by them but by others. As we understand the structure and language of the Fourth Amendment and our cases expounding it, valid warrants to search property may be issued when it is satisfactorily demonstrated to the magistrate that fruits, instrumentalities, or evidence of crime is located on the premises. The Fourth Amendment has itself struck the balance between privacy and public need, and there is no occasion or justification for a court to revise the Amendment and strike a new balance by denying the search warrant in the circumstances present here and by insisting that the investigation proceed by subpoena duces tecum, whether on the theory that the latter is a less intrusive alternative or
If Mr. Jones And Cut-Rate Liquor, Was Intoxicated?
1006 Words | 5 PagesAn Opening Your Honor, the opposing counsel, members of the jury, this case is about the unreliability of evidence and an insufficiency to meet the burden of proof that is required to convict Mr. Jones and Cut-Rate Liquor with a violation of Nita Liquor Commission Regulation 3.102. This case is to be decided on four issues: 1) Knowledge. Whether the Defendant, Mr. Jones and Cut-Rate Liquor, knew or ought to have known that the customer, Mr. Watkins, was intoxicated? 2) Sale.
Case Of Fitzgerald V. Lawrence
1157 Words | 5 PagesOn balance, the probative value of evidence of Ms. Fitzgerald’s drug use is extremely high and substantially outweighs any risk of either unfair prejudice or undue delay. IV. MS. FITZGERALD’S PRIOR DURG US IS EXEMPT FROM THE PROHIBITON ON HEARSAY UNDER RULE
Griswold Vs Connecticut Case Study
212 Words | 1 PagesGriswold V. Connecticut 381 U.S. 479 (1965) Facts: The two appellants Griswold and Buxton were both arrested and charged under the Connecticut Comstock Act of 1879. They both violated this act by providing information and medical advice to married persons on means of preventing conception. They were both found guilty of aiding clients and were fined 100 dollars each.
State Vs Deanna Case Study
458 Words | 2 PagesState v. Deanna Conspiracy Oral or implied agreement between two or more to commit an unlawful act Alma found Deanna searching in the managers office. Deanna told Alma that she was looking for keys to the safe because she was looking for papers in the safe. Alma told her she didn’t believe her and that she would keep watch for her. Her actions indicate they are both aware and agree that Deanna is going to commit a crime.
What Was Involved In The Case Of Graham V. Conner
568 Words | 3 PagesThe Supreme Court finally reversed the Fourth Circuit, and took Grahams case to trial. The Supreme Court later remanded Graham’s case back to the lower courts with orders to persecute the officers based on the Fourth Amendment’s “objective reasonableness
Mapp Vs Ohio Case Study
1872 Words | 8 PagesThis ruling is controversial because many say that this will let guilty people go free on police carelessness, while others say that the constitution is not a technicality and allows for the equal prosecution of all
More about Maryland Vs Pringle Case Study
Us Vs Clemons Case Study
514 Words | 3 PagesMaryland Vs Pringle Case Study
217 Words | 1 PagesCase Study: Police Officer Vs. Rodriguez Car
135 Words | 1 PagesRonald Rompilla Vs Jeffrey A Beard Summary
890 Words | 4 PagesTennessee Vs Garner Case Study
260 Words | 2 PagesRV Stinchcombe's Case: Precedent Set For Canada
880 Words | 4 PagesEssay On Prigg Vs Pennsylvania
500 Words | 2 PagesAnalysis Of Maryland By James Ryder Randall
512 Words | 3 PagesUs Vs Walling Case Study
499 Words | 2 PagesIf Mr. Jones And Cut-Rate Liquor, Was Intoxicated?
1006 Words | 5 PagesCase Of Fitzgerald V. Lawrence
1157 Words | 5 PagesGriswold Vs Connecticut Case Study
212 Words | 1 PagesState Vs Deanna Case Study
458 Words | 2 PagesWhat Was Involved In The Case Of Graham V. Conner
568 Words | 3 PagesMapp Vs Ohio Case Study
1872 Words | 8 Pages