Roar of the Crowd On April 27, 2015,There was a protest about the recent death of Freddie Grey who died while in police custody and following other similar incidents all over the country. There was rioting and looting and burning of business buildings in the communities but the police were told to not to use lethal force. However they were outgunned and outnumbered by Baltimore rioters. Only when a curfew was established and National Guard was brought in, was the riot quelled. Potential rioters were told to go home and not come out until 5am. The riots stopped but tension remains. What is in the mind of the rioters? Why did they join in? How can one avoid mob mentality? These are common questions asked about people who participate in rioting. This essay will explore some of the reasons and rationales about mob mentality. …show more content…
Dr. Wendy James explains that contagion theory states that groups have incredible influence over individuals. The result is the when the crowd loses control so does the individual. As soon as the crowd became destructive, unaffiliated individuals from around the city joined in. She describe the convergence theory that like minded people come together such as the cyber media messages to meet a the mall in Baltimore as a starting point. Emergent norm has aspects of both contagion and convergence where people are like minded, have similar emotions and anonymity. There was anger that the law was not effective and they perceived that no justice was served. These theories were evident in Baltimore on the day of the
To have a leader directing the mob reveals that the formation of the riot didn’t happen overnight. The people may have gathered in houses or other places to discuss their current living
Riots happen today for many reasons the reaction has generally been the same as it was in The Lynchings in Duluth, call the National Guard. Police departments have been getting better and better as time goes on, they are more professional, better trained and better equipped yet large scale violence is still too much for them to handle. The difference between now and the 1920s is that if the national guard is called it will likely be known around the world with in minutes if not seconds of the troops deployment, this kind of publicity leads to much more caution being taken when calling the National Guard because if the violence is not bad enough then there may be an outcry and if it happens to late and the rioting gets out of hand than the public will be mad because of the lack of action. In the twenties the government had much more leeway when it came to handling things in somewhat less than ethical ways because news didn’t travel anywhere even remotely close as it does today and elections did not hang on whether or not a riot was handled properly or not as long as everything worked out at the
Angry people were mad at the injustice of letting Powell and the other officers acquitted for an injustice done to Rodney King. People mobilized themselves to create riots for the cause of justice of the inequality. They wanted a change and protection of their rights as a citizen. Many people felt in danger. The verdict was the fuel to people especially minorities to fight for their rights and their safety.
Through a comprehensive understanding of the motivations and underlying factors of the rioters in Baltimore, a deeper interpretation of post-revolutionary nationalism may be revealed. This gained knowledge would help twenty-first century Americans understand current nationalist trends and movements while such movements interact with contemporary political and socioeconomic variables. Therefore, the relatively peaceful demonstrations and assemblies common in the early republic unexpectedly turned violent in Baltimore City during the summer of 1812 because of the Federalist and Democratic-Republican politics and their interactions with the nationalistic, yet diverse, groups of wage laborers in Baltimore
This lead to acts of anger and defiance, People began to start riots on November 24th, 2014 the day that the jury’s decision became public knowledge. Crowds of protesters began to form outside of the police department. Over a dozen buildings were set on fire, there was vandalism, gun fights, and destruction of property. But all to prove a point. The people wanted to say that it was not okay to let one man’s heinous sin go unpunished.
As aforementioned, peer pressure is not always negative, and can often have positive causes and effects, including mental and physical health benefits. The goal of flash mobs is to convey an idea in a brief amount of time through a phenomena known as “buzz”, where people discuss the possibility of participating in an event to such an extent that news of the event’s occurrence is spread to a large population (Wasik). In Bill Wasik’s “My Crowd Experiment: The Mob Project”, ideas surrounding flash mobs, their impact on society, widespread success due to buzz, and mob psychology are explored. He considers mob psychology to be a type of “…herd instinct… about the desire not to be out of the latest fad” (Wasik 480).
As previously noted, Mayor Johnson was present before the mobs on June 22 and July 27-28, pleading with them to disperse. Following the June 22 destruction of Hanson’s office, Mayor Johnson and city magistrates assembled all of the city’s officials and constables for a parade through the streets. Their intent was to show the laborers and other mob participants that the city’s elite was united against further acts of public disorder and destruction. The laborers were unmoved by the elite’s display and continued to voice their displeasure against Federalists supporters who spoke out condemning the June 22 event. At this point, in Baltimore city, the working class denied paternalistic authority and asserted a new, purely democratic order of society where their mob justice would enforce the “laws of nature and reason” not the Baltimore government or
Peaceful protests turned violent because of the pressure from the authority, like the Bloody Sunday protest
In recent years, we have had a series of events that have sparked outrage across our world. This outrage sometimes leads to an issue I have in contemporary culture: mob mentality. “Herd mentality”, or more commonly known as “mob mentality” refers to how people lose their self-awareness and moral code when they are with a group of people. Mob mentality usually drives people to do things they wouldn’t normally do, such as jumping someone, Whether it be a large amount of people online harassing an artist or a movement that has been tainted by the aggressive nature of some, herd/mob mentality has become a more prevalent and pressing issue in the 21st century.
This riot was initiated by the very people our nation was trying to assist which lead to an overwhelming concern. Similar to the situation then, our nation still suffers the same fate and scrutiny today. The presence our government sustains in other nations causes a level of friction (Nacos 32). This friction or disagreements even though they may be insignificant will eventually amount to something that can no longer be tolerated and tarnish the very view the host nation once had. The author is stating that as a nation, our views should not always be their views.
This essay aimed to discuss causes of London riots 2011, as well as the effects and possible solutions. There were varied causes that triggered the London riots. The anger against brutal treatment by the police have centered as the considerable causes of this issue, specifically in black and adolescence destitute neighborhood. The study showed that rioters tend to originate from neighborhoods where ethnic fractionalization was high, and from territories with a less charitable association. Political grievances additionally developed as imperative.
His can-do attitude is shown after the riot when African Americans begin to arm themselves and fight back. The author focuses on these two to prove the point that the African American people, while able to make decisions for themselves, were heavily influenced by the media, fear, and black leaders of their
[“1992 Riot in Los Angeles”] The arrest was only the tip of the iceberg. After the video was released to the press, it triggered the infamous riot of 1992. The riot began in the middle of town a d lasted three days. Throughout these days, the president “ordered military troops and riot trained federal officers” [“1992 Riot in Los Angeles”] to help control the situation.
Rallies may start off peaceful but others who may agree with those protesting don’t always do it peacefully this causes riots and looting, which is the farthest thing from peaceful. There is a fine line from marching down the streets peacefully and making your opinion know like Martin Luther King Jr did in 1965, in Alabama to help fight for the right of African-Americans to vote. Then someone saying it’s okay to loot and destroy cars and stores because they are expressing their opinion.
The chaos in London rose from a morning rally which became a violent battle between the Metropolitan Police Service and protesters, which ended in rampaging and plundering of London until 3 a.m. Sunday, 1 April