Formerly in my thoughts often arise questions about how wikipedia, facebook, twitter, mini opera and others earn income to pay the operational costs of the website. Although everything has been answered, after that curiosity my thinking switch to Mozilla, who questioned how this browser earn revenue ..? According to information obtained from various sources, the browser known as Mozilla Firefox was founded by two companies that are not different, where the two companies are Mozilla Foundation and Mozilla Corporation. Although both are not different but there is no similarity, among of them is how to earn revenue. The Mozilla Foundation focuses on donations (non-profit companies), then Mozilla Corporation, which is a tax-laden commercial enterprise. Although like that but both are connected, where Mozilla Corporation is a subsidy of the Mozilla Foundation. …show more content…
Answered is correct or not my thinking that questioned his income opinion, It turns out the Mozilla browser to earn money as revenue from Google. You must be wondering how Google can pay mozilla, while mozilla also does not provide any content for search results on Google machines. Please note, when surfers use mozilla for searching in cyberspace, in the url address column at the top when we input the keyword instead of the ending ur extention com, net, org and others, then we click enter, then automatically the browser screen Will display search results from google engine. That is, indirectly the browser is being used as if to force us to use google services, specifically as a search engine. Then from there the cooperation of the two big companies. Maybe some visitors there who still do not believe, want to google pay mozilla ..?. To be understood, mozilla is one of the most famous browsers in the world. It can be imagined, according to estimates, how many people use it for browsing and forced to use google search engine service, by Dia
Was Firoozeh experience affected from the attack of Shah's visit to President Carter in 1977? As we know Shah was a very powerful Monarchy leader who was coming to visit the President in 1977. During 1977 there were very few Iranians staying in America. The Iranians who were staying were invited to see Shah and the Iranian government would cover all expenses. Firoozeh, Kazem, and Nazireh head out to Washington and they arrived at their hotel and that's when they started receiving threats on a note saying that Americans were going to kill them.
Browsers allow you to search for and view various kinds of information on the Web, such as web sites, video, audio, etc. These web browsers usually have generic features such: • Navigation buttons • Refresh
In the article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicholas Carr clearly states his thesis and the idea that not only is google changing the way we as humans think, read, and write, but all of technology is affecting us in our everyday lives. The internet sources such as Google are created to find information fast and easy for users. Google does all the searching and hard work of having to read through huge articles. We are humans have it easy now, we no longer have to do all the reading and digging around of endless articles and papers.
The article is not specifically directed at Google but more on the effects of the internet. In my opinion, technology can be distracting, especially the abundance it is in these days and can make it hard for one to concentrate. For example, if a person has a phone, tablet and I-pod it is going
In the article Nicholas Carr published called “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” (Carr, 557) he explains how the Web and technology has impacted us. He also has written several books and articles about technology, business, and culture. (Carr, 556) I believe Nicholas has enough background information to be reliable for what is in his article.
Is it really Googles fault or is America just lazy? In Nicolas Carr's article "Is Google Making Us Stupid?", he argues that people feel like they cannot read longer articles and books because we now have everything at our fingertips on Google. Is it right to assume that it really is Googles fault when there is not much factual evidence to back that up? The argument that Carr presents to us in his article is problematic in that he provides weak evidence and insufficient assumptions but includes many strong viewpoints from other recognized scholars. A piece of evidence Carr provides is that as a part of a five-year research program from the University College London, "scholars examined computer logs documenting the behavior of visitors...
Carr talks about the effects of Google by stating its company mission; “to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful”by becoming the “perfect search engine” and understand exactly what you mean and give you back exactly what you
Google is changing the way we perceive, process and interpret about different things. “I'm not thinking the way I used to think. I can feel it most strongly when I'm reading… Now my concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages. I get fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking for something else to do.(Carr 313)”
A Response To Nicholas Carr: is Google Making Us Stupid? Google a powerhouse in today’s rapidly expanding technological society. My dad uses Google to access information. You use Google to access information.
“Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Argument Analysis In July 2008, Nicholas Carr wrote an article for The Atlantic magazine, titled “Is Google making us stupid?” (Carr, 2008). In this paper, I will analyze the argument he presents.
In my opinion, I think that these companies are changing the world and making it worse. We should be able to have great technology. Follow me as I discuss about the political cartoon of these companies. In Document 1 14-6, the political cartoon shows a Google van that is driving away quickly and knocking four business men out, they happen to be a Taxi driver, Truck driver, bus driver, and a privacy.
Cancer Research operates on a national scale, which means they offer their service to people in the United Kingdom. The owner of the charity Cancer Research won’t want to be making profits, they will be focusing on offering the best service possible to his customers. The money cancer research does receive from donations they will spend on research and treatments for
The article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” is world wide, published article. It was written by “Nicholas Carr”, who has published various books and articles on a wide range of topics; including that of technology, business, and culture (Comley 609). However, with this article, Carr is bringing us to a whole new perspective on how the popular search engine, “Google”, is affecting our learning/intelligence. We, as individuals, are letting “Google” perform our own learning for us, creating a slow downfall in American intelligence. First off, Carr is an extremely credible author in that he is most known for being elected to the Encyclopedia Britannica’s editorial board of advisors in 2008 and was a graduate of Harvard University (Comley 609).
Overall, Nicholas Carr’s article succeeds in persuading his claim that Google makes people stupid in the article. His whole argument about the Internet has changed the audience way of thinking. He uses rhetorical techniques that are aimed at an audience that will believe him, people like millennials or even an older audience that knew what the internet was like before it was so common.
“The Internet is the first thing that humanity has built that humanity doesn't understand, the largest experiment in anarchy that we have ever had” This mystery of the internet will always stay unsolved, but in my opinion, I think that this mystical internet delivers a bad impact on one’s life in many prospects but it benefits us as well. In the essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, Carr tries to explain his point that the internet is playing a very crucial role in one’s life and the virtual life is taking its toll on society compared to the reality. Carr’s theory of google making us stupid is extremely useful because it sheds insight on the consequences which are a result of excessive use of the internet. The internet has directly influenced